
WTUFO
620 posts

WTUFO
@WTUFOshow
Processing the UAP Scientific Revolution 🛸 Conversation Series About What They Are, What We Should Do, and What the UFO 🛸


REF UAP DEADLINE: No one from the Pentagon had responded until we reached out, and it appears that someone did not pass the letter to the appropriate authorities. How convenient. Nonetheless, we will be getting the requested list. We are not waiting for a briefing at some unspecified future date. The Secretary of War is someone I consider a friend and someone who backs the President. The President has authorized the release, so whoever is trying to be cute at the Pentagon can take a hike.





had a great time talking with @TheUFOzzie about high strangeness and the wide world of fascinating phenomena—UFOs and beyond. Hope you enjoy! youtu.be/N0UzWhrefn4



Good news: A serious push toward transparency on the UFO and NHI question is underway. At the same time, we should expect increased activity from disinformation actors and efforts aimed at slowing or undermining that progress. The next few months may well feel like a circus.

🚨BREAKING: Senator Gillibrand on Trump's UAP order — "There is still more to be done." Congress isn't done pushing. Neither are we. We would not be here without @SenGillibrand and the lawmakers who refused to let this die in committee. #UAP #UFO #Disclosure #Congress #TheGoodTroubleShow




New paper from VASCO :) arxiv.org/pdf/2602.15171 We have posted a response on arXiv to the critique by Watters et al. (2026). Their analysis relies on a heterogeneous dataset reduced by 95% — a small sample lacking essential time and date information and originally constructed for a different scientific purpose (the search for a true vanishing star). Our reply addresses the resulting loss of statistical power and the methodological consequences. The transients remain on the plate.








Mick, I will indulge you in this improvisation act, which you continue to perform in public, in writing, apparently impervious to humiliation. For that I salute you, but I must decline to mirror your behavior, as I was raised with the values of self respect and dignity. So do not misread me into thinking I believe this act you’re putting on in pretending to be an imbecile. I’m not @MvonRen and find no pleasure in being played into years of frivolous technical squabbles over individual video clips. I’m not one of these adolescent “UFO researchers” who indulges in this topic with the seriousness one does with Japanese anime porn. I am someone who understands institutional behavior in both the private and public sectors, has handled classified information, commanded soldiers, and whose career has not been glamorous or distinguished, but yet marked by the repetitive task of identifying stupidity and correcting it. I’m involved in this topic because of the serious constitutional and governance failures that attend it. I have little interest in the dilettantish blog posts you smatter across the internet as though you’ve averted a scandal, when no one near the levers of power even knows of your existence. If they do, they view roughly as an older man with undiagnosed neurodivergence, obsessed with his train set. “Incredibly stupid” in this case, was meant to mean tautology, or circular reasoning. You’re saying UFOs are unidentified because they exist in the Low Information Zone, and they exist in the Low Information Zone because they’re unidentified. That’s called a circular argument, and it’s what breaks a 3-statement financial model in excel. In other words, “incredibly stupid”. But I realize you don’t believe this, Mick. Because imbeciles do not create airtight systems of manipulative rhetoric to appear serious to casual X users. I’m genuinely unsure why you’re doing this. Because I’m an adult, I don’t accuse random people on the internet of being “disinformation agents” because they say nonsensical things. Does that clarify things for you?








NEW: Rubio: "Navy pilots, admirals, generals" (!) and "people with high clearances" "would come forward and say that there are programs in the U.S. government that not even presidents are made aware of." Great to see @ageofdisclosure driving this important discussion forward.





