
Jielhar
2.3K posts

Sabitlenmiş Tweet


@RepThomasMassie It wasn't all for Israel. It was also to draw attention away from the Epstein Files.
English

@simpatico771 Oof, the description you make of the latest round of blows that the US and Iran exchanged is brutal.
It lends credence to the hypothesis that the White House is dangerously misinformed, because why else would they willingly restart the conflict without a real plan?
English

@LostMyHats It's flat-out wrong to accuse Ben Shapiro of having a dual loyalty.
Dual loyalty implies he has any loyalty at all towards the United States.
English

Shapiro walked into the Daily Wire studio a few days ago, sat down, looked into the camera, and sent a message to President Trump:
"Nobody wants Americans to die," Shapiro said. "We are willing to undergo those casualties."
That's very sacrificial of him. Heroic, even. He's weighed the options, prayed to YWHW about this, and walked away with a steely resolve that more dead soldiers is worth what he's asking for: Total War. You know "Total War," right? It's the kind that Israel wages, the *only* kind it wages. It's the type of war in which you don't discern the difference between kids and combatants, and you end up with a 90% civilian body count, like in Gaza. That's what Ben Shapiro wants for a nation of 90 million people.
And you get Total War on the ground, with boots going door to door. No worries. Ben Shapiro has weighed the costs, and he's willing to make that sacrifice. He's a war-gobblin, a grotesque, murderous little gargoyle whose eyebrows keep growing with the calcified plaque in the void where most people have a conscience. Every day, Shapiro says something increasingly more sociopathically inhumane than the day before, and it couldn't be more obvious that at the end of his priority list is what's good for the United States. And there are consequences of that.
Shapiro's flagship show, which once pulled several million views an episode, now averages around half a million, the worst collapse and steepest decline of anything in the ecosystem of news. The company watched its YouTube views fall 34 percent year over year, and saw website traffic cut roughly in half. Shapiro admits revenue is down. The company has now run two rounds of layoffs in just over a year and has just installed a new CEO to try to stop the bleeding. His audience is walking out on him in real time. Why? The public has figured out he doesn’t care for America or Americans. He’s in it for Israel, and Americans have had enough.
In 2019, Shapiro said that if anyone alleges that Jews have dual loyalty, it's "antisemitic." But Jonathan Pollard, a convicted Israeli spy who stole our nuclear secrets that Israel gave to Russia, said back in 2021, "We're Jews, and if we're Jews, we will always have dual loyalty." They can't both be right.
For centuries, the global Jewish community has been fighting off the caricatures painted for them by Henry Ford's "The International Jew." Printed from 1920-1923, they it claimed that Jews in various nations around the world used their Citizenship and/or residence in other nations for their own benefit, manipulating governments to do what was in Jewish interest instead of their own. According to Ford, they maintained influence in media, news, and entertainment that undermined American culture, and engaged in finance and lending in ways that undermined and enslaved the local peoples. He claimed they started wars and then kept wars going as long as possible for their own interests and personal enrichment. It sounded an awfully lot like Ben Shapiro.
Winston Churchill once explained his motivation for supporting Zionism. He described Jewish influence in Europe, “This world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality.” He traced this conspiracy through Jewish figures from Karl Marx to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), and then said it “has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century.”
So why support Zionism? Churchill argued that a Jewish state would keep them from causing problems inside other nations, saying, "It becomes, therefore, specially important to foster and develop any strongly-marked Jewish movement which leads directly away from these fatal associations (with radical movements). And it is here that Zionism has such a deep significance for the whole world at the present time.”
This is what Jewish Americans are up against - centuries of skepticism, whether earned or not, that they don't really care about our national interests, but their own. Well, that's exactly what Americans today think about the Israel Lobby. You'd think that Shapiro, Levin, Loomer and others would be more serious about appearing loyal to America and not Israel. But that isn't the vibe they're giving off.
At Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest in December 2025, Steve Bannon took the stage after Shapiro just left it, and accused him of putting Israel’s interests ahead of the United States, framing the entire fight as a referendum on what Bannon called “this concept of greater Israel and Israel first.” Megyn Kelly told Vanity Fair afterward that she thinks the Israel First label has been “proven correct” by Shapiro’s conduct, and she asked pointedly why Shapiro would rather divide the conservative movement over Israel than let it stay unified after Charlie Kirk’s death. That’s the irony - it’s not Candace Owens splitting the conservative movement. It’s Ben Shapiro doing it.
The Israel Lobby Republicans aren’t even bashful about this threat. We will either give them what they demand - which happens to be every single thing they want on behalf of Israel, including our sons in uniform - or they will tear apart the Republican coalition, limb from limb. They will seek out and destroy Republican influencers like Tucker and Megyn Kelly (far and away the most popular conservatives on the airwaves), they will primary stalwart Republican leaders, like Thomas Massie (who was, far and away, the most popular conservative in the House), and also go after their sizeable fanbases - the Republican voters who support them - if they do not get their way. They will castigate half the Republican voters as antisemitic bigots, and help Democrats to get elected, if they are unable to leverage their political power in America on behalf of Israel.
At this point, practically everyone comprehends that Ben Shapiro’s first, if not only, priority is the State of Israel. Even Piers Morgan publicly urged Trump to ignore what he called “the lunatic warmongers pushing for total war,” speaking of Shapiro. We have gone from lying about the Iran War as a means to “help” Iranians under the regime, to arguing to Trump that it’s time to start killing them. There is no pretense any longer about what Shapiro’s goal is, and what it’s always been. Religious sacrifice.
Well, guess what. The Daily Wire viewers aren't having it. It's bottomed out. The company is quickly becoming worthless, which makes it all the more typical that their upcoming IPO will make Shapiro and other investors more than a billion dollars when it goes public - just in time for them to slide out of a worthless company with a golden parachute and screw the poor saps buying into a company that's about as popular as a migraine. It will be the most stereotypically Jewish business arrangement possible, the stock version of coin-shaving. It will be a worse buy than Blockbuster in 2012.
In the end, Americans want to listen to pundits who support America first. And anyone listening to Ben Shapiro at the moment knows that's not what he's selling."
Read more at Insight to Incite. Link in bio. Audio available.

