Gary Vanover

36 posts

Gary Vanover

Gary Vanover

@Vanover1970

Katılım Eylül 2025
10 Takip Edilen2 Takipçiler
aimkey
aimkey@aimkeyx·
they need to nerf this augment asap, you shouldnt be able to crawl infinitely to any hatch on the map
aimkey tweet media
English
706
6
674
222.6K
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@ArcRaiderAlerts I have thought for months now……. What if there were another place like Sporanza with its own maps as well. At some point the 2 would clash or even begin bleeding over into each others maps, fighting and competing for resources. That would be a good stage for all out PvP
English
0
0
0
3.6K
ARC Raiders Alerts
ARC Raiders Alerts@ArcRaiderAlerts·
BREAKING: ARC Raiders is reportedly getting dedicated PvE and PvP only modes on April 20, 2026, with a 20v20 Ground War mode planned for later this year! This was confirmed by noted insider Rick Astley, who claims the project is internally codenamed 'Never Gonna Give You Up.'
ARC Raiders Alerts tweet media
English
439
454
5K
559.6K
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@ArcRaidersInfo This isn’t true. My wife is PvE only. Has done less than 30 points ding to a raider and 0 knocks. She still gets PvP people in some of her lobbies. PvE only is not 100% guaranteed EVER.
English
7
0
12
3.7K
ARC Raiders Informer
ARC Raiders Informer@ArcRaidersInfo·
*UPDATED* How to easily get PVE ONLY lobbies in Arc Raiders! 🙌 - Play 4-6 matches without harming a raider - You can ONLY shoot Arcs - Let other raiders kill you no matter what - Killing or downing a raider immediately breaks the streak SAVE FOR LATER 🔥
ARC Raiders Informer tweet media
English
217
121
2.2K
246.8K
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@RJNnetwork @ArcRaidersInfo This isn’t true. My wife is PvE only. Has done less than 30 points ding to a raider and 0 knocks. She still gets PvP people in some of her lobbies. PvE only is not 100% guaranteed EVER.
English
2
0
0
892
RJ
RJ@RJNnetwork·
@ArcRaidersInfo but but but but embark said this isn’t true and isn’t how the matchmaking works!! 🤣
English
5
0
47
18.3K
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@DisNagger @SteamTrader @ArcRaidersInfo I agree with you that a rule about abusive language because of it being subjective could itself be abused. That’s why it’s enforcement should not be what I feel as abusive or you feel as abusive. More so it should be what is deemed abusive according to the agreement we entered.
English
0
0
0
13
Super Nagger
Super Nagger@DisNagger·
@Vanover1970 @SteamTrader @ArcRaidersInfo With 'rules are rules' we wouldnt have a debate about anything. The question OP poses is what people think of said rule or whether it should exist. Also, Verbal Abuse is inherently subjective, its hard to enforce such culturally and contextually idiosyncratic rules.
English
2
0
0
27
ARC Raiders Informer
ARC Raiders Informer@ArcRaidersInfo·
Should players in Arc Raiders that verbally abuse other players in game chat receive bans/temporary game chat bans?
ARC Raiders Informer tweet media
English
660
10
457
108.8K
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@DisNagger @SteamTrader @ArcRaidersInfo Yes, but there have been codes of conduct governing online. Chat all the way back to text base chat with online gaming. Abusive languages, subjective at times. So the question should be what is embark’s definition of abusive language because it is their code of conduct.
English
1
0
0
20
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@DisNagger @SteamTrader @ArcRaidersInfo I did not miss the point of the discussion. I simply say that if we agreed to the code of conduct. Which we all had to to install and be able to play the game. Then violations of said code of conduct should be enforced. A law or rule that is not enforced, is not a law or rule.
English
1
0
0
18
Super Nagger
Super Nagger@DisNagger·
@Vanover1970 @SteamTrader @ArcRaidersInfo I think you missed the point of this discussion. We all know its part of the code of conduct, the debate is whether it should be, or should be enforced. Considering Abuse can be a very wide range of things. And of course its censorship wdym. just cause its ToS doesnt mean its not
English
2
0
0
33
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@DisNagger @SteamTrader @ArcRaidersInfo Then, apparently you don’t understand what actual censorship is. They are not controlling, banning, editing any public speech. The code of conduct is a requirement to play the game and be part of the community just like a dress code for some restaurants.
English
1
0
0
7
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@SteamTrader @ArcRaidersInfo It’s not censorship. Although that’s an interesting way to try to manipulate the narrative. It is a code that we all agree to upon installing and playing the game. Enforcing that code of conduct much like enforcing laws is the solution.
English
1
0
0
87
ARC Trader
ARC Trader@SteamTrader·
@ArcRaidersInfo Absolutely not. Censorship is never the solution. If you're unable to ignore or get past it, you can mute proximity chat. Individual solution.
English
15
3
292
5.8K
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@Level9Labs @ArcRaidersInfo In fact, codes of conduct to govern toxicity, harassment, and hate speech have long been a standard in online gaming. The gaming community I don’t think has gotten softer or harder, but instead has just become more accessible so that now it includes a much larger group of people
English
0
0
0
4
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@Level9Labs @ArcRaidersInfo Me, I don’t care what someone says. I’ll talk bad as anyone. However, harassment and hate speech actually go against Embark code of conduct for Arc Raiders. We all agreed to it when we installed and played the game. I know, most people don’t read what they agree to.
English
1
0
0
38
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@CyberVapor1978 Read the actual statement. There’s nothing against witty banter. It specifically says abusive. There’s a difference. The ban that is recommended is for abusive chat that goes against the code of conduct we agreed to. You can trash talk without being abusive. There’s a difference
English
0
0
0
14
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@Potchum @ArcRaidersInfo Because verbal abuse is against the code of conduct we all agreed to when we installed the game. And true enough you don’t kill other writers look at your stats. It says Raiders knocked not killed.
English
2
0
0
42
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@Lycantocles True indeed. We agreed to the code of conduct when we installed the game and started to play. If you can’t honor your agreements, then don’t agree to them and don’t play the game. The picture clearly shows a violation of the code of conduct.
English
0
0
1
13
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@RIDDIMxRats Or you should be adult enough to read the agreements you digitally sign when you click agree. Harassment and hate speech go against the code of conduct. We all agreed to when we installed the game. If you can’t honor your agreement then don’t agree.
English
0
0
0
8
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@ArcRaidersInfo It is absolutely hilarious. No one bothers to read the agreement you click on to play a game. If you can’t follow a code of conduct then don’t agree to. Personally, you can talk to me, however you want. Because I can talk just as bad if not worse. But I clicked the agreement too
English
0
0
1
31
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@wolfthe9lives @ArcRaidersInfo Harassment and hate speech actually go against the embark code of conduct you agree to when you play the game. But most people never read that stuff anyway. They just skip through quickly so they can play. I do understand.
English
0
0
0
21
Gary Vanover
Gary Vanover@Vanover1970·
@wolfthe9lives @ArcRaidersInfo Your trying to use the reductio ad absurdum argument. That doesn’t apply here. Shooting in the game is an actual in game element. Verbal abuse in chat is a real life element. So, yes, verbal obscenity and abuse should be punishable.
English
1
0
1
23