

Umesh Sharma
56 posts

























Actually, we entrepreneurs are the market economy’s outcome. Neither capitalism is perfect nor socialism solves the world’s miseries. It is always the market based economy that gives the opportunity to serve and build to everyone equally ! In a market-driven economy, the government can build; any one else who has some POV can build (Make half-hour deliveries or shorter; the market decides the winner.) or entrepreneurs can build. This is the modern India, we see being built in last 10 years. What you can’t pause/kill is the flow of the progress or market. That will stop the economy growth which took so long to start ! When capital decides policies, it is capitalism. When collectivism prevails, it is socialism. When the market decides, it is a market economy. Today, India is the world’s best market economy and is thriving. We have to protect it from any vested interest of the short term (typically commercial/politics) or long-term intents (typically geo-politics). I am for a thriving Indian market, which attracts its own best talent to build world-class companies in India and then expand to rule global markets. ✨






Deepinder is right but very few people will agree to this. We have a Myntra warehouse right next door and it was buzzing today like every day, no one was on a strike or dharna. A lot of the kids who work there are in between jobs when they are unable to find anything else suitable. Are the hours long, yes. But it is still optional it is not bonded labour. People asking for a fixed salary really don't understand how this works. Should we demand better work conditions of course. But saying pay min salary is a slippery slope tbh. The question is simple if there were higher paying alternatives wouldn't they have taken it. The fact is there are none, so this is a good step till they upgrade themselves and find better paying full time jobs.







I did not explain the Gravity Aging Hypothesis (GAH) well, the first time. I brought my consumer internet brain into a deep scientific field and I miscommunicated. I tried to compress years of research and thinking into a dramatic social media reveal. That made the hypothesis sound absolute and commercial – while it’s really not. I apologise. This is me taking a slower, cleaner shot at explaining GAH, without oversimplifying it. (1/7)