Trevor Bissonette

2K posts

Trevor Bissonette banner
Trevor Bissonette

Trevor Bissonette

@TrevBizz

Founder, Creator , Technical CEO scaling https://t.co/DlV5LEDVlZ https://t.co/vbrnq7fDmp

Katılım Aralık 2021
243 Takip Edilen132 Takipçiler
Trevor Bissonette
Trevor Bissonette@TrevBizz·
People selling ai courses dont want you to know that you can just ask the ai what to ask it to learn how to use it, then copy those questions in the next prompt and get reading and ask follow ups. You're welcome, saved you 100 dollars.
English
1
0
1
9
Trevor Bissonette
Trevor Bissonette@TrevBizz·
@manofbird Honestly trying to put myself in their shoes, if my son just died and someone who only speaks english butchered french to make a statement about it just to please a bunch of strangers who mostly speak english anyways, ide be pretty pissed off.
English
0
0
0
9
Ted Bird 🇮🇱
Ted Bird 🇮🇱@manofbird·
Here’s the deal, hosers. The pushback on the unilingual English statement from Air Canada might seem petty to you, but it cuts deep in Quebec. It’s lazy, tone deaf and disrespectful to Antoine Forest’s family and friends, and it was avoidable. THAT is what diminishes the tragedy.
English
386
78
659
26.5K
Trevor Bissonette
Trevor Bissonette@TrevBizz·
@RobynUrback Why disrespectfully butcher a language you dont speak to attempt to virtue signal? If i were that persons parents ide hate that
English
0
0
0
2
Robyn Urback
Robyn Urback@RobynUrback·
I get why people are rolling their eyes at this (and normally I would too!) but one of the deceased pilots was a francophone from Quebec. It would've been nice if the CEO spoke a few words to his family, in their language
Scott Robertson@sarobertsonca

PM Mark Carney says he is "very disappointed" in Air Canada CEO's English-only message of condolence: "It doesn't matter the circumstances, but particularly in these circumstances, lack of judgment and lack of compassion."

English
789
305
4.8K
241.6K
Trevor Bissonette
Trevor Bissonette@TrevBizz·
@StevenMCole2 @mcuban @DrDiGiorgio Our system is wait lists and maid and what amounts to minimally better than a prison for most seniors in the retirement homes, that this system has created. If you dont know what maid is btw look it up.
English
0
0
1
46
Trevor Bissonette
Trevor Bissonette@TrevBizz·
@StevenMCole2 @mcuban @DrDiGiorgio Hi, Canadian here, i can assure you, our system is not as good as you think. You may think its great that its basically just taxes. Until you need proper top notch non emergency or life threatening anything, then good fuckin luck having anyone see you in the next 5 years
English
1
0
3
589
Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA
Mark, you are getting close to understanding why single payer cannot work. But I fundamentally disagree with the idea that we could ever just "know" costs well enough to make it work. Hayek was right about this. The relevant knowledge is too dispersed, too local, and too dynamic to ever be gathered and priced correctly by central planners. Take basketball. Imagine single payer basketball. The government is the only purchaser of basketball entertainment in all its forms. Fans are not allowed to just buy a ticket to the Mavs game. Instead, a central office decides who gets to attend and hands out tickets based on "need." The central planners also handle the TV deals, merchandising, concessions, and every other revenue stream. Everything goes through the government, with no out of pocket cost to any consumer. Now teams no longer compete for fans on price, experience, convenience, or innovation. They submit cost reports to Washington explaining what it allegedly costs to run a game. But here is the problem. If there is no market price for tickets, media rights, parking, merchandise, or concessions, how exactly do you decide what the game is worth? How do you decide what players should be paid? How do you know whether a courtside seat is underpriced, overpriced, or priced just right? You do not. You are guessing. So bureaucrats step in and decide the approved reimbursement for a regular season game, a playoff game, courtside access, halftime entertainment, parking, and concessions. What happens next? If the approved rates are too low, teams do not magically become leaner and more innovative. They cut where fans can feel it. Fewer games. Worse arenas. Less staff. Delayed upgrades. Lower quality. Longer waits. Less access. Maybe smaller market teams shut down altogether. If the approved rates are too high, you do not get efficiency either. You get lobbying. Every team hires consultants to prove that its fan base is poorer, sicker, more rural, more complex, or otherwise deserving of special payment adjustments. Soon the league is no longer about basketball. It is about coding, compliance, modifiers, subsidies, carveouts, and political influence. Teams make money not by pleasing fans, but by persuading Washington that their costs are uniquely deserving of reimbursement. And once government is the only buyer, there is no real price discovery left. There is only political bargaining disguised as pricing. The Knicks get one deal. Rural teams get another. Old arenas get subsidies. Favored constituencies get carveouts. Every interest group insists that without one more special adjustment the whole sport will collapse. Fans are told this is fair because nobody has to pay at the gate. But of course they still pay. They pay through taxes. They pay through rationing. They pay through fewer choices. They pay in lower quality. They pay by being told which arena they can use, which game they qualify for, and how long they have to wait. That is the key point. Knowing the accounting cost of hosting a basketball game does not tell you the right price of a ticket. Price is not cost. Price emerges from supply, demand, scarcity, quality, preference, and competition. A central planner can know what it "costs" to turn on the lights, pay security, and clean the arena. That still tells him nothing about what a seat is worth to fans, what kind of experience teams should offer, which franchises are efficient, or where new arenas should be built. Healthcare is even less suited to central planning than basketball. It is more heterogeneous, more personal, more local, and far more dependent on dispersed knowledge. The fantasy is always the same: if only the people at the top had better data, they could set the right prices. No, they could not. They would still be guessing, just with nicer spreadsheets.
Mark Cuban@mcuban

