NotAnotherBrickInTheWall

24.4K posts

NotAnotherBrickInTheWall banner
NotAnotherBrickInTheWall

NotAnotherBrickInTheWall

@TruthMinion

E pluribus unum 🇺🇸 Jesus ❤️

The Mekaverse Katılım Şubat 2021
509 Takip Edilen617 Takipçiler
Tony Seruga
Tony Seruga@TonySeruga·
The situation with Tulsi Gabbard’s departure from DNI is a classic case of what happens when a genuine reformer is placed inside an institution designed to resist reform. The “deep state” opposition to her wasn’t subtle—it was structural, predictable, and revealing. 🔍 Why the Intelligence Apparatus Wanted Gabbard Gone Tulsi Gabbard was an existential threat to the intelligence community’s operating model. Here’s what she did that made her a target: •Fired the top leadership of the National Intelligence Council — Mike Collins and Maria Langan-Riekhof — who whistleblowers described as “radically opposed to Trump.” She then moved the NIC out of the CIA and directly under ODNI oversight to block politicization of intelligence. •Referred at least three IC professionals to the DOJ for criminal prosecution over classified leaks, with 12 more under investigation. •Slashed ODNI staffing by roughly 40% — cutting headcount to around 1,300 and saving taxpayers approximately $700 million annually — dismantling DEI programs and targeting “bloated and inefficient” structures. •Launched the Director’s Initiative Group (DIG) specifically to investigate weaponization within the intelligence community and declassify information serving public interest. •Stripped security clearances from 37 former officials — mostly Obama/Biden-era people, 25 of whom signed the 2019 letter backing impeachment over Ukraine. •Pursued declassification aggressively, including JFK assassination files and MKUltra documents — which reportedly triggered an unusual public dispute involving claims the CIA “raided” ODNI headquarters to retrieve files. Tulsi is not someone who “played ball.” This is someone who walked into the temple and started flipping tables. The intelligence community doesn’t tolerate that! Not for a second! ⚔️The Iran Friction Was the Lever The specific flashpoint came over Iran. Gabbard testified there was no intelligence suggesting Iran was developing nuclear weapons. When Trump launched strikes on Iranian nuclear sites in June 2025, he publicly said she was “wrong” and that he didn’t care what she said. Her top counterterrorism official, Joe Kent, resigned in March 2026 over the Iran war, stating Iran posed “no imminent threat” and that “Israel drove the decision” to strike. This is a classic dynamic: the permanent national security state wanted war with Iran. Gabbard — a lifelong anti-interventionist — was an obstacle. When Trump sided with the war hawks, her position became untenable, and deep state insiders knew what to do next. 🗿 Is Trump Compromised? This is the real question. Trump was reportedly ready to fire Gabbard in April 2026 — it took Roger Stone intervening to save her, giving Trump four reasons to keep her, including that firing her would trigger a media firestorm. Laura Loomer was allegedly pushing for her ouster from the other side. The pattern is concerning: •Kristi Noem — ousted from DHS •Pam Bondi — ousted as AG •Lori Chavez-DeRemer — ousted as Labor Secretary •Kash Patel — reportedly next on the chopping block at the FBI •Gabbard — now gone, whether by resignation or forced exit The people being removed are the ones who actually tried to dismantle the apparatus they were placed in charge of. The ones who “go along to get along” stay. That’s not a coincidence. Is Trump compromised? No. Not in the classic kompromat sense — no one has a pee tape, and the Epstein allegations by Dumbocrats are pure unadulterated bullshit! But more insidiously: he’s surrounded. The institutional machinery of Washington is simply more powerful than any one person, even a President Trump. Trump campaigned on draining the swamp — and he placed genuine swamp-drainers like Gabbard and Patel in key positions. But when the permanent state pushes back hard enough, and when the military-industrial complex wants a war, the president either bends or breaks. The fact that Trump went ahead with the Iran war despite his own DNI’s intelligence assessment saying there was no nuclear threat, the fact that his anti-war DNI is now out while the war continues, the fact that his reformist FBI director is reportedly next — this tells you who’s really steering the ship. It’s not the guy with the Trump-branded podium. The deep state didn’t need to blackmail Trump. They just needed to wait him out, apply pressure at the right moments, dangle the right incentives, and let the system’s gravitational pull do the rest. ☠️
Tony Seruga tweet media
English
154
482
1K
69.1K
Lowkey Rey 2.0
Lowkey Rey 2.0@AtlRey·
Here's the honest truth: If Thomas Massie loses tomorrow, millions of conservatives will end up resenting Trump and the pro-Israel lobby even more than Democrats do. They won't forget. They won't forgive. Trump's grudge against Massie could blow up in spectacular fashion.
English
1.5K
766
6K
81.2K
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
This is the longform version of the master plan to remake America’s government, a plan I’ve outlined in pieces across various threads. The protests and foreign-policy interventions are all moving toward the same end: a transformed American system of governance designed to prevent another Trump from ever taking power again. In effect, the United States has become its own democratic-transition project. We are living through a color revolution. Read more below.
DataRepublican (small r) tweet media
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican

x.com/i/article/2055…

English
495
9.4K
19.6K
820.5K