Mark Vendy

@smashbaals No, no! Unless you're a complete failure and disgrace you're a Pharisee and your testimony isn't enough of an attention grift!

The Church needs to celebrate the Testimony of Christians who remained virgins till marriage more

@farmingandJesus "He should honor his father and mother but women can disgrace their future husband and children by being sluts" 🤡

My husband is “high quality” and he chose me , a redeemed sinner.. a really bad one actually. Let me explain what high quality is, Tanner , if this actually was a thing … a man who submits to Christ, honors his father and mother, is kind and patient with others, loves his wife like Christ loves his church, walks in the way of Christ, chooses obedience, and doesn’t sit online to call those who Christ redeemed from a promiscuous past , whores.

@smashbaals Boy A: My dad fucked your mom Boy B: But your dad watches porn and mine doesn't Well all know which boy has the bragging rights. It's absolute bullshit to act like being a slut is remotely equal to fapping.

It’s really that simple

@ostrachan @benshapiro @andrewklavan @michaeljknowles If your mom was a slut then your entire life and dignity is tainted. No child should have to grow up with that reality. Why wasn't Mary the world's foremost whore in order to fully exemplify humility and mercy? You people are monsters for acting like it's not a big deal.

An open letter to @benshapiro, @andrewklavan, and @michaeljknowles: You have publicly wronged a good man, Trevor Sheatz. Each of you is a conservative leader. Many of us respect you for your contributions to public life in different ways. However, you have failed to honor the truth in this instance, and you have brought great shame to a young husband and his wife. You have held them up publicly to severe scorn, and people have sadly followed suit. Here is the truth, men. Ashley Sheatz has shared her conversion testimony for years. As one example, the screenshot below is from an article she wrote in May 2020 for a website I edited (it was called Reformanda and is no longer operating). I refer you to it for clarity. Of her own volition, Ashley shared about her deliverance from promiscuity, the occult, and doing hard drugs. These things wrecked and ruined her life. Again, Ashley was clear as crystal about her sexual sin, and said more about it in the 2020 article she wrote than Trevor did in the X post you tore to shreds on air. She has publicly talked about her deliverance from sexual sin on numerous occasions. (Nor did Trevor call his wife derogatory words--it's really disappointing that you all collectively presented him as doing so.) Ashley does all this--from what I know--not to be salacious or get clicks. (Nor does Trevor.) She does so to warn others about the destructiveness of sin, and even more than this, the redeeming power of the blood of Jesus. Ashley, with her husband Trevor, is a born again believer. I won't speak for her, but as a friend of her and Trevor, I know that she lives to magnify the mercy of God in her life. This letter is not written in fury or pique. I write it in love to each of you men to ask you to correct the record and consider the ungraciousness of your remarks about Trevor Sheatz. You are each a respected public figure; your words get carry a great deal of weight, far more than I have or Trevor has or Ashley has. You have wronged a good man, and you simply do not have your facts right about Ashley Sheatz's willingness to testify publicly to the power of Christ over her sin. You have passed judgment on a sweet young couple without taking the time to back up your pronouncements with research. In sum, you need the same forgiveness we all do. You need the blood of Jesus to cover you. You do not need to be a slightly better person, or a more committed devotee of religion. You need to be born again, to trust Jesus as your Lord and Savior, and to repent of all your sin. You and I are no different; we are great sinners all, but Christ is a great Savior. May God work in your hearts to lead you to this place if he has not. Best, Owen Strachan

@anahnemoo If I followed you around spitting in your face you should just put up with it because I have no diseases and it won't harm anything but your "pride", right? You're dishonest and simply hate accountability. You're the true hypocrites.

I shouldn't be surprised. I really shouldn't. But I'm still surprised; astounded, even. The number of men who claim Christ in their profiles who are openly and unrepentantly downright sexually depraved has truly astounded me over last three days. Make no mistake: they hate Him.

@Pastor_Gabe Would you support life in prison for women who betray and disgrace their future husband and children by being sluts? Probably not. But you probably do for murderers because you're an animal who values the flesh but not honor.

If your response to “God has redeemed this formerly promiscuous woman, and He will redeem you, too” Is something like, “Oh yeah?? So you want our sons to marry prostitutes? Girls can act like wh*res and they’ll just be forgiven for it?” You’re mocking the gospel.

@kaleggey @GooberMcGoblin @5pointNat Almost all modern women are sluts because people like you act like it's no big deal because you're selfish, dishonest and unjust and only care about evading accountability.