Single payer COULD cut cost and improve care but there are 2 fundamental issues. 1. All plans proposed have placed the Sec of HHS in charge of the program. You can't have a political appointee in that position and it's hard to de-politiicize HC in this country 2. They assume that they can get providers and specialists to accept whatever rates they set. You are talking about organizations that in most cases, don't even know their costs. Why ? They don't want to know their costs. For lots of reasons to long to dig into here Proponents of M4A have to first get hospitals to the point where they can define all their costs and do a Bill of Materials for procedures. You can't negotiate a price for all Americans if you don't know what your costs are It's Shark Tank 101. So we get a stalemate. Politicians don't do the work needed. Hospitals and providers avoid the work needed Other countries started on their path to universal care decades and decades ago. When healthcare was much simpler technically and fiscally. If senators won't support the Break Up Big Medicine Bill or anything comparable , there is no chance of getting to single payer. Our politicians don't have the backbone to do what is needed. You can call out all but Hawley and warren. No one else has uttered a syllable in support

English
52
20
184
79K
Trevor Bissonette
Trevor Bissonette@TrevBizz·
@mark_slapinski Rightfully because you believe in the same completely unproven conspiracy theory too? Left, right, you're all fucking delusional lol
English
1
0
0
40
AJAC
AJAC@AJA_Cortes·
Millennial men are in their mids 30 to early 40s now Time to do something heroic There is no one else to rely on.
English
308
502
6.8K
454.1K
Trevor Bissonette
Trevor Bissonette@TrevBizz·
@IamTheImmortal You say that likee its an intellectual thing except the top 50 or so minds on the planet in physics all dont believe in atheism and most believe in some form of God. Literally the people who know the most about what youre mentioning. All of them. Listen to them talk.
English
1
0
0
4
Matt Brown
Matt Brown@IamTheImmortal·
How are people still tricked by this god stuff in 2026? I get it in 1026 when your entire world was a square mile in size. We see 13 billion light years in to the universe now and have science and technology. I don’t get it.
FULL SEND MMA@full_send_mma

UFC middleweight Joe Pyfer reveals finding God and becoming a Christian changed his life “I’ve had a complete 360 change as far as my faith. I had an out of body experience where I was able to see myself in a different light. I want marriage and God at the center of my life”

English
3.6K
271
5.6K
1.5M
Trevor Bissonette
Trevor Bissonette@TrevBizz·
@levandovsky Already did bro:p you refusing to accept it by changing the goal post doesnt count lol but you do you haha idc
English
1
0
0
15
Trevor Bissonette
Trevor Bissonette@TrevBizz·
@levandovsky Just because its not right in front of you doesnt mean its not happening, the intelligence and the physical dexterity and autonomy all exist in machines. Its purely a matter of "lets give this one skates" Buckle up lol
English
1
0
0
15
Trevor Bissonette
Trevor Bissonette@TrevBizz·
@levandovsky Whose agi? 1940s? 1970s? Early 2000's? Or nows? Fyi llms fullfill all but nows which has only changed cause people refuse to accept were there its ok youll see an Optimus bot running on an ai agent one day soon and understand They're already in factories doing what people can
English
1
0
0
18
Trevor Bissonette
Trevor Bissonette@TrevBizz·
@jimstewartson It doesnt need to have emotions or sentience to be generally intelligent. Thats what most people miss.
English
1
0
0
4