Torsti Nisula

@ShitpostRock2 Good glasses, bifocals, in the glasses shop in Finland, are 900 euro without the gold. Just the lenses with all the durability treatments and 200 euro frames are on the lower end.

Question to people who wear glasses, do you really need to spend 1k on good glasses or is this literally just to flex?

@Saved5872 @DesireeAmerica4 Fuckhead police shoots your dog for barking while walking by your house. Question is should they? Was the samaritan over the line?

@DesireeAmerica4 The guy that pulled the other guy off the top of the car could be charged with assault.

One of those “this can’t be real” moments. Some guy perched himself smack on the hood of a car, refusing to budge, trapping the poor driver at an intersection. Before anyone even had time to dial the police, some random SUV driver had *had enough.* This guy storms out, grabs the hood-sitter, and hurls him onto the pavement like a wrestler clearing the ring. So, here’s the question: if someone’s acting like a traffic troll, do bystanders get a pass for going full vigilante to solve the problem, or did that guy just leap wayyyy over the line?

@taija_myyra @somemuija Urheilusta tulee nopeaa palkitsemisrumba herkkupaloille.

@somemuija Epäilen, että lenkkeily ja sali haittaavat vaan laihdutusta. Naapurin emännät ovat ainakin kymmenen vuotta lenkkeilleet ja tulos ei kyllä näy.

Miehet on just niinkuin että ”vaihdoin kahvikerman ykkösmaitoon ja laihduin 50kg” Meanwhile naiset: ”olen syönyt pelkkää salaattia 6 kk ja käynyt salilla 4 kertaa viikossa ja lenkillä joka päivä, vaaka näyttää 700g vähemmän kuin syksyllä”

@JohanPaasikivi @AlankoTuulia Nyt kun tiedät, mihin arvelit keskustelua viedä? Kieltää saadun tiedon oikeellisuuden? Sinulla sittenkin on parempaa tietoa? Itsehän olet profiili ilmoituksen mukaan sen propaganda paskan suomalaisilla alkulähteillä. Vai jatkatko tietämättömyyden teeskentelyä?

@TorstiNisula @AlankoTuulia Kysyin ihan asiallisesti. Sinussako on kaikki viisaus. Saatana.

Samat ihmiset, jotka ovat pelotelleet meidän nuorison sillä, että lasten saaminen on maailman suurin loukkaus ilmastoa kohtaan, haluavat tilalle 44 000 maahanmuuttajaa vuodessa. Meillä on kenties ennätysmäärä ulkomaalaista työvoimaa täällä työttömänä. Silti 44 000 uutta tarvitaan. Kenelle vielä menee läpi se, ettei tietyt intressitahot haluaisi täyttää meidän maatamme työikäisillä ulkomaalaisilla puhtaasti siksi, jotta voidaan polkea palkkoja? Työperäisen maahanmuuton alkuperäinen idea oli kai täydentää suomalaisia työmarkkinoita tilanteessa, kun paikkaan ei kotimaasta löydy tekijää. Nyt agenda on muuttunut avoimesti täysin toiseksi.

@nokimies88 @TalousKuria Eurooppalaisia valtion velkoja ei osta kukaan täyspäinen omalla rahalla vapaaehtoisesti. Korkotulot ei mahda ihan inflaatiota ylittää 10v aikana. Pankkien ja vakuutusyhtiöiden lailliset velvollisuudet ja niiden suuruudet ei ole ihan läpinäkyviä, mutta suuri osa menee aina EKPhen.

@TalousKuria EIkö keskuspankki joo alkannut ostaa italian lappua tuossa 22? Miehen muisti lyhyt.

Italian velkapapereiden riskipreemiot Saksaan nähden +100% muutamassa viikossa. Kohta alkaa "elvyttäminen" EU tulee lätkäisemään sellaisen yhteisvelan maksettavaksi että varmasti tuntuu ihan jokaisen lompakossa. Ei jää epäselväksi kuka rahat vie ja miksi. Kiitos että jatkat ottamista @kokoomus Kiva huomata silleen selkeästi ettei tässä maassa ole muita kuin sosialisteja eduskunnassa.

@mkma918 @RockChartrand You're slandering real slavery. You're not entitled a job. You're free to make your own arrangements.

@RockChartrand Accepted wages? Or wages with no choice but to accept?

