2ndrew

6.9K posts

2ndrew banner
2ndrew

2ndrew

@TrampAbroad1

Katılım Eylül 2012
782 Takip Edilen118 Takipçiler
2ndrew
2ndrew@TrampAbroad1·
@TheDesertLynx How are they not newbie friendly? They’re way easier than those mouse jiggling tools when I got started
English
1
0
0
12
Joel Valenzuela
Joel Valenzuela@TheDesertLynx·
Crypto seed phrases aren't going away for a while. Yes, many complain that they aren't newbie-friendly, and so manynew wallets brag about "no seed phrases." Doesn't matter, they're here to stay. You know why? One word: INTEROPERABILITY. Almost every single crypto wallet solution that deviates from this industry standard creates a product that only works with its own tiny ecosystem. This is especially a problem when you're talking about recovering funds: most modern backup solutions create a critical dependency on a single company, which is a centralized point of failure. On the other hand, seed phrases are universally supported in almost every wallet imaginable, can be backed up in limitless ways (hand-written, typed, copy/pasted, screenshotted, etched into metal, memorized, etc.). This is why even wallets like Tangem and Vultisig that brag about making seed phrases obsolete have had to add in support: because otherwise many would never trust their money to these products. Funny enough, most modern backups use basically the same kind of backup: either encrypted key shares or a physical NFC device. But they make a critical mistake in not making them interoperable with their competitors. This is a key economic issue in the space: most companies don't want to truly innovate and collaborate because they don't want customers to be able to use their products with competitors. That shortsighted approach is why so many peddle useless products while giving up massive market share to their biggest competitor: seed phrases, which are free. So yes, we should have been able to evolve past seed phrases as an industry standard, and we will eventually. Just not for a while, until the space can decide to work together.
Joel Valenzuela tweet media
English
7
3
24
1K
Richard Ward
Richard Ward@Rickardo66·
@ClarkeMicah Peter Hitchens clearly doesn’t understand the difference between a democracy and an unhinged bunch of mentalists who openly support the annihilation of a Nation.
English
6
0
3
7.5K
Peter Hitchens
Peter Hitchens@ClarkeMicah·
Is anyone else struck by the way in which Israel's nuclear weapons, which we all know to exist, are implictly deemed not to be capable of deterring Iran, should Iran obtain nuclear weapons of its own? So, er.......
English
226
151
1.5K
86.4K
Stephen Fleming
Stephen Fleming@StephenFleming·
That’s for a GOOD nuclear weapon. For a crappy one? Stuff 30 kg of a U-235 into one end of an old artillery barrel. Then a bunch of cardboard to add three feet of spacing. Now the other half of the critical mass. Top it off with a wad of C4 and a detonator. Weld a cap on the open end of the barrel. Hide it in a shipping container under a bunch of vegetables. Drive to Tel Aviv. Detonator goes boom, the sliding half of the enriched uranium makes friends with the stationary half, critical mass achieved, big BOOM. Inefficient as hell, but enough to destroy the core of a city.
English
17
7
163
6.4K
Stephen Fleming
Stephen Fleming@StephenFleming·
If you have enriched uranium, you can make a Hiroshima-scale “gun-type” nuclear weapon in a decent machine shop in a weekend. (Note that the USA didn’t even bother to test the “Little Boy” design… we KNEW it would work. Trinity was all about the “Fat Man” implosion design, which is more complex.) So trying to draw a line between “allowing enrichment” and “allowing a nuclear weapon” is just meaningless yammering. It doesn’t relate to the real world.
Joe Kent@joekent16jan19

It appears that the zero enrichment poison pill killed the Islamabad negotiations yesterday. We have 9 more days in this cease fire to fix this, but we must pursue our goals not Israel's. Trump's redline has always been no nuclear weapons for Iran, not zero enrichment. Iran agrees with this and has not sought to develop or obtain a nuke since 2003 but needs to retain the ability to enrich for their "not Saddam but not Qaddafi" policy to work. This makes negotiations between the U.S. & Iran workable as the dispute is on levels of enrichment and monitoring. This is a threat to Israel getting us to do the heavy lifting in the regime change/decapitation war they want. Israel needs us chasing every trace of uranium in Iran because that ensures we stay engaged militarily in Iran, because how do we ever fully make sure Iran can't enrich without taking out the regime? This is the recipe for an endless bloody war or supporting/turning a blind eye to Israel using a WMD on Iran. Restrain Israel, get a deal, open the SOH, focus on saving our Republic, not playing empire.

English
98
144
1.9K
144.2K
Energy Blogger
Energy Blogger@energy_blogger·
Wow! Wow! Big clarification from US Central Command US WILL HAVE NO BLOCKADE for vessels using Omani water to transit Strait of Hormuz US BLOCKADE is only for Iranian ports and transits via Iranian Waters. #Iran
Energy Blogger tweet media
English
8
5
16
6.6K
2ndrew
2ndrew@TrampAbroad1·
@C_Harwick @keccers Pikachu sometimes just says “pika” or “pi” so I think your Pokémon name could just be every word in the dictionary
English
0
0
9
2K
Cameron Harwick 👾🏛
Cameron Harwick 👾🏛@C_Harwick·
Borges Pokemon story where each of us is a Pokemon whose name consists in all the words we speak over our lifetime
English
32
450
3.6K
111.7K
JohnnyNash
JohnnyNash@JohnnyNash77·
I don’t believe there are any mines as of now in the strait of Hormuz. The regime is rattled on the strait of Hormuz and Trump. They know this is the only real card that they have. It is just blackmail again.
English
6
4
59
1.6K
2ndrew
2ndrew@TrampAbroad1·
@MerruX Since when does the losing side get to dictate terms
English
0
0
0
22
Ali
Ali@MerruX·
Vance has proposed their final Terms to Iran. Likely we are headed back to war!!
English
4
3
33
2.2K
Ali
Ali@MerruX·
No deal between Iran and US!! Vance is flying back to US. Talks have failed!!!
English
10
22
106
9.7K
2ndrew
2ndrew@TrampAbroad1·
@krystalball If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of those dominos will fall like a house of cards.
English
0
0
0
46
Krystal Ball
Krystal Ball@krystalball·
NO CARDS! (Other than that one card that pretty much instantly checkmated us)
Krystal Ball tweet media
English
169
366
4.4K
90.4K
Candidly Tiff
Candidly Tiff@tify330·
They told us it was because Dems were in power but now that Dems are out of power they have gone silent. Not surprising at all.
Candidly Tiff tweet media
English
196
1.1K
4.9K
108.7K
Rania Khalek
Rania Khalek@RaniaKhalek·
From now on I’m going to interpret silence from Lebanese officials about Israeli massacres across Lebanon as support for the destruction of their country.
English
41
461
2.4K
19.9K
2ndrew
2ndrew@TrampAbroad1·
@sunraysunray Yknow I’m pretty sure this is actionable defamation. This is the first thing we learned in J-school
English
1
0
9
438
Bhaskar Sunkara
Bhaskar Sunkara@sunraysunray·
If Dana Bash took her responsibility as a journalist seriously, she'd be apologizing to Hasan Piker right now.
Bhaskar Sunkara tweet media
Bobby LaValley@Bobby_LaVallley

CNN's @DanaBashCNN: "Hasan Piker is excusing sexual violence by Hamas terrorists. He also claims Hamas is, quote, 'a thousand times better than Israel.' Hamas is a designated terror organization, not just by the U.S., but by the EU, Canada, Australia, New Zealand."

English
33
190
1.9K
38.1K
2ndrew
2ndrew@TrampAbroad1·
Guys where are the good right wing meltdowns?
English
0
0
0
40