@GooberMcGoblin @5pointNat Are you worried these women are going to beat down your door? None of them want to marry you, so you can relax.

Seeing men criticized for marrying women with a past who’ve been redeemed by Christ kind of reminds me of Jonah: angry that God would show mercy to those he thought didn’t deserve it. In the same way, it holds up a mirror to our hearts, revealing how truly we understand and believe the gospel.

@5pointNat Boy A: My dad banged the mom of every kid in class. Boy B: My mom got banged by every kid's dad Boy A has bragging rights. Boy B's essentially been castrated. The problem is that you people are dishonest and won't admit how truly monstrous sluts are.

@shebringsjoy Sluts are far more disgraceful than whores. Sluts defile themselves for fun and for free.

I’m a little confused on the whole “all women who aren’t virgins when they get married are prostitutes” dynamic coming from Christians. A prostitute is someone who sells her body for financial compensation. A woman who is unchaste before marriage is just a pagan. Both are redeemable, but one is very, very different than the other.

@Galatians110Guy @michaela_faith_ Joseph didn't want to publicly shame Mary but these animals are telling everyone "it's fine to publicly shame your children for attention about your testimony"

@michaela_faith_ Anyone criticizing them needs to read the Bible.

Y’all, I’ve followed Trevor and Ashley on Instagram for years. They’ve both been open about this. If you consider yourself a Christian, and you’re mocking her for who she used to be before becoming a believer, you need to get off social media, and get into the Word.

@HakureiRyan @Galatians110Guy @michaela_faith_ Based

@Galatians110Guy @michaela_faith_ Oh yes, I must have missed Whorinthians I'll make sure to reread that book.

@michaela_faith_ "I have completely betrayed and disgraced my husband and children. I was a disgusting animal and there's no excuse. It's completely my fault and now our relationship and family is forever tainted'' - What women would say if they were truly sorry and valued honor but none are/do

@kangminlee Muslims are completely justified in subjugating women.

We not only have a promiscuity problem among women but also a death problem. 70% of women who abort self-identify as Christian. 43% were attending church at least monthly when they killed their child. Yet whenever this sin is called out, blame instantly shifts to men. Every problem in society is apparently men’s fault, and women need to take no accountability. Having standards as a Christian man apparently makes you a misogynist, incel, or porn addict. This is messaging is indistinguishable from feminists. It’s a lose-lose for men. Women constantly blame men for failing to lead, but when men try to right the wrongs of women and correct course for our depraved society, they're lambasted as insecure women-haters. No wonder the red-pill and manosphere are exploding. Effeminate church leaders offer the same feminist script and have zero answers for disillusioned young men.

@ScottRoberts Women should realize that they're completely betraying and disgracing any good man who would love them by letting Chad and Tyrone smash. Why aren't women ever held to standards or responsibilities?

Single men, do you wanna be different? Take her to church, not your bed. Buy her flowers, not shots at a bar. Commit to her, don't use her. Lead her in prayer, not into sin. Be a man, not a boy.

@Ramandu_Star @TrevorSheatz Because sex is a form of violence in essence and women are the inherent losers in the equation, thus Chad is based and sluts are a disgrace.

