World Goyim Unite

The war against Iran was planned for Trump's second term by israel.

Yes, Massie lost. But that doesn't mean the Jew Lobby won. Not really. I mean, sure. If you coordinate the entire neoconservative establishment, mobilize every AIPAC-aligned donor network in the country, retool the Democratic fundraising apparatus for a Republican primary, spend thirty-two million dollars, get the Secretary of Defense to leave his post on the eve of a potential Iran strike to campaign in Kentucky, and run the whole operation with the subtlety of a aircraft carrier in a swimming pool, then you can, in fact, defeat a single congressman in a mid-tier state. Golf clap. Nobody said it couldn’t be done. But here is what they bought with 32 million dollars and the complete abandonment of operational discretion. They bought a front-row, nationally televised demonstration of exactly the power and control that every person you have ever called an antisemite for the last eighty years has alleged you possess. They bought the live-action confirmation of every "antisemitic trope," every Jewish stereotype, and every forbidden observation. It's the moment when enough Americans watched the same thing happen in real time that the gaslighting stopped working. We literally watched the same woman who flew an Israeli spy on her private jet to a hero's welcome in Israel, the same woman who Trump praised in the Israeli Knesset for loving Israel more than the United States, buy a Kentucky Congressman with the full assistance of the U.S. President. The same president stated twice publicly that he does "anything she asks." It looks like she asked for Massey's head on a platter, and the same president who Israel owns like a pet, helped to make it happen. And we all saw it go down in real time. I’ve said all along that this time around, Israel is panicked and scared. They are desperate, because Americans have the lowest view of Israel than at any time since before WWII. We are now at pre-Holocaust levels of common sense. The problem, for them, is existential. And that’s making them make mistakes. Ideally, their political knee-breaking should be done just enough to catch the attention of the politicians, so they get to see what happens when someone opposes AIPAC. But if the entire nation notices, that would be very bad for them, because it would confirm the rumors Ted Cruz says are antisemitic. But with Massey, they took on more than they could chew, and they couldn’t pull off his defeat with just a little effort. They had to give it everything they got. But that was simultaneously enough to get everybody’s attention. And now, the jig is up. You can call that a win in Kentucky if you want. They removed one congressman. They also confirmed everything he was saying in the process. The cat is not just out of the bag. The cat is on the evening news, and 32 million is the price they paid to put it there. Good luck making America forget what it just saw. When Henry Ford published The International Jew, people all over the world wanted an explanation for why every time there was a radical movement disrupting their nation, toppling regimes, and causing societal disruptions, Jews were at the center of it. It was hard not to notice. The International Jew was popular because it resonated with what people all over the world were noticing. These radical, Jewish-led or disproportionately Jewish movements include the Bolshevik Revolution, the Hungarian Soviet Revolution of 1919, various radical movements in the United States (labor unions, the ACLU, and NAACP and numerous race riots, the Hollywood Ten, etc), the Frankfurt School (Cultural Marxism), the Sexual Revolution (Hirschfield, Reich, etc), the more radical components of the Psychological Revolution, the transgender movement, the Communist movement in Germany, Poland, and Romania, the Feminist movement, the Popular Front in France, Che Guevara in Cuba and Boliva (his entire inner circle was Jewish), and the Communist movemet in South Africa. The Protocols of Zion gave people something to hold on to and say, “This explains it.” Because the Jewish diaspora was global, and the radical movements all over the world had Jews at their epicenter, people naturally assumed there was a coordinated global conspiracy. Protocols made sense to people. So did Ford's book. Drawing on the Protocols of Zion, Henry Ford produced some accusations about international Jewry that look awfully familiar to folks who just watched a primary race in Kentucky. Ford alleged that Jewish financial networks operated across national borders as a unified interest bloc, deploying money into host nation politics to purchase outcomes favorable to Jewish collective interests regardless of their party. Ford alleged that the politician who gets removed fastest in American political life is the one who questions things emanating from Jewish sources. Ford alleged that campaign finance investigations never go deep enough to trace the international sources of political money. Ford alleged that the charge of antisemitism functions not as a genuine defense against hatred but as a political silencing mechanism, deployed strategically to end arguments rather than answer them. Ford alleged that Jewish financial power in America was concentrated in banking, media, and law, and that this concentration gave Jewish interests structural leverage over American politics disproportionate to their numbers. Ford alleged that American presidents are selected and controlled through blackmail over hidden scandals. Epstein and Mossad, anyone? Wow. All of these "Islamo-Leftist conspiracy theories," as James Lindsay calls them, sure seem identical to those from 100 years ago that were held universally by virtually all anti-Communists (which is, ironically, what Lindsay claims to be). Sure, there's a chance Ford might have been guilty of over-simplification or slight exaggeration here or there. There’s probably no official Jewish shadow government that has effectively replaced all national governments worldwide. Just enough to make it look that way. After all, Jews are heads of state all around the world, from Ukraine to Mexico. But what did Ford know? And then there's the supervillains, from Soros to Epstein to Miriam Adleson. But what did Ford know? It's just new-fangled Islamo-Leftist conspiracy theories. From more than 100 years ago. When you tell people that a claim is pure hateful fabrication, and they pull the thread and find something more complicated than that, you have not protected them from dangerous ideas. You have handed them a reason to distrust everything you say from that point forward. The person who discovers that something dismissed as antisemitic tripe is actually true, they do not respond with careful recalibration. They respond by wondering what else he was told was an antisemitic trope is actually something true.

