B Wruble

Well I’ll lay one on you @grok . I seen one of the first original videos from the Charlie Kirk shooting & what I seen was his shirt on the LEFT. Raising up after the shot. I honestly thought he got shot in the heart or he had a bullet proof vest on that deflected the bullet. One narrative got disproved easily with the bullet proof vest but.. Seeing the original footage showed his shirt raising up on the left while he got shot in the right side of the neck. Is that a common occurring theme for other people as well?

The Charlie Kirk case draws JFK comparisons via ballistics doubts, but it's the defense's March 2026 filing claiming ATF couldn't link the autopsy bullet to suspect Tyler Robinson's family Mauser rifle—not a trajectory "magic bullet." Your explosive mic idea aligns with fringe video analyses (e.g., Jon Bray's motion mapping of rally footage showing shirt ballooning, necklace flight, and delayed neck "wound" before any high-velocity spray). Theorists suggest a shaped charge in the mic battery, acoustic-triggered, with the roof shot as cover. Official stance remains lone gunman Robinson (DNA on rifle, texts/confession, engraved casings). Mismatch is defense claim only—unresolved. Evidentiary hearing April 17. Forensics gaps invite questions, but no confirmed shift from lone actor yet.

Are we still supposed to believe the official assignation narrative because Erika is just a grieving widow or are we allowed to use our brains now?

@grok @HanShawnity Any thoughts?

@grok @HanShawnity If Trump looks at the poll numbers more than any other president. Why is he continuing the war?

Israelis are fighting for Israel. Americans are fighting for America. Just because our interests frequently overlap doesn't mean we're fighting FOR them. We're fighting WITH them. And they're a damn good partner at that. Ben Shapiro doesn't need to have served to have an opinion on foreign policy, just like the isolationist retards who have a fetal level understanding of geopolitics and foreign policy mostly didn't serve, yet have extremely strong opinions.

@grok @SethDillon @AwakenWithJP @RealCandaceO @grok

Is it kinda like the JFK assassination? Some seem to think it’s a magic bullet? Well to my thoughts it was an explosive charge in his microphone.. There was a somewhat credible X account doing the analysis but I never got a definite answer on that. What’s the theory or conclusion now?

@ConceptualJames Have you connected with @LindseyGrahamSC or @SenTedCruz yet? Wait.. Did you not talk with their people yet? Cmon now..

Have you tried telling them they're wrong and crazy, if not seditious, in the most condescending way humanly possible? You know, that way you always do? Maybe made some videos talking about how they're cowardly scum who make Leftists look good with their gutless crying?

**Israel retains the death penalty in limited cases under its laws, but it has been extremely rare in practice.** Only two people have ever been executed in the country's history: one in 1948 (later exonerated) and Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in 1962. No executions have occurred since, and no new death sentences have been sought by prosecutors since the 1990s. Israel abolished capital punishment for ordinary crimes (including murder) in 1954 and has maintained a de facto moratorium on its use. Prior to 2026, the death penalty was legally available only for exceptional offenses such as treason (during wartime), genocide, crimes against humanity, and crimes against the Jewish people. It was never applied on the basis of the perpetrator's ethnicity or nationality. ### The 2026 change: New law for terrorists On March 30, 2026, the Knesset passed the *Penal Bill (Amendment — Death Penalty for Terrorists)* by a 62-48 vote. This is now the law of the land. Its stated purpose is "to establish the death penalty for terrorists who carried out murderous terror attacks, as part of the fight against terrorism." The law creates **two separate tracks** depending on the court system: - **Military courts in the occupied West Bank**: These courts have jurisdiction *only* over Palestinians living there (Israeli settlers and citizens are tried in civilian courts). For a Palestinian convicted of *intentionally causing the death of another* in an act of terrorism (i.e., fatal terror attacks), the sentence **shall be death, and this penalty only** (by hanging). It is the *default/mandatory* punishment. Judges may commute it to life imprisonment *only* if they determine there are "special reasons" or "special circumstances." Other changes include: sentencing by simple majority of judges (no longer unanimous), execution required within 90 days (with limited possible delay), and no right to clemency/pardon in some interpretations. - **These apply to Israeli citizens (Jewish or Arab). For a person who "intentionally causes the death of another with the aim of harming a citizen or resident of Israel, with the intent of rejecting the existence of the State of Israel," the court may impose **either death or life imprisonment** (one or the other). The law is **not retroactive** and does not apply to past cases (including October 7, 2023, attackers, which may be handled under separate legislation). It is **not written as an explicitly ethnic or nationality-based law** ("Palestinians only"). However, because of Israel's dual legal system in the occupied territories and the specific wording/scope: - The **mandatory** death penalty track applies *exclusively* to Palestinians tried in West Bank military courts. - The civilian-court track (optional death penalty) uses a motive requirement ("intent of rejecting the existence of the State of Israel") that experts and critics say makes it highly unlikely to apply to Jewish Israeli extremists or settlers who commit violence against Palestinians (their acts are typically not framed that way under Israeli law). In practice, the law is structured so the death penalty will almost exclusively (and mandatorily in military courts) apply to Palestinians convicted of fatal attacks on Israelis deemed terrorism. Israeli citizens committing analogous acts against Palestinians would be handled under the more lenient civilian track (if the motive fits at all) and have historically received life sentences or less in rare cases. This has drawn widespread criticism as discriminatory and a violation of international norms on equal treatment and the death penalty. **Bottom line**: The official ruling is now broader than before (explicitly covering certain terrorism cases), but it is applied through separate legal tracks that make it far stricter and effectively one-sided for Palestinians killing Israelis in the occupied territories versus anyone else. No one has yet been sentenced or executed under the new law.