I'll put something out there: The old testament shows very little interest in the concept of male virginity whatsoever. It's notable that the scripture regarding a woman being put to death if she turns out to not be a virgin at marriage (Deuteronomy 22v13) is entirely gender asymmetric. There is simply no comparable sin leveled at a man. Why could this be? Well, it seems to me, this has at least something to do with understanding of reproductive biology. The Biblical understanding of reproduction is very much to that of a "seed" on "fertile soil". The woman's womb is the soil, the man provides the "seed". There was clearly an understanding that that the typical "planting" time from seed to fruition was around 9 months - that bit of biology was understood. However, it seems likely that is where the understanding comes to and end. It is not clear at all that the people of the old testament understood, for example, that if a woman slept with two men, the pregnancy that came forth would be 100% the genetic offspring of one or other of the men but not both. We are so used to this genetic truth, but remember no one saw a human sperm down a microscope until 1677. If one follows the seed in soil analogy, we know that, although if you plant a seed, you get a crop some months later, it's not quite that simple. You also get weeds. You sometimes get some seed which lies dormant and crops up in the field randomly in a different season. If you plant two seeds, you might get one, or both crops come through. The exact mechanics of all of this were something of a mystery to the ancients - and likewise with reproduction. We have heavily "spiritualised" the whole aspect of virginity, while, to the people of the old testament it was likely a fair more practical concern. The issue here is that *everything* was also expressed in a spiritual way, because there just wasn't any other distinction. This is why the priest was also the local dermatologist. I know of absolutely know Christian who thinks that Leviticus 13 v9-17 are the basis of modern medical dermatological diagnosis of whether a condition is contagious or not. We seem happy to accept that the bizarre description and management laid out here is a reflection of human limitations in understanding dermatology. But, we seem reluctant to accept that the Biblical obsession with virginity is likely, at least partly down to a limitation in their understanding of reproduction. Essentially, there seems to be an idea that the paternity of any child issuing forth from a non-virgin woman is somehow questionable. There is no understanding that a 9 month quarantine period without intercourse would render certainty with regards the paternity question. Rather, there is this idea that, once a woman is not a virgin, all offspring from her womb are tainted by the seed of all the men she has been with - like a field planted with multiple crops might throw up any one of them. Indeed, this ambiguity of paternity is actually exploited to an advantage in the concept of levirate marriage in Deuteronomy 25v5, Here, if a man dies and lives his wife childless, the brother of the dead man is obligated to marry the widow and sleep with her, and the implication is that somehow, by putting his seed into her, he will bring forth the seed of his dead brother - "the first son she bears shall carry on the name". None of this is to say that scripture doesn't have standards which are important regarding sex and marriage. But on the specific obsession over virginity: This seems to arise very much out of what was largely a practical consideration of paternity in biblical times. I'm not convinced it would have ever been a "thing" in quite the same way if DNA tests and a knowledge of genetic inheritance had existed back then, if I'm honest. Else why is the Biblical concern with virginity so blatantly gender asymmetric?

Virginity should not be the #1 factor Christians look for when considering who to marry. Godliness and being attracted to them is. Virginity matters, and it's a blessing from God. It's not wrong to desire someone who is a virgin. And past sexual sin regularly carries present-day consequences. But I fear we've placed virginity on such a high pedestal that it's become an idol for many. The Bible doesn't say that someone "is free to be married to anyone [they want] ​— ​only if they're a virgin." It says that someone "is free to be married to anyone [they want] ​— ​only in the Lord (aka, only if they're a Christian)" (1 Cor. 7:39). In other words, what matters above all else is that your spouse is a believer, virgin or not. Again, while desiring to marry a virgin isn't a bad thing, it becomes a bad thing if it causes you to miss out on marrying the person who truly matters: the man or woman who's born-again, passionate about Jesus, excellent in the God-given characteristics of a godly wife or husband, and physically attractive to you. And a mature Christian should desire those things in a potential spouse above all else, regardless of the past sins the person may have gone through (though they should certainly weigh out that aspect as well in this decision, since it does matter).

@_RO33G_ @TrevorSheatz These sluts and the men who enable them are selfish monsters who essentially psychologically abuse children by making this the reality of their lives

@TrevorSheatz In a world filled with whores in 2026 the biggest flex a man can have is a virgin wife, and his kids deserve it.

@kangminlee @TrevorSheatz All of your takes are so based and perfectly worded. I commend you greatly, sir!

Can Christians please drop the fake-pious sanctimonious "this virtue is now an idol" routine already? In a culture devoid of goodness and beauty, we don't need you to countersignal things of God by calling it "idolatry." In our depraved, degenerate culture, I promise you virginity being an idol is NOT an issue at all.

@Iamkrebkira Nah your greatest fear is a society where men hold you accountable for your actions instead of simping.

Men literally think a woman’s greatest fear is loneliness. You’re 100% wrong, her greatest fear is getting married, becoming a domestic servant, living a boring and miserable life with a worthless husband, and realizing she wasted her time with you.

@Johnnyappl77151 Don't complain unless you genuinely support doing things very Muslim style. It's the only way.

All you have to do to enrage women is say being a whore is gross. For some reason a lot of them take that very personally.

@isa2001m In all cases at all ages you're the ones who get fucked. You're the inherent losers in the equation who get invaded and conquered. So it's always disgraceful on your end unless it's with your husband.

A lot of “ex-slut” stuff just comes down to normal aging. Most people (both men and women) have higher libidos at 16 than they do at 26. Men will probably be a bit annoyed to hear this but it makes total biological sense that it’s easier to settle in your late 20s than in your late teens. And many men would also admit that at 16 they were down to fuck anything and in their late 20s that desire has waned somewhat. Very upsetting for some people that this is normal part of being human being