
VRadha
117.9K posts






The controversy just got deeper. What began as a courtroom clash has now turned into a sensitive debate on judicial propriety. Arvind Kejriwal has, in a fresh affidavit before the Delhi High Court, raised concerns over a possible “appearance of conflict of interest” involving Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma’s family and the role of Tushar Mehta. The claim? That the same legal ecosystem representing the prosecuting side is also connected to how work is allocated to the judge’s immediate family members. Importantly, Kejriwal stops short of alleging actual bias—but argues that even the perception of it could impact fairness. He has also flagged a procedural concern, stating he was denied a fair opportunity to present his rejoinder arguments. So, is this merely a question of perception, or a serious test for judicial transparency and ethics? As the legal battle intensifies, all eyes are now on how the court responds. @AamAadmiParty @ArvindKejriwal @msisodia #legalnews #latestnews #judiciary #delhihighcourt

आम आदमी पार्टी के नेता के यहाँ तीन दिन में ये दूसरी ED की रेड है। क्या प्रधान मंत्री जी बतायेंगे कि अभी तक “आप” नेताओं के यहाँ जो इतनी सारी अनगिनत रेड की हैं, उनमे कितना काला पैसा मिला? एक रुपया भी मिला? पूरा देश देख रहा है कि आप केवल सत्ता के लिए कितनी ओछी राजनीति कर रहे हैं।

By Arvind Kejriwal logic, no judge can hear cases against government, politicians: CBI opposes recusal plea Read here: barandbench.com/news/by-arvind…
















