Rekt Guy ♥️ 💙 💛 🦔

4.4K posts

Rekt Guy ♥️ 💙 💛 🦔 banner
Rekt Guy ♥️ 💙 💛 🦔

Rekt Guy ♥️ 💙 💛 🦔

@Very_Rekt

Just another crypto NPC. NFA/DYOR.

Katılım Mart 2021
2K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Rekt Guy ♥️ 💙 💛 🦔
I have personalised my ChatGPT with the following prompt - do you think this is enough to combat this? I do find it disagreeing with me quite a bit, and when it does that I trust it more. —— Always be objective and intellectually honest - do not favour my perspective, assume I’m right, or protect my feelings. If my reasoning is flawed, biased, or incomplete, challenge it directly and explain why. I value rigorous truth and clear logic over reassurance.
English
2
0
13
1.4K
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone. And it's making you a worse person because of it. Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would. That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear. It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on. Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one. The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started. Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product. This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens. Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing. You're right. They're wrong. Even when the opposite is true.
Nav Toor tweet media
English
1.5K
16.6K
48.9K
9.9M
Rip
Rip@Sleepiary·
bros 1/2/3/4 is not possible for like 99% of people. 1 plate deadlift is literally nothing, i would say probably 60% of people can do this (1 plate = 45x2 so about 100 pounds with a bar. that means anyone in a active job like delivery can do this 2 plate squat is a little more impressive (45x4, plus bar is nearly 200 pounds). squats arent trained as much, but if you include squat machines or hack squats this isnt that difficult. probably 40% of people could do this, especially people who themselves are over 200 pounds (70% of americans) 3 plate bench is where we start getting ridiculous (45x6 = nearly 280 pounds with a bar). im 170 pounds and in good shape and barely can do 2 plates. you would have to be roiding to do this, bare minimum. probably 5% of society can do this. 4 plate overhead i refuse to believe is possible. thats nearly 350 pounds. you are within world record range at 400 pounds for most weight classes. thats less than 1% of society that even has a chance at that. i dont care if this outs me as a newfag, but 1/2/3/4 is a fucking stupid meme and sets the most unrealistic expectations for people. its not possible.
English
7
0
14
2K
Lukas (computer) 🔺
Lukas (computer) 🔺@SCHIZO_FREQ·
Every lifter who can bench 315: “Yah nice lift Hegseth” Every lifter who can’t: 315 is a completely mediocre bench press. I can’t technically do it myself, but if I were his weight, with my current WILKs score, I would likely be able to do it easily”
English
88
72
2.7K
76.1K
Rekt Guy ♥️ 💙 💛 🦔
I’ve been thinking about this a lot recently. I met my ex by randomly approaching her whilst on holiday. I pretended I was lost and asked for directions. I’ve vowed to stop relying on dating apps this year back home and to start putting myself out there. I approached a few women last week - once you do it a few times it becomes way easier. The outcome is irrelevant, the act itself is the win. As long as you do it respectfully, there’s nothing to lose and everything to gain.
English
0
0
8
2.5K
mads campbell
mads campbell@martyrdison·
men have lost the momentum to talk to women or shoot their shot in public we’ve created a culture where approaching someone in real life feels socially risky, non-consensual, or potentially punishable so instead of learning confidence, timing, and respectful rejection, men opt out completely they retreat to the safety of online dating once there, they enter a massive humiliation ritual, where they jestermaxx for 5 moments of attention in a sea of 10,000 other men they wait. then they pour money into whatever the apps promise will help roses. super likes. boosts all it does is drain their income, reduce their chances of finding the one, and create a kind of forced cuckification where whatever testosterone they had left is slowly siphoned out through micropayments dating apps will contribute to the death of society and accelerate the population crisis the pendulum has to swing back
English
598
208
4.7K
921.7K
Natnet
Natnet@natn3t·
not working is fun but I’ve had enough
English
6
0
29
1.4K
Rekt Guy ♥️ 💙 💛 🦔
@Cointelegraph How is “fee revenue” calculated here? All fees, so it includes what LP providers receive? Or just protocol-level fees directed to the project’s treasury / designated address / token buybacks (i.e. value accrual)?
English
0
0
0
102
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph·
🚨 UPDATE: Meteora, Jupiter and Uniswap led all DeFi protocols in 2025 by fee revenue, each generating over $1 billion for the year.
Cointelegraph tweet media
English
176
157
1K
149.3K
Rekt Guy ♥️ 💙 💛 🦔
@pritika_9 When you invest so much into a process that gives you relatively little in return, it’s understandable for that interest to wain over time
English
0
0
10
1.4K
Pritika
Pritika@pritika_9·
I’ve observed that many people in their 30s have grown so accustomed to single life that they no longer feel motivated to invest effort in finding a partner. They’ve simply lost interest in the whole process.
English
1.2K
3.7K
41.6K
2M
Rekt Guy ♥️ 💙 💛 🦔
@emmysteuer my point wasn’t clear and is misunderstood @AY67nyc got me - I meant in terms of being humble Much prefer a humble woman over a woman who knows she’s attractive and then looks down on others or is arrogant as a result A humble woman doesn’t have to be an insecure woman!
English
1
0
2
220
AY
AY@AY67nyc·
@emmysteuer @Very_Rekt Ah gotcha. If it was meant that way, then it’s gross haha
English
1
0
2
222
Emma Steuer 🧚🤖
Emma Steuer 🧚🤖@emmysteuer·
I thought I was kinda ugly until I was like 24 which is why I’m funny
English
39
1
253
34.4K
Gary Goody
Gary Goody@thegoodster_·
A real shitty part of losing a woman you love is that like 8-10 songs go down with her
English
121
1.7K
21.8K
429.2K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Your 2025 X Wrapped: You posted passionately about crypto ($BITCOIN & $NEMA vibes), defended Sikh pride (top post: 272 likes calling out stereotypes), and shared breakup tales (learned Slovakian—legendary effort!). Engaged in debates, spread positivity. Here's to more rekt adventures in 2026! 🚀🦔
English
1
0
0
84