Your Favorite Uh-Count

Can anyone explain why comic Dave Smith and Tucker Carlson are called out for being divisive, but Lindsay Graham, an actual U.S. Senator with sway over the federal budget, and Trump, can call for an Iwo Jima level war and nobody yelling about Tucker cares?

So, who is excited for Lockdowns 2.0 ?

Yes, white men in 2026 are a great deal more oppressed than black men in 1826. Black men in 1826 were given free food and housing. White men in 2026 are denied resources as aggressively as possible. Black men in 1826 had a place to escape to. White men in 2026 face a global institutionalized genocide with nowhere safe to run. Black men in 1826 were thought of as inferior and forced into the lowest social class. White men in 2026 are again institutionally portrayed as inferior, forced into the lowest rung of society, told that we have no right to exist, are labeled with words like "Nazi" which means "worst possible person," and we are imprisoned and killed if we try to speak up about this. Black men in 1826 would be safe and well-fed if they did what they were told. White men in 2026, even if we do what we are told, we can be attacked in our homes by blacks and illegals who are not supposed to be in our countries at all, and if we defend ourselves the law will throw the book at us. We are not allowed to even be safe and at peace even if we slavishly obey. Black men in 1826 eventually grew into the wealthiest group of blacks in the world. White men in 2026 are going extinct in our own countries while being forced to pay for Somalians to have 20 kids apiece. I could go on, and you know this very well. Once again, you were already aware of all of these things, and you are pretending not to be because you are a stupid, evil, dirty rat, and you are emotionally, financially, and genetically committed to assisting in White genocide, having what looks to be a Chinese wife and kids. You only make yourself look stupid by trying to deny it.

White people have a right to exist

"U.S. can no longer be the sole author of the terms, we have to share power with China." Tucker:

🚨BREAKING: 175 Israelis wounded in Iranian missile strikes on southern Israel last night, according to Soroka Hospital. From the impact in Arad, 115 people were injured — including 9 in serious condition, with 31 hospitalized, among them 18 children. From the strike in Dimona, 60 were wounded, including a 12-year-old in critical condition who underwent surgery and a man in his 20s moderately injured. Iran’s missile attacks are once again targeting civilian areas — including children — across Israel.

But to answer your question, even though your dodging the discussion here, yes I think the oppression of white men in contemporary America is worse than what black slaves went through in America. I would argue that the fact black slaves had a lower suicide rate than white men today largely speaks to this. Clearly the institutional pressure against Whites is more destructive on them than slavery was for blacks.

Simulation theory is like "finding god" for the atheists. The problem and the reason why so many people cringe at the idea of "god" is because popular religion and mass organized religion deconstructed the idea of "God" into a literal cartoon bearded man in the sky that looks like humans and has the same psychology... and treat bible verses as concrete atomized concepts that has no relation to the chapter or to the whole. Thomas Aquinas, perhaps one of the most intelligent men to live, said it best in Summa Theologica. God is the pure spirit with zero body, zero parts, zero location, zero time... almost like a hologram that exists in all space and time at once and nothing at the same time. The essence of existence itself God isn't something human beings can comprehend, just like an amoeba can't comprehend quantum physics. We can't even ask the right questions of reality, and maybe the best we can come up with is "simulation theory"... but even that has a problem of infinite regression of the simulators themselves being simulated themselves and so on. Simpler people think that humans "look like God," but Genesis doesn't say we look like God. It says we were made in HIS image, after HIS likeness. God is the rational soul... specifically ties into our intellect: the power to know, reason, the logos... and will, the power to love and choose freely between good and evil. That's the "image", not something stupid like a mirror selfie, but a real, participatory likeness that's beyond a simple picture. In Christian theology, specifically, this is the idea that god made sub-creators as humans who can ponder creation itself and, in doing so, we humans dimly reflect the ONE who just is existence. This is why Christianity, in its sophisticated form, invites us, humans, towards discovering god's design... and this was precisely why the scientific revolution was born out of the Christian tradition and nowhere else. This is why almost all of the scientists who were godfathers of modern science... Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Newton, Boyle, Maxwell... were Christian... and even people like Fermi and Einstein were deeply spiritual in the same tradition, even if they weren't specifically "Christian" . Here, the implication is that the language of mathematics itself is a small fraction of god's design. This is why high-IQ people arrive at the same conclusion as the low-IQ people of the uncaused cause. High IQ people see the beauty in the logos, in reason, the rational order, and in math, and see a fractional glimpse of god's design. Low IQ people accept god as the default of existence because they intuit it without reason. It's the midwits who claim atheism because they can't fathom religious thought to be anything sophisticated... classic Dunning-Kruger effect applied to metaphysics

Joe Kent on why we actually went to war with Iran.

The AAMD (now AAIDD) revised its 1973 manual: IQ cutoff dropped from ~85 (1 SD below mean, + "borderline" category labeling ~15-16% of population) back to ~70 (2 SD, ~2%). Official rationale: reduce overdiagnosis/stigmatization of mildly low scorers who weren't functionally impaired; emphasize adaptive behavior deficits alongside IQ. Secondary sources note it responded to civil rights concerns over disproportionate labeling of minority students (mainly Black Americans, whose group mean IQ is ~85) in special ed. This sharply cut eligibility for services.