WayneJ

6K posts

WayneJ banner
WayneJ

WayneJ

@WayneJoubert8

Husband, father, follower of Christ. Born for this hour and you were, too. I believe that in Him we live and move and have our being.

Michigan Katılım Şubat 2024
1.1K Takip Edilen2.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
My mother holds a world record for the most multiple births in the shortest period. In less than six years, she had 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐬 — nine babies before most families have their second child. She went on to raise 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧 in total. Last summer, at 101 years old, she decided it was time to share her full story. I was honored to co-author her memoir with her: 𝐉𝐨𝐲 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐉𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲: 𝐌𝐲 𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝐘𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐋𝐢𝐟𝐞, 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐠𝐞, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐑𝐚𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧. It’s an honest, heartfelt, and surprisingly quick read about resilience, love, and finding joy through every season of life — no matter how chaotic. The early reviews have been wonderful. If you have Kindle Unlimited, it’s available to read for free right now. It’s also available in soft and hardcover on Amazon here: amazon.com/dp/B0GQQB2GWB
English
0
0
4
194
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
@atensnut He looks like the guy from the Mod Squad to me.
English
2
0
3
530
Juanita Broaddrick
Juanita Broaddrick@atensnut·
This is a photo with an article on FB. It says it’s Farrah Faucet and Lee Majors from the 1970’s. It is Farrah but that is NOT Lee Majors. Don’t know who it is.
Juanita Broaddrick tweet media
English
1.5K
64
1.6K
433.7K
🌷 LIZZIE🌷
🌷 LIZZIE🌷@farmingandJesus·
If I hear “we gave you your Bible” one more time ….. You gave no one a Bible. You kept it from people and choked/burned them at the stake for translating it. The books had already been compiled and decided on well before yall got your canonization bragging rights.
🌷 LIZZIE🌷 tweet media
English
285
130
1.3K
38.9K
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
Depends. I love my Catholic brothers and sisters who have trusted in Christ and his finished work at the cross for their salvation. On the other hand, my patience is tested when I read Catholic defenders promoting clearly refuted claims, such as the 50,000 denominations supposedly caused by Sola Scriptura. You could respond with a list 20 articles and references from credible Catholics and Protestants alike that expose this lie, but every day, I'll still see some angry Catholics trying to throw that in the face of the "prots".
English
0
0
0
12
Nathan
Nathan@nathancoxey·
When we discuss our faith with others who disagree, is it better to be highly confrontational and combative or conciliatory?
English
40
2
9
2.5K
Pastor Rick Brennan
Pastor Rick Brennan@rickbrennanjr·
On my X feed today I read this claim: “For 2,000 years, the Catholic Church has never changed doctrine, edited doctrine, or ‘corrected’ revealed truth to fit the times. That consistency is not human achievement. It is the work of the Holy Spirit guiding the Church in matters of faith and doctrine.” This is essentially what I was taught when I was catechized as a Roman Catholic in the 1950s and 1960s. But history shows that this claim is demonstrably false. First, many doctrines now required by Rome were not taught with anything like their later dogmatic precision in the early undivided Church. For example, Transubstantiation was not dogmatically defined until Lateran IV in 1215. The Immaculate Conception was not defined until 1854. Papal infallibility was not defined until 1870. The bodily Assumption of Mary was not defined until 1950. Second, Rome’s current posture toward Protestants is plainly different from the condemnatory language of Trent. Vatican II did not erase Trent’s anathemas, but it did reframe Protestants as “separated brethren” in a way that would have sounded strange in the sixteenth century. That clearly was a result of doctrinal change made to “fit the time.” That is exactly the point made by “trad” Catholics and the SSPX. Third, the historical record is far more complex than the simple claim that Rome has always taught the same thing in the same way. Rome’s answer is to call this “development of doctrine.” But that only proves the point: doctrine has developed, shifted, hardened, and been rearticulated over time. The real question is whether those later developments are faithful clarifications of apostolic teaching or later accretions imposed by ecclesial authority. As a Protestant, I believe many of them are not catholic in the ancient sense, but Roman innovations that placed later tradition over the clear teaching of Scripture.
Pastor Rick Brennan tweet media
Ojike Uzoma@Xtopher_Uzo

All my life as a Catholic, I will keep thanking God and praying for the Church. One thing you learn as a Catholic is this: the Church cannot change doctrine because of your feelings, opinions, or modern trends. The Church is bigger than that because the truth is bigger than us. If something does not sound clear to you, the Church will explain why it teaches it. If you are still not satisfied, the Church will go even deeper and give you more reasons grounded in Scripture, Tradition, history, and theology. And if you still choose to walk away, the Church will pray for you and leave you to God and your conscience. That is why many people leave the Church confidently, only to return later after discovering the truth outside. For 2,000 years, the Catholic Church has never changed doctrine, edited doctrine, or "corrected" revealed truth to fit the times. That consistency is not human achievement. It is the work of the Holy Spirit guiding the Church in matters of faith and doctrine. That is why Catholics believe in the indefectibility of the Church and the infallibility of the Pope when defining dogma ex cathedra. Christ did not leave us confusion. He left us a Church. Be Catholic and be proud of it. God bless us and God bless the Catholic Church.

