viswaMitra007

@hellonehha After years in this corporate, so called software etc, i realized ultimately what matters is power. The taste and beauty of Power and Influence Triumps all

read this thread. there was a time when I was also thinking to focus on my calligraphy and art skills but glad I didn't. life runs on money and not on passion. I also need money to run my passion. but this is about me..if someone can make their life out of their passion...please do it. You have God's blessing.

@TeluguMaverick UK lo majority whites vadili denkutunnaru ee christian matanni...vallani adigitey cheptaaru asalu christianity rangu ento...3 rojula tarvata lechina christ malli enduku padukunnadu...ala lechi oka 20 years batakochhu kada...

క్రిస్టియన్ అమ్మాయిలు హిందూ పండగలు, దీపావళి లాంటివి చేసుకోవాలని ఆరాట పడుతున్నారు , అలా చేస్తే యేసు క్రీస్తు మిమ్మల్ని నరకం లో పడేస్తాడు 😳

@ihtesham2005 @grok is ge the same weiner who created/solved geometric brownian motion equation. I mean weiners processess ?

A child prodigy who finished his Harvard degree at 14 and his PhD at 17 sat down in 1948 and wrote a single book that invented the entire conceptual vocabulary we still use to talk about AI, robotics, self-driving cars, and reinforcement learning. He never got the credit. Most people have never heard his name. His name was Norbert Wiener. The book was called Cybernetics. Every feedback loop running inside every system you interact with today traces back to one problem he was handed during World War II. The problem was this: how do you aim a gun at a fast-moving airplane? By the time your shell arrives, the plane is somewhere else. You cannot aim at where the plane is. You have to aim at where the plane will be. And the plane's pilot, knowing this, is constantly changing course to make that prediction wrong. Wiener spent years on this. What he built to solve it was not a better gun. It was a new science. He noticed something that nobody had formally described before. The gun system and the human nervous system were solving the same problem using the same method. You observe where the target is. You compare it to where you want to hit. You calculate the gap. You correct. You observe again. He called that loop feedback. Not in the casual sense people use it today. In the precise mathematical sense. A signal goes out. The result comes back. The system compares the result to the goal. The gap between them drives the next action. The loop closes. That mechanism, exactly as Wiener described it in 1948, is what runs inside every thermostat, every autopilot, every cruise control system, and every AI training loop on the planet right now. When GPT-4 learned to answer questions better, it was doing feedback. When AlphaGo learned to play Go, it was doing feedback. When a self-driving car adjusts its steering because it drifted two inches toward the curb, it is doing feedback. The word they all use, the concept underneath the word, the mathematics formalizing the concept, all of it came from one book written by a child prodigy in 1948 who was trying to figure out how to shoot down a plane. The deeper insight was what he proved about living systems and machines. Before Wiener, biology and engineering were treated as completely separate domains. Organisms adapted. Machines calculated. The idea that you could describe both using the same mathematical framework was not just unusual. It was considered a category error. Wiener proved it anyway. He showed that a brain correcting a reaching movement and a missile correcting its trajectory were running mathematically identical control loops. The hardware was different. The math was the same. Living systems and engineered systems obeyed the same laws once you understood what those laws actually were. He named the field after the Greek word for steersman. Kubernetes. Cybernetics. The person who holds the rudder, reads the water, and adjusts constantly to hold a course through a current that is always pushing the ship somewhere else. That is the mental image he wanted. Not a machine that executes instructions. A system that responds to its own results. The third thing he did is the part almost nobody connects to modern AI. In 1948, Wiener spent an entire chapter of Cybernetics warning about what would happen when machines that learn from feedback were given control over consequential decisions. He described the displacement of workers not as a distant possibility but as a near-term certainty. He wrote about the ethical risks of building systems that optimize for measurable proxies of human values rather than actual human values. He described in plain language what alignment researchers today call Goodhart's Law without using that name, 25 years before Charles Goodhart published anything. He was a mathematician in 1948 writing about problems that AI safety researchers are still trying to solve in 2026. The book is dense in places. The equations are real and the sections on statistical mechanics require actual attention. But Wiener knew this, which is why in 1950 he published The Human Use of Human Beings, which is the same book with all the math removed. Same ideas. Same warnings. Written for anyone who reads English. That second book has been in print for 75 years and almost nobody in tech has read it. Wiener died in 1964 at a conference in Stockholm. He collapsed mid-conversation between sessions. He was 69. He did not live to see a personal computer. He did not live to see the internet. He never saw reinforcement learning, neural networks, or the AI systems that run almost entirely on the mathematical architecture he designed while trying to solve a World War II gunnery problem. Every AI lab in the world today is building systems that run on his framework. Almost none of the people building those systems know his name. The field he founded, cybernetics, mostly disappeared as a word. The ideas did not disappear. They dissolved into every other field. Control theory. Cognitive science. Computer science. Neuroscience. AI. They each took a piece of what he built and called it their own terminology. The word that survived is the one that proves he invented it. Feedback. You use it every day. You use it in code reviews, in meetings, in conversations about AI performance. Every time you use it in the technical sense, meaning a signal that closes a loop between output and goal, you are using the exact definition Wiener wrote down in 1948. He gave the word its meaning. Most people using it have never heard of him. The Human Use of Human Beings is free on archive. Cybernetics is in print and available anywhere books are sold. His major essays are in academic archives at no cost. The man who built the foundation of modern AI was writing about its dangers before the first commercial computer existed. Most people building AI today have never read a word he wrote.

