Tony Z
763 posts








Everyone needs to truly appreciate the absurdity of this answer from @baroncoleman - the criminal defense attorney who has now apparently pocketed nearly $500,000 in superchats for his Tyler Robinson / Charlie Kirk assassination “analysis”. I asked why the defense would not have called the parents as witnesses at the preliminary hearing if the parents in fact would have testified that they in fact did not identify Tyler in the surveillance video and they in fact did not turn him in. His answer: Because the parents would have been asked if Tyler confessed to other crimes “other than murdering Charlie Kirk”, the answer to which Coleman “assumes” would be that “he did”. That was his actual answer. This is not legal analysis. It is Babylon Bee-level satire.




Is Candace Owens on trial? I must have completely missed that…. But the way these people are talking about her 24/7 like it’s their job is what makes me wonder WHO is actually on trial here? Candace or Tyler?


This is how she responds to legitimate criticism Candace is a snake










I don’t know what late stage delusion TPUSA is experiencing when Andrew Kolvet, who has personally tanked the Charlie Kirk show, is claiming that my engagement has fallen off a cliff. Where, Andrew? There are entire accounts dedicated to discussing me full-time. And oh, the irony! Andrew Kolvet who recently promoted a report referring to me as a “digital assassin”, plus routinely blames the world for not keeping Erika safe when she flat out abandoned her speaking engagement due to low ticket sales—is now claiming I’m a “Karen” for asking if it works both ways. Do words only amount to violence when it comes to Erika, @AndrewKolvet? Is the report you shared accurate? Are you putting my life at risk by tweeting words I don’t like?



















