TradingPal

@ZahraaAitech Thank you! A strong differentiator

@TradingPalHQ Congrats on launching backtested numbers on every setup is huge!

Just launched on Product Hunt 🚀 TradingPal finds wedges, trendlines, and consolidation breakouts across stocks, crypto, and ETFs—the same kinds of tight setups successful momentum swing traders have built strategies around. Every setup is drawn on the chart and comes with real backtested numbers: • Win rate • Expected R • Profit factor • Drawdown Stop guessing which setups actually work. producthunt.com/products/tradi… Would appreciate any support 🙏

@AliceInfoAi Appreciate you

@TradingPalHQ Congrats upvoted

@ademolaoluwa12 Appreciate you!

@TradingPalHQ This really impression bro

Target met on $QQQ. The one on $SPY hasn't. Check out both yourself. tradingpal.io/SPY/D?p=hGI tradingpal.io/QQQ/D?p=nPo

@aaliya_va Appreciate you!

@TradingPalHQ awesome u got my upvote

Did I crack the code? Hope I kept someone from pain. Give a follow, I will let you know when we are near a bottom on $SPY. #TA #TradingTips

@ThierryBorgeat Agreed

6 of 7. The 1998 rhyme 1998: mid-term year, secular bull, real tech revolution. S&P –22% July to October. Everyone who sold the panic sold the bottom — right before the most explosive final act in market history. The Nasdaq analog projects an H2 2026 low. Then the run into 2028. The semis parabola says: steep, not yet terminal.

If you’re interested in $SPCX for the long term, start accumulating below $90, which btw is still very expensive because it’s 30x 2026 projected revenue but atleast it’s starting to be within the realms of reason. At $70, it’s 20x, which is very expensive but maybe not for Elon. >$90 is just unreasonable given space compute is probably many years away.

@averycode What’s your best marketing campaign

40 days of marketing my app Hit a tiny milestone 🎉

@kieran__duff What slippage assumption do you typically use? 25 bps?

I stay deliberately loose on entries and strict on exits. A strategy that needs a perfect entry price to work has no margin for the slippage you'll actually get in live conditions.

@GAndersonTrades Definitely choppy. Stay strong! x.com/tradingpalhq/s…

This price action is genuinely offensive. I absolutely fucking hate this market

@michaelsisakov This is tested with in and out sample trades?

Ran a sweep to optimize parameters on the bot: 88.2% Win Rate 5.46 Sharpe Ratio (10 years) 67.93% Average Yearly ROI Happy with the settings that yielded these results. Can safely move to building the auto-trader now. Load it up with $10k and see how the results fare. Then scale once confirmed.

So many traders are getting chopped alive. I told you not to buy unless $SPY closes a week above $761. This kind of post comes from a place of pain because I've been there and learned the hard way numerous times before. Give a follow, I'll show you a new way. I'm still early but eventually ppl will recognize the work here. #SPY

@kieran__duff Doesn’t deflated sharp ratio capture this or is that not enough

Your backtest says 1,000 trades. How many are actually independent? If a feature uses a 200-bar lookback and the strategy trades every bar, consecutive trades share 199 bars of the same data. The returns are autocorrelated, so your effective sample is a fraction of the count, and every significance test on the raw number overstates your confidence. Measure the autocorrelation and discount the count, or space the entries out.

@OddStats Sounds like a pattern for when whales distribute at the top

Ok, I'm not gonna lie. Hide your wife and kids. Look at these 20 day forward max draw downs. Do you even care what this table is about? I didn't think so, but I'll explain it in the next tweet down anyway because, while it looks nuts, if you think about it, it's not. [1/3]

@mayank_408 This. Unless you introduce a bug in the strategy mid-way.

why is it easier to hold a 0.6 sharpe index with 40% DD but not your trading strategy with 2 sharpe and 12% DD

@michaelsisakov Congrats though. Solid work. What's the expected R? And are you using deflated sharp ratio or just naive?

Trading Bot Update - almost ready for the real world. Modified some factors for less overall risk.

@0xbobaaa Kelly will blow your account up if you don’t backtest it. Most don’t use a full Kelly. Maybe a fraction of it. Be careful!

this formula decides who survives in trading everyone argues about what to buy. almost nobody argues about how much f* = (bp - q) / b p and q are your win rate and your loss rate. if the edge isn't positive, f* comes out zero. bet nothing. most traders don't have a zero setting b is the payoff. edge divided by odds. strong conviction on a bad payout still gets you a small position f* is a fraction of the account, never a dollar amount. wins scale the next bet up, losses scale it down. you can shrink forever and never actually hit zero now the part that kills people a real, provable, positive edge will still bankrupt you if you size it wrong. the chart below is the same 400 trades run twice. same win rate. same edge. 10% sizing compounds to 110k. 30% sizing ends at 52 dollars it doesn't blow up because it was wrong. it blows up because it was right too big being right is the cheap part

@Cryptoviirally @michaelsisakov That would be great! We're new to X and about to alpha launch the product. Will dm

@michaelsisakov @TradingPalHQ 🚀 Great project! Wishing you massive success. If you ever need more visibility or community growth on X, feel free to DM me. 🤝

$QQQ Update If we don't get an oil limit up Sunday, the secondary path comes into play. Either way, we're approaching the beginning of the end.