@vijaythirumalai @grok why indian companies are so un inmovative. What could be potential bets Lakshmi machibe works and Murugappa could take that make them world leaders

So good and very well written. However one point which is my biggest grouse is Indian capitalists have endless SIP $ which can parallel only US $ One just needed imagination to buy this company for a song, SBI will finance it with like 90% debt You could buy the German company, get the manufacturing ops to India and list in India, easy 10x Who could have done it, Lakshmi Machine works or a Murugappa or any other Coimbatore based company for example, not even that expensive, equity layout is < Camelia So IMO the capitalists lack imagination and are 95% problem, Indian society / govt 5% max

@keystonehabitee Swayamkrushi Pilla Zamindar Bhairava dweepam

ఎన్నిసార్లు చూసినా బోర్ కొట్టని ఒక మూవీ పేరు చెప్పండి 🤌

@abhijeetpushkar Not only indian, no government does that

Dear Sebi and the Indian government. You put a disclaimer that 90% of FnO traders make losses. Players like Jane street sit their and manipulate the markets and are the cause of losses of retail traders. They are manipulating the market at will on every expiry and the government is not waking up to this.

@waqas03 Your last two sentences are gold. The moment man removes his sexual urges while approaching women, unconsious edge that a woman has is gone. Man can triumph women in any pursuit on the planet if he choses to...

Men should understand that if you remove the sexual fantasies, 90% of women are third class humans with no personality but high grade manipulation. The sooner you understand the better you will see though their disgusting moves known as tantrums. Always select woman based on your long term endevours and personality. Introduce your self well. Expose yourself well, and i am sure only the compatible one will remain...

Higher US rates (or rising 10Y yields) make US Treasuries more attractive vs riskier emerging market assets like Indian equities. FIIs repatriate capital for better risk-adjusted returns, stronger USD, and safer haven flows. This triggers selling in India, rupee pressure, and market correction. Classic parallel: 2013 Taper Tantrum. Fed signaled QE taper → US yields spiked → massive outflows from India (rupee hit record low ~69), stocks tanked, RBI had to defend with rate hikes and FX intervention. Similar dynamics played out in 2022 Fed hiking cycle.

@udaykotak @grok explain why increase in US interest rates trigger exodus of funds from indian stock market. Can you draw parallels to any such historic events

A crucial macro factor today is US 10 year bond yields. They have moved up from 4.16% on January 1, to 4.60%. It reflects increasing strain for US borrowing program as US debt nears $ 40 trn. When the US sneezes, world gets a cold. Watch out for bond yields around the world.

@piersmorgan Cucks like you are the reason for destroying UK.. how horrible you shoukd be for destroying your own country

50,000? Wow.. so that’s 2,950,000 fewer than Robinson claimed were on his last march. Poor Tommy, that’s utterly humiliating. Hope he’s OK. 🙏

@bbhandarii @BhagwaanUvacha Why only gender diversity ? Why not other categories of diversity ?

intellectuals after literally butchering meritocracy at mba colleges:

@sukumoon_ Why 5 years...is it not now ?

Highly educated women will be completely out of the Indian Marriage Market in the next 5 years and House Wife will be the next big demand by men.

@Shirink_13 Indian muslims most of them are cheap converts. Those arabs are original...so duplicate aur original mein farak tho jota na bhai

Hugging Muslims in the UAE, why hate Muslims in india?

@HLKodo @KDRposts Who is the girl destroyed him ?

Have no idea about the facts but Ravi Mohan press meet is the scariest, saddest and the most disturbing things i have seen in the recent times.

@ShinMarginalScr Bengali muslims were given a country...they shoukd shrug being parasites and let hindus live peacefully...

This is genuinely horrific. In West Bengal, Muslims on average, have worse indicators than some of the larger Scheduled Caste communities. OBC reservations are one way to ensure social mobility. Denying them that is socioeconomic violence.

@dmuthuk Why you guys want industries ? You have enough work at your hand to Eradicate Sanathana Dharma no ? Ve on it...lemurs of highest order

We cannot afford to lose our competitiveness to achieve $1 trillion GDP by 2030. Andhra Pradesh is very aggressively competing for every single investment. Good for them. We need to be strongly focused on our growth.

@5UM8O Finally are you building temple or not ?

In our society we are making a Temple. There are 8 muslim families here. We had to overcome endless complaints from Hindus. None of the muslims. While 80% of the society donated, an entire Keralite group of Hindus did not. Kerala Hindus are on edge. Kerala is new Kashmir.

@NoSoyElGato @venom1s Still he violated Gandhian principles.... however ending was satisfactory to me 😂😂😂😂

@VMitra007 @venom1s He didn't stand a chance because that woman always hit him on the same cheek. 😂

> A boy came out of the lift. > A girl was standing right in front. > He accidentally bumped into her. > He apologized, but she kept slapping him. > He then beat her up. Why do women think they can get away with beating men?

@CaptainInsightX I will pick one & only - Legend Linus

4 engineers who shaped modern software. You get 1 as your mentor for a year. Pick one. -DHH (creator of Ruby on Rails, CTO of 37signals) -John Carmack (creator of Doom, ex-CTO Oculus) -Linus Torvalds (creator of Linux & Git) -Guillermo Rauch (CEO of Vercel, creator of Next.js) Who are you picking, and why?