English

@simpatico771 On first reading, "scatological final struggle" was bizarre. I had to look up the meaning of eschatological, which made a lot more sense
English

Iran is a civilizational force fully actualized into eschatological final struggle.
US is a burger-fed McMansion army staffed with unmotivated Latino poors who can't find Iran on the map and just want their special Army discount on the predatory Dodge Hellcat loan back home.
𝐸𝐵@___eb__
Quick reminder:
English

@kurtaltay007 @cirnosad There's some speculation and it makes for a good story, but no, there's zero evidence so far pointing towards Russian sabotage.
English

NATO thought its a good idea to play the arson game in Russia.

Mambo Italiano@mamboitaliano__
🚨 Devastating wildfire rages in Biscarrosse, France 🇫🇷 Apocalyptic scenes as horses flee the violent advancing flames
English

@MarioNawfal "Oh ho ho, look at this delightful latest war crime"
I'm done with this crap, blocking you over this
English

🇺🇦🇷🇺 We're sorry, your parcel has been delayed
That's the message thousands of Russians will be waking up to this morning after Ukraine torched not one, but two distribution centers near Saint Petersburg
If you're a Wildberries and Ozon e-commerce customer, welcome to the frontlines
Writer: Ian
English


@SandyofCthulhu My favorite is MARIO MCRLWAIN.
How the hell do you even pronounce that?
English

@STANISKRAPIVNIK I disagree on one point: You say this wasn't meant to be a substantive meeting because it was only 35m long, I believe it was 35m long because the meeting was going nowhere.
Rubio clearly wanted Russia to stop providing targeting assistance to Iran, and Lavrov shut him down.
English