Jewish Congressman from Ohio, Max Miller, introduced a bill to extend military benefits to "US citizens" who serve in the IDF. This highlights the problem with Jews: we entrust them to serve all Americans, yet they serve their fellow Jews. We entrust them to pursue the common good, yet they pursue "what's good for Jews." Time and time again, they break our trust to serve their tribal interest at our expense. When the Jewish plywood salesman from Minnesota, Rudy Boschwitz, was entrusted with a seat in the US Senate, he used his station to propose legislation to repeal the controversial 1975 UN resolution that classified Zionism as racism. He was clearly serving his tribal interest since, after his tenure as Senator, he joined the boards of various Jewish interest groups like the ADL, JINSA, and AIPAC to help advance Jewish interests. Needless to say, Boschwitz was a card-carrying Zionist. Henry Ford wrote about the peril of entrusting Jews with such powerful positions on account of their propensity to abuse their power for Jewish ends. Specifically, Ford wrote about Bernard Baruch's appointment as Commissioner to the War Industries Board during WW1. Baruch was responsible for allocating materials like steel and copper to private businesses when these materials were in high demand by the US government for the war. Ford noted that Baruch denied the construction of several schools but approved the construction of a large theater owned by a Jew. Can Jews be trusted to make decisions independent of their identity – independent of what's good for Jews? Or does "Jewishness" inform every decision a Jew makes? The best answer to this question comes from Jewish Congressman from Wyoming, Andy Schwartz, who succeeded in defeating a bill that would've banned critical race theory in schools. His rationale was that the bill would've required schools to present the Holocaust in a neutral manner, which was objectionable to him. Andy said: "In this bill, page 9, line 19 states, ‘The teaching of history must be neutral, without judgment.' Now, how can that be possible? If I were a Native American, I doubt I could accept the neutral, judgment-free approach about the relocation, the decimation of the Indigenous population. If I were a Black American, I doubt I could accept a neutral, judgment-free approach on the enslavement of millions of Americans. But I’m Jewish, and I cannot accept a neutral judgment-free approach on the murder of 6 million Jews in World War Two. Going to page 8, lines 19 and 20, it says ‘no one should feel discomfort or distress. But in learning about the Holocaust, I have suffered a lifetime of discomfort and distress, and it’s essential that as students learn about this dark time in our history, they to feel discomfort in distress." In other words, Jews make decisions as Jews, not as Americans, not as individuals, and not as neutral legislators.

Israeli diplomat brags about turning European cities into criminal ghettos by flooding them with Black immigrants. They don’t even hide it anymore.

When General Patton found out about the 2m+ German prisoners of war held in the Rheinwiesen open-air death camps - all to be killed by daily slow deliberate reductions in their meagre food rations - he protested. Soon he had a car accident. He survived it and was hospitalised. Then some MPs visited him. He was found dead soon after.

@lampshades_2 x.com/i/status/20576…

—Disproportionate Jewish influence: Lindbergh claimed Jews possessed excessive control over key American institutions, particularly motion pictures, the press, radio, and parts of government, which he saw as a threat to the country. —Pushing America into war: He accused Jews of being one of the three main groups (alongside the British and Roosevelt administration) actively pressuring the U.S. to enter WWII against Germany, prioritizing Jewish interests over American ones. —Dual loyalty and foreign interests: Lindbergh portrayed Jews as having primary loyalty to their race and international Jewish concerns rather than to America, describing them as “not American in interests and viewpoints.” —Racial characteristics and overrepresentation: He suggested that Jews, as a distinct race, tended to create problems when their population percentage became too high in a country, referencing their visibility in certain professions and areas as a source of tension.

@scientificecon Many people noticed the truth. x.com/i/status/20575…

@Mofobian x.com/i/status/20575…

@Mofobian General George S. Patton knew (((who))) controls our press.

How General George S. Patton was silenced.

@Mofobian x.com/i/status/20575…

@mtgreenee x.com/i/status/20578…

It’s not an antisemitic conspiracy theory when a foreign lobby openly brags that they bought two congressional seats with candidates who will be loyal to Israel.

@IanMalcolm84 @buckleycarlson x.com/i/status/20570…

Tucker noticed. We have won. This madness will end. Much love to @buckleycarlson who, certainly, played a huge part in this seismic shift.

@scientificecon "If people have time to read anything besides the number of points which will get a soldier home, I will probably make the front page, but, frankly, do not give a damn." - General George S. Patton

@scientificecon "They have utterly lost the Anglo-Saxon conception of justice and feel that a man can be kicked out because somebody else says he is a Nazi. They were evidently quite shocked when I told them I would kiek nobody out without the successful proof of guilt before a court of law."

Francis Fukuyama on the U.S. as a declining power: American decline is a direct product of Trump's rise since 2016. It is as if Trump had decided to do everything in his power to weaken the United States vis-à-vis China. He has polarized an already polarized country, cut funding for basic scientific research, and attacked American universities which are the best in the world. He and his colleagues have openly stated that their domestic opponents — the Democrats — are a far greater threat to the future of the United States than either China or Russia. There is agreement among America's friends and rivals that the United States has become something of a rogue state that is contributing to global instability and disorder — as well as something of a laughingstock.

Why is this so catchy? What does it mean? I need to know. I’ve been singing it everywhere.

CIA was tracking DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s team, including allegedly monitoring every keystroke on their government computers and devices, per Catherine Herridge.

@ky_statesman @TulsiGabbard x.com/i/status/20578…

I hope @TulsiGabbard sings like a bird.

Everyone should respect this decision by Thomas Massie. He has given enough. His family has given enough. We both have. It’s up to the American people, it’s your country, and you can’t expect only a few of us to sacrifice ourselves. Step up.