Bill Sweetman
40.1K posts

Bill Sweetman
@ValkStrategy
Strategy, risk analysis, OSINT, communications and advocacy. 40+ years in media, seven in industry, global perspective. Blocks limited to anonymous triflers.

I’m not really sure what the point of this article is. More stringent safety precautions? Everyone now wears a bib and a football helmet? We slow down acquisitions to the old ways where it takes so long to field something that it becomes obsolete before it ever gets employed? Or is it just to paint the Pentagon as reckless and cavalier? Using some memo from an overzealous “safety” assessment as ammo for the argument? Spoiler alert: any civilian with a safety job in the military has the risk tolerance of a…. idk.. insert metaphor of something with zero risk tolerance. I mean, thanks for the heads up I guess. I’ll give you a few clicks here. But this article gives me helicopter parent vibes. It feels like I’m getting a limp wristed handshake from someone who doesn’t get out much. Like the kind where I have to wipe my hand on my shirt to get the “ick” off after I walk away.







The case for Trump's bloated Pentagon budget, to the degree there is one, is that military competition with China will be expensive. But now Trump's basically said we're not going to contest China near its borders. So what's the $1.5trillion for? Blowing up drug smuggling boats?



It's perfectly evident that the 4,000-troop armored brigade headed to Poland was canceled with no warning to our key allies, no consultation with Congress, and without (or against) the advice of our military. A dangerous, amateurish decision that undercuts our national security.



Wait till he finds out Homer is fictional too.

i’m sure we’ll all be fine



Starmer weighs up his future amid fury at 'betrayal' by his Cabinet - The Times's weekend read: * Starmer is spending weekend at Chequers. Friends say that for all the rhetoric about not walking away and public displays of defiance he is seriously considering setting out a timeline for his departure * He feels betrayed by senior figures in the Cabinet who owe their jobs to his landslide majority and his decision to appoint them to high office in the first place * The Times's disclosure that ministers had called for him to set out a timeline for his departure is a particular source of fury. 'It was unforgiveable,' one ally said * The Cabinet consensus is that Starmer has to go - it's just a question of when and how. 'The local election results show that he has lost the country and his speech proved he didn’t have the ability to turn it around,' one Cabinet minister said. 'We’re in a world where it’s either Andy or Wes now.” * Some members of the Cabinet say it will be a coronation for Burnham if he defeats Reform in Makerfield. “If Andy wins Makerfield he will be carried aloft into the Westminster tearooms on the shoulders of Labour MPs. There is simply not a world in which he doesn’t win the leadership so it must be a coronation — because the last thing we need is a damaging leadership battle.” * The briefings against Starmer are increasingly vicious. One senior Labour MP compared him to Gordon Brown, the former Labour prime minister, and accused him of 'squatting' in Number 10. 'It's over, he's in denial' * Some think Starmer has a duty to play caretaker and unifier. “If Burnham wins he needs to preside over a unifying moment for the party and bring the two sides together. It is a lot to ask of him, but it is an essential role. He cannot leave us in such a chaotic state. If he vacates the pitch and lets them fight among themselves it will be a disaster. Someone has to act as a unifier.” * Streeting has not given up on the leadership and will join any contest * For Starmer, the next month threatens to be humiliating. Most of the Cabinet are likely to go out and campaign for Burnham, the man expected to replace him if he wins. All of which could leave him out of power after less than two years in No 10 thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…

Man, Xi must have scared the hell out of him


Trump on Taiwan: When you look at the odds, China is very, very powerful, big country. That's a very small island. Think of it, it's 59 miles away. We're 9500 miles away. That's a little bit of a difficult problem. Taiwan was developed because we had presidents that didn't know what the hell they were doing. They stole our chip industry.








