Wandregisel 🇭🇺

I got quote tweeted by the ex-world champion. I'm a big deal like that Front row seating to the worst geopolitical analysis known to man. Same old bland "gas station with nukes" tripe

@cirnosad Night time for me, I go sleep. have a great day! 💙

Good morning oomfies! Iran must make it clear that if Trump makes good on his 'promise' to attack its largest power plant it will endlessly destroy every single power plant in the middle east. This will be equivalent to destroying all the oil infrastructure & desalination plants.

@MeltingSnowBro Which kind of gets to my point. Every appeal to morality by the pro-war crowd fails because they are completely morally inconsistent, and really what they mean is that the US does it because it can. At least your perspective is honest Good night!

@Wandregisel98 Who is arguing strikes from Hamas and Hezbollah are without justification? Obviously they have justification. You are always justified in attacking your enemies.

If having the capability to attack justifies a war, then every country on earth can justifiably attack the US

@MeltingSnowBro No, but a track record of attacking countries, which tbh is a more justifiable pretext. Let's turn that reason elsewhere. Our great ally Israel quite publicly hints at its greater Israel project. By that same reasoning, they are a legitimate target for preemptive strikes

@Wandregisel98 Does America have "death to every country on earth" slogan?

@xvii_507 :(

@Wandregisel98 king of letdowns btw

In terms of twitter followers, this oomf!

@Baku88475562 What are you talking about, Budapest has a statue of Columbo

We can't have bronze statues of anime characters here in the West. Instead we get ugly creatures that stand for nothing.

I am seeing a lot of commentary from pro-war commentators claiming that Iran's effective retaliation against Israel, as well as its 4,000 km range missiles, "proves" that Iran was an "imminent threat." This is, of course, nonsense since Iran didn't strike until it was first attacked. But it shows the extent to which these pro-war commentators have adopted Israel's military logic to construct these arguments. A threat is normally defined as "capacity + intent." Just having the capacity to strike at you is not sufficient to qualify as a threat; there must also be hostile intent. Otherwise, the US would have to go around the world and destroy all military capabilities in other countries since those capabilities would constitute a threat in and of themselves. It's an absurd and unsustainable approach to security. But that is exactly how Israel defines threats. As legendary Israeli air force general David Ivry explained to me, Israel takes intent out of the equation since it presumes that all regional states ultimately will seek its destruction if they ever have the capacity to do so. Thus, Israel has to ensure that no country - or combination of countries - has the military and political capability to challenge Israel. When they do, those capabilities have to be eliminated. (This is Israel's goal in its war with Iran.) As a result, Israel achieves security not by balancing or managing threats, but by dominating all its neighbors. Achieving Israel's dominion is incidentally enshrined in US law, in which the US has to ensure Israel's "strategic military edge." It is this logic that these pro-war commentators are now using when they claim that Iran's surprising military performance "proves" that it was an imminent threat. Not only have many of these commentators adopted Israel's goals and justifications for this war, but also its profoundly flawed security logic.

@BriggsJosh97688 I hate when I have to do that

@Wandregisel98 I've heard my neighbor practicing with a high caliber firearm, i am definitely within range , so i'm gonna have to take him out unfortunately

#海老塚智生誕祭2026 #海老塚智生誕祭

描いた。 ＃海老塚智生誕祭2026 #ガルクラ

#海老塚智生誕祭2026 #海老塚智生誕祭

@tizkeru When's the last time Israel committed genocide? Answer: they're doing it right now You guys fight for Satan. Enjoy your just desserts in hell

@Wandregisel98 When was the last time an American president led a "Death to X" chant?

@loviedotsol @ThomBrady5 You guys serve Satan. Enjoy your just desserts in hell

@Wandregisel98 @ThomBrady5 Cope lmao

@loviedotsol @MalleusJudas @ThomBrady5 Want to compare who's got a whiter country? You're like 53% white lol

@Wandregisel98 @MalleusJudas @ThomBrady5 This doesn’t work on anyone brownoid

@WytPilledCurze For you guys, it's just what Israel tells you what to do

@Wandregisel98 They're welcome to try and find out if 'international law' or naked force actually dictates justification

@2terrific4you You got me there, I do reserve some skepticism on that lol

@Wandregisel98 He was mine, too, at one point. He couldn't handle that I knew more on explosives than him when he tried to shizopost about alleged nuclear weapons being used on Russia.

@2terrific4you But he's my oomfie 🥺

@Wandregisel98 Beware. He is a shizoid with a fragile ego.

@MalleusJudas @ThomBrady5 Ok? Why do you support Jews who hate Christ?

@Wandregisel98 @ThomBrady5 Lmao. Bleating from some irrelevant bloc is def a choice.

@airdog19 @FischerKing64 Yeah, basically his destiny at that point. A match between the two still would have been cool

@Wandregisel98 @FischerKing64 Korchnoi was a stud. But nobody was gonna beat Bobby back then. Except Bobby ...

Bobby Fischer was able to defeat the Soviet school of chess by copying it, and then subverting it through a long term plan. He learned from reading their magazines, studying their games. In the 1960s learning certain openings and structures inside and out was the way to victory. This is something Botvinnik was teaching all the Soviet masters. And they passed this training on. Fischer picked it up in their literature. He didn’t have a Soviet teacher - which is another reason to admire his achievement. Beyond opening analysis - the USSR masters would focus on consistent endgame play. Fischer became proficient in winning endgames where he had a bishop and his opponent had a knight - he studied this endlessly and became unbeatable in such situations. And he mastered rook endings - which every GM must do. But his masterstroke to the World Championship was hiding his ideas until 1972. Fischer was so good that he beat everyone to become the challenger to Boris Spassky. But in doing so he played the openings everyone expected him to play. What he had been playing for a decade. The Soviets knew what he would do, prepared for it - but Fischer beat them anyway. Then he shifted course. When he played Spassky for the actual World Championship in Iceland, he unleashed new ideas in the Benoni, the Alekhine, the Queen’s Gambit. These were openings he mostly avoided his entire career. He had planned this stuff for years. For one moment in 1972. And he delivered. It’s an extraordinary achievement. It was a feat of great planning. And Fischer was the GOAT because he put far more distance between himself and every other player than anyone else - including Kasparov and Carlsen - has ever achieved.

@Kineticnewsfeed @RadarHits @grok You think changing the AI changes anything lmao

@Wandregisel98 @RadarHits @grok What source do you want? ChatGTP you stupid bitch

🚨 BREAKING Israel requests emergency session at UN Security Council, accusing Iran of using banned cluster munitions. Israel routinely uses both cluster bombs and white phosphorous on Palestinians.