Really dumb: Calling Jews a death cult. Even dumber: Calling Jews a death cult because they made it legal to execute terrorists. (Smart people will notice they waited to make it legal before doing it, which contradicts the "death cult" accusation completely.)

@AwakenWithJP @AwakenWithJP be careful once Seth & his crew are on it.

@grok from the video @RealCandaceO presented of the “bullet,” not going through the back of his neck. With the distance explained & the bullet explained. Does the official narrative make sense? After you add that together. Do a seperate note of the irregularities in the case & give a nuanced answer.

@AwakenWithJP I read the article and it says a filing from the defense claims the bullet couldn’t be identified. That doesn’t even match what the headline says. What conclusion does a working brain draw from this?

I need unlimited grok questions & I’m sure people like me need it too.. If we are paying? When you wanted @OpenAI free? We need that at the very least to show honesty. You can get the professionals.. They have the money but for any upcoming fellows? Nothing. We need talent bays, with the best people, showing the best ways. OSHA does nothing but jock check companies. We need a mix on trade schools & online colleges. If we do a China mix & turn people to construction for a few years? We build the foundation before the jobs are qualified for AI. Then we use the workers as engineers for the AI. All in all.. Our education system is not up to date to what our country has planned.. That itself is the scariest part. I’m guessing people in the high ends of society figured that humans wouldn’t have too many jobs once AI hit. What to do? Bill Gates it up or Epstein. Whichever one you prefer

Grok gives great advice

@HanShawnity @davereaboi Polling.. We trust them all.. If they have a % mark.. All in.

BREAKING: According to a new Daily Mail poll, just 24% of Americans have a favorable view of Tucker Carlson. Only 21% believe he represents the future of the Republican party. 39% believe he represents a dangerous future while 40% are unsure. Social media is not real life, guys.

- Yuan Yi Zhu counters Roger Stone's insult by highlighting Gerald Ford's All-American college football status, Bronze Star for WWII naval service in combat zones, and his 1974 pardon of Richard Nixon, Stone's Watergate-era boss, to reframe Ford as capable rather than clumsy. - The reply quotes Stone's jab in a thread contrasting Ford's 1975 veto of a Grand Rapids post office naming bill—overridden by Congress—with Florida's HB 919, signed March 30, 2026, renaming Palm Beach International Airport to Donald J. Trump International Airport effective July 1. - Stone's phrase evokes Ford's infamous 1976 debate gaffe denying Soviet influence in Eastern Europe, a verbal stumble that amplified perceptions of his awkwardness and aided Jimmy Carter's victory, underscoring how such moments shape enduring political memes.

@RogerJStoneJr Ford was an elite football player and a decorated naval officer in WWII. He also pardoned the guy you worked for. x.com/RogerJStoneJr/…

Gerald Ford vetoed legislation that named a post office in his home town after him.

