WinningSystem

Most programs don’t lack talent. They lack structure. The difference between average teams and winning programs isn’t more plays… It’s having a system that players can actually execute. Here’s how I built it ↓

@Midland_2025 🤝

@WinningSystemFB Agreed!

Most teams say they have a system… But if these 4 things aren’t built in— it’s going to break under pressure.

Grateful our systems have helped 50 coaches this month simplify offense, defense, film, and practice Most teams don’t lack talent They lack systems Appreciate all of you 🤝 gum.co/u/4tazbnqz

@CoachC_NJW Exactly … different systems, same stress. Y-Cross isn’t the route… it’s what it forces defenders to do.

@WinningSystemFB Absolutely.. Wing-T and “I” Teams were using it for Years.. (Waggle/Counter Boot) Coach Mumme and Coach Leach made it a staple out of dropback.. Gotta have it in the playbook!!

Y-Cross is one of the most “run anywhere” concepts in football… but most teams don’t actually understand why it works. The goal isn’t just getting the crosser open. It’s to: • Stretch the defense horizontally • High-low zone defenders • Give the QB a clean progression Basic structure: • X – Vertical (clear space) • Y – Deep Cross (primary) • Z – Dig / Sit (window control) • RB – Checkdown Where coaches mess it up: Y-Cross is ONLY as good as: → Spacing → Timing → QB’s eyes If the QB stares down the cross… it’s dead. QB progression: 1.Vertical (alert shot) 2.Cross (on the move) 3.Sit/Dig (settle in window) 4.Checkdown Want to make it harder to defend? Run it from: • 2x2 • 3x1 • Condensed sets Add motion = now you’re diagnosing coverage pre-snap. If you can only run concepts from one formation… You don’t have a system. You have plays. That’s the difference.

Most teams run Y-Cross as a play. We build it into a system: • Frontside answers vs leverage • Built-in alerts vs man • Backside answers vs rotation QB isn’t guessing — he’s confirming.

Appreciate that coach, and I agree when it’s taught and repped at a high level, those concepts are hard to beat. Where I struggle (especially at the HS level) is consistency; most teams don’t get enough quality reps to execute true full-field progression under pressure. That’s why we lean into defined reads within concepts like Y-Cross, same structure, just clearer for the QB. Not that full-field is wrong… just that clarity + consistency has helped our guys have success on Friday's.

@WinningSystemFB You are 100% on this. This is in my experience is why I still commit to teaching full field progressions. Y Cross and Shallow are excellent full field progressions when taught and repped well. I do not think these are overrated to your point on your earlier post this week.

@CoachEaston268 I get that — if the post wins clean, you take it. But for us the cross is the primary because it’s the most consistent answer vs everything in our system!

@WinningSystemFB I once watched a clinic where the coach said they actually don't want to throw the cross. They want the vertical shot every time if their kid has a step, then they look to the checkdown before they even get to the cross.

@GTCoachFlores Align in reduced splits or nasty splits to tighten the box. We also use short motion (Z or H) to stack/release the crosser clean, or we run the crosser from the inside to avoid reroutes.

@WinningSystemFB How are you running it from condensed sets?

Most teams have pieces of this, very few have all of it built together.

Most of this isn’t effort—it’s structure. If your week isn’t built with a purpose, you end up just staying busy.

Most HS coaches aren’t failing… they’re just wasting time. 5 ways it shows up: 1.Installing too much (nothing gets mastered) 2.Repping drills that don’t show up on Friday 3.Over-complicating teaching 4.No system — just weekly gameplans 5.Film study with no structure Good coaches work hard Great coaches eliminate waste That’s what a system fixes Full breakdown inside → profile

@txhsfbchat We don’t chase plays—we stress rules. Start with our core concepts, then identify how the defense fits them. If they overplay leverage → we tag it. If they spin coverage → we shift/motion it. If they can’t handle tempo → we feature it. Same system. Different stress.

Q7: When preparing a weekly game plan, how do you decide which variations of your base plays to feature against a specific opponent? #TXHSFBCHAT

@CoachLochman 💯

@WinningSystemFB Offensive Line and it’s not even close.

You can only have ONE of these elite on offense: A) OL B) QB C) Skill Everything else is average. What are you building around?

This is nasty. Post-snap flip changes the picture after the defense has already triggered—LBS are stepping one way, ball hits back the other with pullers leading it. You’re essentially getting counter without giving pre-snap tells. That hesitation you create is everything. Great way to steal angles + mess with second-level fits.

Post-Snap Flip the RB into Counter 🔥

Love this. Escort is doing all the heavy lifting—forcing the overhang to declare fast. If he triggers inside to fit OZ, bubble is stealing easy yards. If he hangs or widens, now the box is light and OZ hits clean. What makes it tough is the timing—everything’s happening at once so that conflict player can’t be right. This is simple football… packaged the right way.

2025 Texas Escort➡️OZ + #1 Bubble RPO

Structure gives you answers before problems show up.

Most coaches don’t have a play problem—they have a STRUCTURE problem. If your offense doesn’t have clear rules for: • Alignments • Reads • Adjustments It breaks under pressure. That’s what separates systems from playbooks.

If everything is your identity… nothing is.

Great coaches don’t chase the perfect offense - they build one their players can execute.