English
30
15
88
4.5K
SMA
SMA@smajmj95·
@WayneJoubert8 @rickbrennanjr @gonefishin1948 @WesleyLHuff Funny, I’m a former protester and I know hundreds of ppl who don’t go to church bc THEY r the church. They could never find a preacher THEY agreed with, I was being nice…it’s over 100’s of thousands.
English
1
0
0
16
Pastor Rick Brennan
Pastor Rick Brennan@rickbrennanjr·
In the video released yesterday by @WesleyLHuff entitled, “Why I’m Not Catholic,” he says: “Being a biblically based faithful Christian will make you a bad Roman Catholic and vice versa. There will come a time for the mature believer to have to leave Rome as they realize the incongruity within its doctrines and dogmas with that of the true faith of biblical Christianity.” Wes and I both love Roman Catholics and respect much of what the Church of Rome has done historically to safeguard Scripture, defend orthodox Christology, and spread the gospel. However, I remain Protestant by conviction. In my judgment is that Rome’s doctrinal and sacramental system obscures key teachings of Scripture, especially the sufficiency of Christ, the final authority of Scripture, and justification by faith apart from works of the law. Here is a link to his 40-minute video. It’s well worth the time to listen. youtu.be/DpNgxsiNoOA?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
37
12
82
5.7K
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
@OpStCyprian Part of our nature, according to that same chapter, is that, in the face of natural revelation, humans suppress the truth. That word implies actively holding something down or restraining it, like keeping a lid on it or preventing it from rising/surfacing.
English
0
0
2
115
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
Although I have watched many debates between "Protestants" and Roman Catholics over the past 30 years, it was only recently I learned (with my jaw open while watching a debate) that the Catholic Church has provided infallible interpretation of something like only seven verses of Scripture. And yet, we're the ones who can't interpret Scripture? Sincere Catholic apologists need to provide a reasonable response if this is true. Did I not hear that statement correctly?
English
1
0
2
252
Tim Kauffman
Tim Kauffman@whpub·
In Roman Catholicism, you can use your fallible private interpretation to argue for why an ecumenical council was not ecumenical, why a formal excommunication was not valid, why an official canonization was not legitimate, why a papal statement was not really ex cathedra, why an unpublished papal decree can supersede a published papal statement or council, why a regional provincial council counts as ecumenical, why an apparition of Mary can add to the deposit of faith and help us understand apostolic tradition, why an infallible statement can be immoral but still infallibly true, why an ancient tradition is invalid while a late breaking tradition is apostolic, and why losing track of an oral apostolic tradition is proof of apostolicity. All while claiming to submit unreservedly to the magisterium.🤣😂
Dr Taylor Marshall™️@TaylorRMarshall

@DVerit38142 In my book Infiltration I give the argument for how and why the excommunication was not valid.

English
36
46
278
23.7K
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
I agree with opposing the veneration of body parts of the saints, but asking for a Scriptural reference "anywhere" might open you to someone coming back with the story of Joseph and the apparent reverence they had for his "bones". The Oath: Before his death in Egypt, Joseph told his family, "God will surely come to your aid, and then you must carry my bones up from this place". Genesis 50:25. The Exodus: When the Israelites fled Egypt hundreds of years later, Moses honored this oath and carried Joseph's coffin with them: Exodus 13:19. The Final Burial: Once the Israelites entered the Promised Land, they buried Joseph's bones in Shechem, on a plot of land Jacob had previously purchased. Joshua 24:32.
English
1
0
2
37
Nathan
Nathan@nathancoxey·
I see a lot of hurt feelings, opinions, and misrepresentations of Scripture in the comments but nobody has shown me a precedence set anywhere in the text for collecting and venerating bones, skulls, tongues, hair or any other body parts of any human.
Nathan@nathancoxey

In the entire Bible, there is zero example of God's people collecting, preserving, displaying, or venerating bones, skulls, tongues, hair, or body parts of dead prophets, apostles, or saints as an ongoing devotional practice. There's no model for relic collection or veneration.