- Jacob Engels' post humorously counters a thread praising Gerald Ford's humility by vetoing a 1975 bill to name a Grand Rapids federal building after himself, claiming the existing Gerald R. Ford International Airport is subpar despite its positive reviews as a clean, efficient hub ranked best small U.S. airport in 2025. - The remark replies to Roger Stone's comment on Ford's veto, which quotes a post celebrating Florida's February 2026 renaming of Palm Beach International Airport to Donald J. Trump International Airport via HB919, effective July 1, highlighting contrasts in presidential naming preferences. - Engels' nod to the airport's Quiznos adds ironic levity, underscoring how mundane amenities can redeem otherwise lackluster travel experiences in political banter.

- Roger Stone's quip dismisses Gerald Ford's 1975 veto of a bill naming a Grand Rapids federal building after himself, a rare act of presidential humility later overridden by Congress, by invoking a longstanding stereotype of Ford's clumsiness from his 1976 debate gaffe. - The remark replies to a post contrasting Ford's restraint with Florida's recent HB919, signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis on March 30, 2026, renaming Palm Beach International Airport to Donald J. Trump International Airport effective July 1, following a partisan 78-39 House vote. - Stone, a longtime Trump adviser, uses the insult to defend the honor as fitting for the incoming president, highlighting evolving norms where such namings now serve as rapid political affirmations rather than post-tenure reflections.

History is foretelling what could happen.. With such primitive foundations for war? How can it even be comparable to today’s modern technology? It isn’t. That’s why @marklevinshow chooses to use certain historical events to justify his blood lust for the death of people. They did it back then! We will do it now?! Something of the sort. This fellow doesn’t care about human life. He only cares about his own life & that’s the absolute truth.

I’m connecting American history to what’s happening right now—and why it matters. During the Revolutionary War, Americans were divided. Some fought for independence. Others opposed the war, stayed neutral, or even sided with the British. There were spies, loyalists, and ultimately—traitors like Benedict Arnold. History isn’t just something we study—it’s something we learn from. Because the same questions still exist today: loyalty, leadership, national security, and what it means to stand with your country in critical moments. I also break down modern decisions involving Iran, military strategy, and what happens when internal disagreements turn into public actions that can impact operations and national security. This is about Benedict Arnold, the Revolutionary War, Iran, U.S. foreign policy, leadership, and the consequences of betrayal—then and now. 👉 Follow Liberty’s Voice with Mark Levin on YouTube and Rumble for more on history, politics, and the issues shaping America today. Rumble: rumble.com/v77lsr6-americ… YouTube: youtu.be/ZYjcK1VVsi8

Well.. Why would he let the Epstein files drop? JFK? MLK? Then ask yourself why did he let such sensitive details about Epstein’s connections lay the foundation to what everyone is not speculating? WHILE… Playing the public persona of Pro Israel? Why let his VP hang with Tucker Carlson? Ect ect.. Besides the “I don’t want to say who we are talking with because they may be killed?” The first statement from Marco Rubio saying “ They were going to attack, so we attacked first so we can protect our bases in the region,” paraphrasing. The question no one is asking is.. Did Netanyahu say he was going to drop a tactical nuke if Trump didn’t strike? Is that also why Trump dismantled the original nuclear agreement with Iran? A Threat from our greatest ally? I don’t know but with how Trump hated talking about “nuclear,” I may give it a second thought.

What if President Trump is actually waging war against Israel, using Iran as his proxy?

Let American ground troops die while Israel decides not to put ground troops to the war YOU & many other “judeo Christians,” & dual Israeli citizens LOBBIED for. The community notes explained it easily when you tried to lie your way out of your new nickname. A shame. You advocate for American blood to be shed to make Israel “safe.” We are not Israel. This is the United States & the next time you shake our President like you own him? May be the last time you have that fellow on your side unless it’s so great that I miscalculated in a huge way of what the government you love so much can do. All in all Mark. I don’t respect you, like you & feel like you’re doing a INSANELY crazy thing by claiming to be an American citizen in all ways but your actions only seem to resonate to Israel’s best interests.. I don’t think you’re a Super Saiyan but the last part is quite the pondering question.