The difference is simple. The government takes from what you’ve actually earned. Your employer doesn’t take your pay. They pay you what you agreed to. The “500% they stole from you” only exists in a theory no one consented to. The wage you accepted is the reality. One is an actual transfer from your income. The other is a claim on income that was never yours to begin with.

@jonburkeUK Because we can't afford batteries that keep us warm, when there's more than 1 day of clouds. Even 1 day of batteries is out of reach for most people.

You can’t afford a coal mine. You can’t afford a gas turbine. You can’t afford an oil rig. Only fossil fuel states and billionaires can. But you can afford a solar power station on your roof. Now, ask yourself why you encounter so much anti-renewable energy propaganda.

@SalomaaTeemu Ei liitolla ole valtaa tehdä asialle mitään.

EK eli Elinkeinoelämän Keskusliitto pitää lopettaa haitallisena organisaationa. Täysin aivokuollutta porukkaa. Suomessa on työnantajapula ja tänne halutaan raahata 50 000 ulkomaalaista työntekijää vuosi tasolla? Morjes mitä low iQ ihmisiä.

@JohanPaasikivi @AlankoTuulia Ylipopulaatiosta ja resurssien riittämättömyydesta on peloteltu peruskoulussa ja virallisessa mediassa 50 vuotta. Etkö saatana mitään tiedä tai näe?

@AlankoTuulia ”Samat ihmiset, jotka ovat pelotelleet meidän nuorison sillä, että lasten saaminen on maailman suurin loukkaus ilmastoa kohtaan, haluavat tilalle 44 000 maahanmuuttajaa vuodessa.” Ketkä ovat pelotelleet?

@ttmygh @ARottenOldOne @EpsilonTheory Sarcasm doesn't work with strangers on written speech, on short comments.

@ARottenOldOne @EpsilonTheory The art of sarcasm is officially dead

Masterful performance

@Togera_Jake @lporiginalg Yeah like "who would think that men of wealth and power would conspire"? Most everyone. Obviously. Literal retards would think that.

@lporiginalg people would call you a conspiracy theorist. but they dont realize how much Big Seed is worth

@vanhamiesseko @EeroAhtola Kyllä se on erityisesti vasemmisto, joka huoraa ja kadehtii muiden rahojen perään, haluten takavarikoida niitä itselleen ja kavereilleen. Liikemies nojaa vapaaehtoiseen kauppaan. Poliittinen oikeisto on siitä paska, että haluaa maksaa jo sovitut kuluerät veroilla.

@EeroAhtola No mistä niinku luulet että ihmisten arvostus johtuu? Siellä oikeistosiivessä kun kaikki ajatellaan € kautta, ei siellä ole kykyä nähdä tai visioida tai kykyä ajatella mistä hyvä elämä koostuu. Palvelut pitää rahoittaa tietysti ja rahoituksen prioriteetti pitää olla korkealla

Maailman suurinta julkista sektoria pidetään täällä hämmästyttävän korkeassa arvossa edelleen. Hyvin näyttää toimittajien vallankumous onnistuneen Ainoa ongelma on vaan, että numerot ovat täysin tätä äärimmäisen keskusvetoista mallia vastaan. Tulokset ovat surkeaa luettavaa. 👇

@IkeubaE @TheBTCTherapist @SRollexx They just pushed usa out of the strait, and usa can do nothing about it. International law is a figment of imagination, that was destroyed by usa led colition.

@TheBTCTherapist @SRollexx $2M per vessel isn’t a confirmed or standardized fee. The Strait of Hormuz is governed by international law. Charging arbitrary tolls could trigger global backlash. Major naval powers patrol the area consistently. So it’s not as simple as “charge and collect.

Iran after they realize about 140 vessels a day pass through the Strait of Hormuz $2 million per vessel = $280 million a day $2 billion a week $100 billion a year

@joni_askola Boasting supporting immigrant low wage labor, is not the racisim win you think it is.

That study is just static math by a Finnish far-right think tank. It tallies raw costs but ignores the opportunity cost of demographic collapse and dismisses the third generation before they can even work, since Somali and Iraqi migration in Finland only began in the 1990s

@Drystonesonnet @RadioGenoa Yes? And they do more of it today.

@RadioGenoa This is old news from at least a year ago.