English
29
0
25
2.5K
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
In my early days after the Lord gave me a heart of flesh, I had some temptation to revert to some of my old RC ways, specifically continuing to pray St. Anthony whenever I lost something. It seemed to work so well when I was growing up. I guess you could say, I was like the guy in the old joke who goes to the Dr. and says, "Doctor, Doctor! You've got to help my brother. He thinks he's a chicken!" The doctor replies,"How long has he been this way?" The man replies, "About six months." The Dr. replies, "Six months? Why did it take you so long to come to me?" The man replies, "Well, we kinda needed the eggs."
English
0
0
2
63
AMASEEDSOWER
AMASEEDSOWER@DrShayPhD·
Honestly, this is sad, but funny too.
AMASEEDSOWER tweet media
English
26
5
35
1.2K
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
@megievalist It may be merely to give it historical reference, not assign guilt.
English
0
0
0
216
Joe Rogan Podcast News
Joe Rogan Podcast News@joeroganhq·
Hillary Clinton: "If social media doesn’t moderate content, then we lose total control."
English
2.4K
1.1K
3.2K
154.9K
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
Posting tip: Any Protestant that sees the 40,000 or 50,000 denominations point made, immediately recognizes that they are dealing with a lightweight Catholic apologist. Even Trent Horn (from Catholic Answers) has made videos asking Catholics to stop using this grossly exaggerated claim.
English
1
0
0
16
SMA
SMA@smajmj95·
@rickbrennanjr @gonefishin1948 @WesleyLHuff But without the Catholic Church, there is no Bible. You think over 40,000 denominations Protestants have can agree on what goes into the Bible? They can’t believe the same thing, they can’t w the church across the street or when a new pastor goes to a new church.
English
1
0
9
60
Pastor Rick Brennan
Pastor Rick Brennan@rickbrennanjr·
@gonefishin1948 @WesleyLHuff Protestants base their faith in Jesus Christ—as he revealed himself to the Apostles: recorded in the same New Testament that you use. So, you can get off that priestly high horse and characterize Protestant theology correctly or we can revert to discussing popery.
English
9
0
7
291
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
@HoldenCCole Click bait. One of about 20 common theological "n" words/statements Roman Catholics make to get a reaction.
English
0
1
1
30
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
@KeenanPeachy Not live. Saw the vaccine dance in my news feed 100 times, though.
English
0
0
0
7
LadyValor
LadyValor@lady_valor_07·
How would you describe JK Rowling in one word?
LadyValor tweet media
English
8.3K
235
3.4K
253.1K
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
@JoshuaBarzon As long as I wouldn't have to awkwardly kiss a gay guy to prove how progressive I was... You could also sell, "World's Greatest Boss" mugs.
English
0
0
0
33
Josh Barzon
Josh Barzon@JoshuaBarzon·
My wife and I had a crazy business idea. A restaurant franchise called “The Office,” themed after…. the TV show "The Office." Here’s how we would make it happen: • The space would be styled like Dunder Mifflin. You would check in at Pam’s reception desk. • TVs throughout the restaurant would loop episodes of The Office all day. • The staff would be dressed like office workers. • Even the napkins would be printer paper. • All of the tables would be designed like large rectangular office desks, paired with comfortable leather office chairs. • Coffee would be served in World’s Best Boss mugs. • The walls would be covered in quotes from The Office. • Once a week we would host a half-price appetizer trivia night called Dundies Night, with questions entirely based on the show. The menu would include: • Kevin’s Famous Chili • Pretzel Day appetizer • Dwight’s Beet Salad • Michael’s Fettuccine Alfredo • Pizza by Alfredo’s I am half joking, but also not at all. Be honest. Would you come dine at “The Office” if we started this restaurant?
Josh Barzon tweet media
English
39
2
66
6.4K
WayneJ
WayneJ@WayneJoubert8·
@megbasham She was singing the first one for you, but on the second one I'm sure she wouldn't want you to think that song was about you.
English
0
0
1
63
Megan Basham
Megan Basham@megbasham·
Okay well now she's singing You're So Vain, so I'm not sure what to read into that one!
English
15
0
111
3.8K
Megan Basham
Megan Basham@megbasham·
Man, there is nothing better as a mom than hearing your daughter blow drying her hair while singing, "Prone to wander, Lord, I feel it, prone to leave the God I love. Here's my heart, take and seal it, seal it for thy courts above..." 😭🥹
English
84
80
3.1K
25K
Alyssa Cordova
Alyssa Cordova@lysscordova·
Long overdue personal announcement: last month I joined @JeremyDBoreing full time as Executive Producer of The Jeremy Boreing Show! I started working for Jeremy at DW in 2021 and immediately knew he had a different vision, message, and strategy for the movement and the country than I had ever seen from the right. He took big risks and put more wins on the board than I had ever thought possible. I’m so honored to be part of this next adventure. I still believe the future of the country and the Movement is bright, but only if we all step up and make it so. I’m already so proud of this show and how much it’s inspiring people, and we’re only just getting started. There’s a lot hard work ahead of us, but as we say often around here: the future belongs to those who build it, and I hope you’ll join us in that endeavor.
English
83
25
883
209.4K