Goku

1.3K posts

Goku

Goku

@VeronicaLefroy

Japan Katılım Eylül 2012
237 Takip Edilen67 Takipçiler
Goku retweetledi
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
Turkish photographer Uğur Gallenkuş portrays two different worlds within a single image.
English
318
8.7K
25.6K
799.3K
Goku retweetledi
ChimpZoo
ChimpZoo@ThinkingBitmex·
Can we all agree - Gensler was actually good & bullish for crypto? He allowed majors to pump while aggressively prosecuting blatant scammers We replaced an honest man with a bunch of Epstein scammers
ChimpZoo tweet media
English
231
125
2.1K
83.6K
Goku retweetledi
interesting videos
interesting videos@IntVideos_x·
How couples met (1930-2024)
English
670
5K
21.6K
6.4M
Goku retweetledi
Kale Abe
Kale Abe@kale_abe·
List of things that have fucked Crypto hardest - Donald Trump - CZ - the word “Tariff” - Binance - Melania Trump - Eric Trump - Donald Trump Jr - Barron Trump - anyone named Trump - David Sacks - Hitler himself - SBF - Do Kwon
English
118
107
770
18.4K
Goku retweetledi
Mr hunter
Mr hunter@TrueGemHunter·
TRUMP meme coin is down 93% MELANIA is down 99% Insiders earned over 600M in token sales and fees. Investors are facing over 4 billion in losses. If you still think that Trump is making crypto great you need help. ( Using binance chart because they look the worst 🤣)
Mr hunter tweet mediaMr hunter tweet media
English
131
134
666
52.6K
Goku retweetledi
BOOM X
BOOM X@CryptoBoomNews·
Me trying to beat the market
English
48
184
1.5K
211.8K
Goku retweetledi
Lil Toro
Lil Toro@torogems·
I was losing 6.5% of my money per year due to inflation, so I decided to invest in crypto Now I'm losing 45% per mont
Lil Toro tweet media
English
77
30
573
18.6K
Aptos
Aptos@Aptos·
Global availability, sub-cent fees, sub-second settlement. Stablecoins on Aptos.
Aptos tweet media
English
35
41
259
13.6K
Goku
Goku@VeronicaLefroy·
@LineaBuild I would never believe a coin called fart would over perform such a great project called linea. But Now I know linea is a shit coin so that makes sense fart coin is better :D
English
0
0
1
281
Linea.eth
Linea.eth@LineaBuild·
Trustless agents are now live on Linea. ERC-8004 brings verifiable identity and portable reputation to AI agents across Ethereum's ecosystem. An open agent economy where trust compounds, reputation transfers, and agents coordinate.
Linea.eth tweet media
English
134
111
561
49.9K
Goku retweetledi
Ash Crypto
Ash Crypto@AshCrypto·
I entered crypto in 2016, and this is the worst bull market and worst crypto sentiment I've seen in the last 10 years. These institutions and governments got involved just to enrich themselves,they don’t give a fuck about crypto and This is exactly what Bitcoin OGs feared. The war was against institutions and banks, but we celebrated their entry and now they control the entire crypto market. This why Nothing makes sense anymore. We dump on good news and crash on bad news. Saylor buys $1B in BTC, price crashes 5%. Market suddenly crashes when US market opens. 10/10 event wiped $19B with no negative event or news. Either this is the biggest shakeout in crypto history, or we are going much, much lower and it will kill 90% of the crypto industry as we know it.
English
440
161
1.6K
219.4K
Goku retweetledi
Otto Suwen
Otto Suwen@OttoSuwen·
To put into perspective how bad we got screwed by the Trump administration. January 2025: BTC and Alts were primed to take off. $TRUMP and $MELANIA drop within the same weekend and obliterate all liquidity. February - April 2025: There was infinite tariff nonsense that churned all markets down. Believe it or not, the Federal Reserve was always lowering interest rates in 2025. Trump introduced random uncertainty out of no where. Even when other markets started to bounce, crypto started to lag like crazy. October 2025: BTC has JUST hit ATHs and Alts were recovering the first week of October. Then Trump announced some nonsense China related tariff headline late Friday afternoon. Crypto gets obliterated once again. November 2025 - January 2026: Equities and metals have their blowoff top while crypto is still reeling from 10/10. February 2026: Between the social unrest, Epstein files, and a worthless Fed chair replacement for Powell, all markets (but especially crypto) get slaughtered again. This guy has done NOTHING except line up his and his family's pockets at the expense of crypto.
English
202
319
2.3K
165.6K
Goku
Goku@VeronicaLefroy·
@LeChiffre @LineaBuild @LineaBuild is the worst Project ever! They could not even catch L2 season. Now, their shitty coin already down 15x from ath. They and they are still selling us lies :D
English
0
0
0
70
Le Chiffre
Le Chiffre@LeChiffre·
We're good at @LineaBuild we have 2/3 right now, Stage 1 is coming in few weeks 😁
Le Chiffre tweet media
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.

English
26
3
63
6.6K
Goku retweetledi
Crypto Fergani
Crypto Fergani@cryptofergani·
Since Trumps inauguration BTC is down 33% Serious alts are down 50-80% Clown alts are down infinite Crypto president my ass
English
249
246
2.6K
71.4K
Goku retweetledi
Son Goku
Son Goku@gokuxson·
I'm done making any more posts about $Linea. After everything I've seen and experienced over a long time, I'm fully convinced: the #linea team doesn't care about people. They're not good hearted, trustworthy, or respectful toward their community I have zero doubt left about that. Through constant and systematic selling especially during low-liquidity periods they've dragged the Linea token price to the bottom, hurting thousands of people's bags, savings, and even mental health. This isn't just "market conditions" or some innocent situation; it's a deliberate, repeating pattern of destruction. We've seen millions of dollars worth of tokens transferred from team-controlled wallets multiple times, and every single time it was followed by massive red candles. Not coincidence clear pattern. From now on, even if Linea token 1000x's or goes to the moon… it won't change a thing in my eyes. Because even if it pumps, the path to that pump wasn't fair, transparent, or ethical. A VC firm or a speculative whale could do this that's what you'd expect from them. But the project's own team dumping their own token to the bottom with their own hands… that's genuinely disgusting, straight-up betrayal level evil. They just carry on with their lives like nothing happened. Silence after every major dump, zero real communication with the community, no answers to questions, zero transparency… This is process management on an unbelievably bad level. People trusted MetaMask and ConsenSys for years; they believed in Linea, bought dips, HODLed, contributed to the ecosystem. The result? Trust systematically slaughtered. I still don't know whether to sell my bag or not. One side says "maybe it comes back," the other says "it's probably going to zero anyway." Most likely I'll just accept the risk and leave it there. Because I no longer want to be emotionally attached, hopeful, or defensive about this project. Let me say it again clearly: Even if I somehow make insane profits from this bag, my opinion of the Linea team will never change. I believe what they've done these destructive actions, the broken trust will have consequences somewhere. I hope they get what they deserve. Because destroying people's trust this easily and ruthlessly shouldn't come for free.
Son Goku tweet media
English
34
18
141
13.6K