More than ten British police officers have arrested an elderly man for using what they said was offensive language on social media. UK is worse than North Korea.

@60Minutes Learned what inflation is yet? You are going to.

Shipyards desperately need welders, pipefitters, and other skilled workers. But this work is grueling and dangerous. cbsn.ws/4bIyP6O

@napoleon_tez @benwehrman @Selkis_2028 They kept is civilized. Pride is a sin.

@benwehrman @Selkis_2028 You know the culture that gave us Aristotle was full of man on man love, right? Ever heard of Achilles?

@Colson_Potter @Handre That is anarchism, no rulers. Permanently violent mob justice beign anarchism is a government zealot fantaay, that never manifests, without government abuse.

@Handre We should note that this doesn't represent anarchism; it represents nascent local self-governance, of the type hinted at in the role of elders in the Old Testament (the Bible).

When gold miners flooded into Deadwood in 1876, the federal government had zero presence and local law enforcement didn't exist—yet somehow civilization flourished without collapsing into Mad Max chaos. You had thousands of men carrying guns, handling massive amounts of gold dust, drinking heavily, and gambling constantly. The statists would predict immediate societal breakdown. Instead, private businesses emerged to provide every service government claims monopoly over. Saloon owners hired their own security. Mining claim disputes got resolved through private arbitration. Transportation companies protected their own shipments. Even justice operated through private courts and community enforcement. Wild Bill Hickok's death actually illustrates the system working. Jack McCall shot him in the back on August 2, 1876. The community immediately organized a people's court, tried McCall, and initially acquitted him (they botched it—thought they lacked jurisdiction). But when McCall bragged about the killing in another town, they re-arrested him and he faced proper justice. No federal marshals needed. The violence you read about in Hollywood versions? Greatly exaggerated. Deadwood's murder rate stayed remarkably low for a frontier boom town of 5,000+ people. Private property rights got respected. Contracts got honored. Hell, they even built infrastructure—roads, bridges, water systems—all through voluntary cooperation and private funding. And this wasn't some primitive barter economy (though they did use gold directly, proving Menger's regression theorem beautifully). These entrepreneurs created sophisticated financial networks, insurance systems, and trade relationships spanning continents. Government finally showed up in 1877 and immediately began taxing, regulating, and "organizing" what private enterprise had already built efficiently. Just like they always do—arrive late, take credit, then claim you couldn't have survived without them.

@AkrudeWisdom @Handre By that day standards? Flourish, absolutely. Food creation was all manual. It was hard fing work. What did the cityfolk provide to their food farmers?

@Handre We might need to examine our definition of flourish here. But I get your point.

@sean_larabee @FountainheadFm @Handre Why would you try to defend these goofy fucks? Are you demented?

It is not quite that bad. It is some state bureaucrats that make the decision to issue the certificate or not, not In-and-Out. Course In-and-Out knows who these bureaucrats are. Have been paying for them to go to 'seminars' that just happen be in desireable vacation areas. Switched their napkin supplier to a bureaucrat's brother in law's business. Sponsored a free burger day at their kids' schools. Hosted a one day lunch and learn that happened to have an after event dinner at the best steak house in town and picked up the tab.

So you know how hospitals cost a fucking fortune, right? Well, back in 1964, New York basically invented this brilliant idea called "certificate of need" laws. The state said hospitals couldn't expand or build new facilities without government permission - you know, to control costs and prevent "wasteful duplication." (Because nothing says efficiency like bureaucrats deciding where sick people can get treatment.) The feds loved this shit so much that by 1974, they were bribing states with Medicare dollars to adopt these laws nationwide. By 1982, almost every state had jumped on board. Then something hilarious happened - the federal government looked around in the '80s, realized these laws were actually making healthcare MORE expensive (shocking!), and repealed the federal requirements in 1987. But here's where it gets really good. Thirty-five states just kept their certificate of need laws anyway, because why give up power once you've got it? Today, if you want to open a hospital in North Carolina or build an MRI center in Virginia, you've got to prove to some panel of bureaucrats that your community "needs" it. Meanwhile, the 15 states that ditched these laws? They've got more hospitals, lower prices, and better access to care. You're literally sitting in a state where the government decides whether you deserve a nearby hospital based on their fucking spreadsheets. And we wonder why an ambulance ride costs more than a used car.