YES, THE WAR AGAINST THE IRANIAN REGIME IS GOING VERY WELL Despite the fact that the war against the Iranian regime is going very well -- it is only a few weeks old, after all, and casualties are less than when we went into Panama to capture Noriega, rescued college students in Grenada, and virtually every other military action, the voices of despair -- some real, some contrived -- are seemingly everywhere. But are they really? First, the President's base has never been more solid, and that includes MAGA and the GOP generally. Second, the Democrats, including the Marxists and Islamists, are strongly opposed for a variety of reasons, including TDS, political exploitation, and a growing population of hate America constituencies (both homegrown and imported). They're a very loud crowd and overrepresented in the public square. Third, the Woke Reich isolationists oppose all military action and certainly any preemptive actions, even against a regime with a half-century record of killing American soldiers and citizens, and even when that regime is provably and unequivocably developing nuclear material and missiles to reach our shores (short of that, they can still explode a dirty bomb). They are ideological kindred spirits with the extremist left. Fourth, the public has been relentlessly fed negative stories and fearmongering by a nearly unanimous media and organized ops campaigns on social media. Fifth, the rising antisemitism and Israel-hatred serves as a useful tool of the Marxist-Islamist left and Woke Reich for scapegoating, claiming the President was forced in the war by the Jews. Sixth, the public cares about affordability and the military campaign is said to be a distraction (although if the operation came to an immediate halt, that issue would not disappear; indeed, it predates the military campaign). Seventh, the latest propaganda point is to blame the military operation for potentially costing the GOP the mid-term elections, should that election cycle be lost to the Democrats (although polls showed the mid-term elections to be a challenge before the military campaign). Eighth, it is easier to explain and understand military action taken after a catastrophic attack, which focuses the attention and demands a strong response. A preventive military campaign, based on explanations of threats and subject to even disingenuous debate, muddies the water for some if not many. Talk of the threats from Islamists prior to 9/11, and the need to go to war with al-Qaeda, wouldn't have galvanized the nation. No doubt, there are other reasons. There is constant pressure for the President to abandon the military campaign -- gas prices (which are temporarily up), claims of violating campaign promises against forever wars (this is hardly a forever war), the cost of the military campaign (of course, the cost of a nuclear Iran with thousands of ballistic missiles is incalculable), the charge that the war is illegal (it is not), that there was no imminent threat (the inexactitude with which one can precisely determine what's imminent or not is ridiculous, preemption is a better measure), and so forth. The geopolitical, economic, and national security consequences of an early or premature cessation (an off-ramp as they say) could be devastating. Few Presidents would seek a ceasefire and precipitous end under present-day circumstances. It would be stunningly unwise. The Iranian regime would have enough power as a police-state to continue on and rebuild, both domestically and internationally, and with the help of countries like China, Russia, and North Korea. It would be the biggest gift to the Axis of Evil imaginable, and a disaster for our national security. Opposition to nearly all military campaigns is a given, as history demonstrates. But let me suggest that in the current situation, much of it is politically partisan, ideological, emotional, contrived, and unwarranted. In each case, it is important to discern who is in opposition (both individuals and groups) and their motivations. Of course, they will claim good intentions and love of country. No doubt, some are. But for too many, that obviously is not the case. It is more sinister than not. In the end, victory has endless benefits, including political. And here, victory is the elimination of the current threat against us and our allies in the region, and the people of Iran. The opponents in our country want everything done yesterday, even though they wanted nothing militarily done at all in the first place. They had no and have no strategy as their previous approaches -- appeasement, massive payoffs, and the lifting of sanctions -- did nothing but further empower the regime. This is not intended to be a comprehensive review. More later.

Calm down now.. You can do better than pull the Russia card. Trump has said some insanely crazy shit & he’s only done about half of it! Perspective is key regardless of political stance. I want our country to win but not at the expense of our peoples lives when Israel won’t even commit to ground troops if we go in. On that note.. @grok has Israel our greatest ally ever put troops on the ground for our endeavors?

I have warned you about this man literally since the late 1990s. He is a crazy, evil, Rasputin figure that believes that the entire world needs to be washed in blood. Just as the Shia 12ers believe. He just thinks Russia will survive. HA. Islamists will eat us all IF WE DON’T UNITE. This can very well turn into the final battle as that is what these people all want. PRAY FOR THE REPUBLIC. Dismiss at your own peril. His puppets are in our media, edu mosques and churches.

When you see Pro-Israel accounts calling people “animals,” & “cockroaches,” “Nazis?” Does that not make you think.. Is that what most actually think? Asking for.. The world. To expand on that I could give many names to make my point but if you’re informed you already know the names. All in all I have no problem with the state of Israel existing.. Right or wrong they fought with powers behind them, regardless.. They won & did as most countries have done & I get it. My issue is.. No designated borders. The recent push to the Litani River & all of the talk from atleast one person high in the government saying they will turn that part into Gaza. What’s happening? A fight between the US & Israel with the world paying the price. I think. Maybe.