Torryder
31.4K posts



@Frances_Coppola I can't say how many times (thanks to your investigations and interpretations) I argued this point with other people over the past few years. Thank you.
English

Farage's lie is still being spread.
Coutts closed Farage's accounts because he didn't meet their published financial criteria. Yes, his political views were a factor. They were the reason Coutts chose not to offer him another loan after he paid off his mortgage. No bank is obliged to lend.
But Coutts did not prevent him from putting enough money into his deposit accounts to meet the criteria. He chose not to do so. That's on him, and that's why they closed his accounts.
Coutt's analysis of the reputational risk he posed to them was spot on. They also accurately forecast that he would return to front-line politics. And although they did not find evidence of shady financial activity, they thought it was a risk. We now know they were right.
MIke@MrMikeCS
@Frances_Coppola @donmcgowan But the Coutts analysis was wrong. They debanked him for perceived political views. Try imagining yourself in that position.
English

@SkyNews @TrevorPTweets Is it a coincidence that at a time when Farage is at his lowest and at risk of leaving politics, that this bloviator suddenly appears in the press and on TV?
English

🗣️'Ukraine should join NATO.'
Boris Johnson tells Sky's @TrevorPTweets that 'we have made a mistake about not being clear about the final status of Ukraine. I don't think Putin will desist until he thinks it is game over'
trib.al/VRvt3F3
English

@of_elwher @lana_burner @SangitaMyska @mikegalsworthy I'm not even saying he mis spoke. He said "Israel has the right to defend herself...It has THAT right (to defend herself) provided it falls within International Law." It was the interjection by Ferrari part way through this reply to the previous question that caused the confusion
English

@Torryder @lana_burner @SangitaMyska @mikegalsworthy You are rewriting history by pretending Starmer merely misspoke and didn’t do enough to condemn Israel.
He’s spent 2 1/2 years excusing Israeli war crimes, not to mention providing intelligence, training and materiel to the IDF and smearing and criminalising pro-Palestinians.
English

Labour’s rewriting of history is quite something.
The main problem was NOT that Labour was “too slow to call for a ceasefire” as Andy Burnham & Yvette Cooper now say it is.
The problem was Starmer, a human rights lawyer, saying Israel cutting off water and electricity was acceptable - and taking 9 days to correct the record.
Ongoing UK intelligence, military & trade co-operation during a genocide
Ministers refusing to listen to surgeons trying to advocate for killed/maimed children
Backing Trump & Netanyahu without question for almost two years.
The list goes on and on and on….
English

@of_elwher @lana_burner @SangitaMyska @mikegalsworthy He didn't. But I can see we are getting no where with this disagreement.
English

@Torryder @lana_burner @SangitaMyska @mikegalsworthy On LBC, Starmer supported Israel starving Palestinians.
9 days later, he claims he misspoke and was answering a previous question.
Other interviews at that time provide wider context as to whether his explanation is credible.
English

@of_elwher @lana_burner @SangitaMyska @mikegalsworthy Because the original accusation was that he stated he supported the withholding of water and food. It's not rewriting history to say "he didn't". Few would argue with you to say he wasn't vocal enough against Israels actions, without accusing him of saying something he didn't.
English

@lana_burner @Torryder @SangitaMyska @mikegalsworthy We can all see that Starmer deliberately refused to condemn war crimes. He did so intentionally. Repeatedly.
Even hawkish Labour MPs now admit Starmer's unconditional support for Israel was wrong, so I don't know why you're so desperate to rewrite history.
English

@JohnHyde1982 It's the right place for that feeling on here!! 😂 You are better off elsewhere, though. (Once you've calmed down!)
English

@of_elwher @SangitaMyska @mikegalsworthy Sorry, have to agree to disagree there. I agree he could (should) have been more forthright in saying it did NOT include the right to deny food/water. But he never said it DID. I accept others have a different interpretation, but I don't agree with them.
English

@Torryder @SangitaMyska @mikegalsworthy It wasn’t just the LBC interview. That was the one that caught everyone’s attention, but Starmer’s excuse that he was answering a previous question doesn’t explain all the other interviews where he expressed similar opinions.
Chłoddy@OfSymbols
He actually said it on 3 separate occasions, on one he was asked to clarify it and repeated himself. Two shadow ministers also repeated the same line. Nothing to do with Ferrari really. A month later he explained the LBC clip, but not the others.
English

@SangitaMyska @mikegalsworthy I presume this is the LBC interview with Ferrari. If so, I listened to it a couple of times to be sure. Respectfully, I disagree with your (and many others) interpretation of what he said. However, I appreciate I won't change anyone's mind, especially not on this forum.
English

@Torryder @mikegalsworthy You can google it. It took him 9 days and huge public outrage to say he didn’t quite mean what he said (sort of)
English
Torryder retweetledi

@Frances_Coppola I remember reading it as a child. It certainly was an easier read than The Lord of the Rings trilogy.
English

I read The Hobbit when I was six.
pete@pete_churchill
@bazashc Have you ever read it??? It’s 100% not a children’s book and whoever says that is lying to you. Not only is the vernacular dated and elaborate but the sentence structure and lengthy writing is often hard to get your head around as an adult. Love that book! but it’s not for kids
English

@Frances_Coppola Some people mentioned to me that the subject of the press article post dated the Coutts debacle. I had said that it is entirely possible thar this wasn't Farage's first foray into questionable money transactions.
English


@liangreen123 @PippaCrerar @mikegalsworthy @Annaisaac I'm saying they need to review how deeply they investigated the source of wealth.
English

@Torryder @PippaCrerar @mikegalsworthy @Annaisaac So you sre suggesting the solicitors concerned may be either incompetant or corrupt?
English

EXCL: The £5m gift to Nigel Farage by a cryptocurrency billionaire was reported to the National Crime Agency by bankers who were concerned it may have been laundered money - another big scoop by our @Annaisaac
theguardian.com/politics/2026/…
English

@liangreen123 @PippaCrerar @mikegalsworthy @Annaisaac I am fully aware of that, which is why I asked the question in the first place. I'm a property lawyer.
English

@Torryder @PippaCrerar @mikegalsworthy @Annaisaac You would know that you have to reveal how and where your money comes from to buy said property
English

@Nigel_Farage Who is the registered proprietor of the property, Nigel? Who "actually" paid for it? Where did the money really come from?
English