Meeting between Sergey Lavrov and Marco Rubio: What's the bottom line?
This is the fifth in-person meeting between the two ministers since January 2025, and the first face-to-face meeting since September 2025. According to Maria Zakharova, the initiative for the meeting came from the American side.
Describing it as either a "breakthrough" or a "failure" is equally superficial. Thirty minutes on the sidelines of a multilateral summit, in the presence of delegations, is a format for checking the time, not for substantive negotiations. And this "check" showed that the gap between Moscow and Washington on the Ukrainian issue remains at the same level.
What the sides stated. According to the Russian Foreign Ministry, Lavrov informed Rubio about the current situation on the front line, called on the United States to refrain from further supplies of weapons to Kyiv, and reaffirmed Russia's readiness for a political and diplomatic settlement – "in development of the agreements reached in Anchorage," to which, according to the Kremlin, Putin had previously agreed. They also discussed the Persian Gulf, the normalization of the work of diplomatic missions, the resumption of contacts between NASA and Roscosmos, and inter-parliamentary and cultural exchanges.
The American side's statement is noticeably more concise. The State Department limited itself to the following: "They discussed US-Russian relations and the need to end the war between Russia and Ukraine." There was no mention of "Anchorage," and no details – a fundamental difference from the Russian interpretation.
Rubio stated on June 25 that "there was no agreement in Alaska – there was a proposal," and he has not backed away from that formula in Manila.
The point of divergence. Moscow refers to the "spirit of Anchorage" as a framework that Washington has not formally rejected. Washington views the meeting between the leaders in August 2025 as a set of proposals without any obligations. This is not a technical difference, but two incompatible platforms for further discussion.
The outcome. The meeting in Manila confirmed that the channel between the Foreign Ministry and the State Department is still active, and that both capitals value the very fact of contact between nuclear powers. However, it also revealed that there is currently no substantive agenda for a deal on Ukraine – the sides did not even agree on what they had previously agreed upon. There are currently no grounds to expect a significant shift after the next meeting.
@sashakots

English

Baldur's Gate 3 wasn't amazing because it was Baldur's Gate. It was amazing because Larian made it.
Larian has made it painfully clear they want absolutely nothing to do with Wizards of the Coast or another BG3. They're off making their own games.
Hasbro looked at that success and went, "How do we recreate this without the people who actually made it?"
Good fucking luck with that.
Pirat_Nation 🔴@Pirat_Nation
Hasbro took a $56 million hit after canceling several video games planned for 2028 and later. The company is shifting focus to games based on its biggest franchises. Even after the cancellations, Hasbro says Baldur’s Gate 3 remains a huge part of its future. The company believes the game’s success proved players want high-quality games based on brands like Dungeons & Dragons.
English

@Megatron_ron Dangerous men live by the aphorism: "Speak softly and carry a big stick"
By contrast, Trump is following the Chihuahua strategy.
English

@NikkiHaley Mm-hm, and who's giving Ukraine the satellite connectivity and targeting data they use to commit war crimes against civilian targets in Russia? Starobelsk remembers.
English

@PaulWolfCO @Megatron_ron When it comes to drones, it's possible Russia is helping Iran with the precision of attacks. Russia is developing its Rassvet satellite system to rival Starlink, and the satellite connectivity allows for manual operation and greater precision of strikes
English

@Megatron_ron I don't think they really mean precision. They mean intel, where the most valuable equipment and people are located.
English

@STANISKRAPIVNIK The so-called Oligarch class. Russia is not an Oligarchy anymore, so it cannot have Oligarchs; it has wealthy business owners.
English


@MHTruthUltra Yes. A series of crises are coming, and the US political class is deeply incompetent and corrupt, so they keep making poor decisions. Profound decline is coming.
English

@TraderStrider No, not the entire country. Only the entire federal government.
English


















