Spectre

@JoeRoganRecaps People really think Australians live like this with crazy snakes and spiders in our homes

Joe Rogan & Ryan Bingham on Australia: ROGAN: “Australia is bigger than the United States, but has less people than LA.” BINGHAM: “Everything there will kill you. They have crazy snakes, spiders, and sharks.” ROGAN: “They have a f*cked up oppressive government unfortunately.”

@LogarithmicRex Its different when you're the number 1 DeFi protocol with many other projects using / integrated with it.

It's hard for me to wrap my head around this Aave and KelpDAO bailout. Can someone explain to me where this energy was for any of the 123 other hacks >$10MM?

Comments showing people don't understand what a Hard Fork is

@EgorikNFT Did the same to me after calling him out for not keeping his word and being erratic.

am i sleeping more than 0.6% of supply 2027 holder and founder blocked me?? he literally killed my money and I have the right to say anything about him because he literally deceived retail traders

@xbt2027 Keep changing your mind on wtf is happening. Its too erratic

and here is my decision NO MORE LAUNCHES BY ME NO D17 i hereby make 2027 the de facto infrastructure coin any future launches by others will benefit 2027 and XBT will remain our only memecoin this structure is enough for success.

@__dr4c0__ Man. Shit keeps changing consistently. Dont know wtf is going on now. Xbt needs to stick to his word

People comparing Government Bail out to DeFi Recovery funds don't get it

@xbt2027 Makes sense. Lets win 🫂

@XBTSpectre good one every manual launch results in more mindshare division, raises more questions, and is inferior to what we can do with the smart contract infrastructure so i believe doing them through the system will be a better approach

D17 Here is everything i want to say about what comes up next. Please read it all and then we can talk about it and i'll answer all questions. Currently we have 2 tokens 2027 (ETH): 0x3483FE3baC9Ca981f53E92f05603E1B32cd1b3cC and XBT (SOL): AdsLPtW1KvKAw3QQLDST3M9cm57TeXZpbAhiKS27xbt D17 is the final step towards our goal. This will again will be similar to how 2027 and XBT were allocated. D17 will produce a token (unnamed). This token will serve as the permissionless ownership token of an infrastructure, a pipeline of smart contracts that will allow anyone to launch a token using our cooperative methodology. A fraction of all raises using it will automatically buyback this token, making it a perpetual inflow of buys. Here is how i see things; List the resulting token directly on Hyperliquid (HIP-1). Provide a UI for all participants to claim their allocated tokens. Provide the UI for the launch mechanism. List all 3 tokens (XBT,2027 too) on Hyperliquid Spot. More about D17: Both 2027 and XBT holders have a way to receive allocation for this token. For 2027 holders: Nothing needs to be done. 2027 will translate into direct ownership. For example, 10th largest holder of 2027 owns 4.7M 2027 tokens (0.47% of supply). If they hold this amount until D17 concludes (or have this amount at that time), they will automatically be allocated for 0.47% of the new token as well. For XBT holders: They have the opportunity to burn their XBT tokens by sending their tokens to this address (again, this can happen until D17 concludes): E1jDr3H6X49CJr8ro5whPvuz6SwGMoBXcCUsMwosMJaN more info on XBT allocations can be seen here: x.com/xbt2027/status… Here is how the tokenomics work a maximum of 35% goes to 2027 holders XBT burners get collectively 15% 10% is allocated in D17 (this is a small amount, most distribution is for 2027 and XBT holders) 25% for Hyperliquid SPOT MM, this will give us a great power to absorb sell pressure and let the token thrive remaining 15% for various purposes, treasury, grants, listings on other venues, etc. this makes the token very much a community owned one, and infrastructure too, as a direct result. I think we can entirely skip an LP, make this token truly a crypto asset, use ALL funds raised in D17 for market making. What happens to 2027 and XBT post D17? The goal is to provide an infrastructure to generate superior speculative assets. 2027 and XBT then are both native speculative of this system, each on one chain. Their value proposition is directly tied to the system that generated them, their distribution process, their superiority in distribution and adoption. Such is the vision. One infrastructure token natively on Hyperliquid Two speculative tokens of this ecosystem, each in one major chain. D17 is planned to start May 1st, 4:00 PM UTC I will share more details on its exact implementation. Now, you ask and i answer.

@xbt2027 Hopefully there's explanation to the 9 launches that were planned before D17 and why the changes were made. Lets win 🫂

roundtable in around 5 hours

@lesabrefomo Things keep changing. What happened to the 9 launches before D17? Now there's a burn for XBT and D17 is launching in 6 days?

the game theory on this is nuts to think through

@xbt2027 Have the 9 launches before D17 launch now been abandoned?

absolutely, you got 6 days it's a land grab

@xbt2027 So there won't be 9 more launches before D17? Things keep changing

@xbt2027 @onchaindreamer 🤔 how many should we expect now?

@onchaindreamer probably not

@thedefiedge Defi will survive. This event will only make the industry more resilient

There's 99,410 ETH in bad debt from the KelpDao exploit. The good news? DeFi protocols have united with donations, and 90% is covered so far. Here's a list of who's contributing:

@pk79z Flexing a 3k bill you know they split too 😂

This is gayer than gay porn. Aus cabal lmao

@maddimogs HJs Frozen Coke > Maccas Frozen Coke

hungry jacks is better than maccas and its not even close bro sorry

@mephXBT D27 fixes this

seeing lots of hype around printr i don't wanna talk about it being organic or not but you have to understand, ideally we need to kill bonding curves and move to smth completely new or old :) the main issue is that the risk is asymmetrical. Devs or the guys who are bidding the absolute bottom do not risk anything, because they cannot be dumped on while your average trader, who sees a token at 5x-6x from the starting point, risks everything, unless they have some kind of insider info game always adjusts itself and participants start playing by the most efficient strategies and with decentralized bonding curves, it's always bundling/multiwalleting the bottom and just rugging others if you want to design a proper game, deploying a token must have a higher risk, than just trading. And traders on all levels of "pre-bonding" (let's say till the token migrates to the AMM) need to have relatively the same amount of risk (those who bought earlier should not have OOM better opportunities than the ones who bought later) peace

@__dr4c0__ Hoping it won't be gamed, Ofc trusting @xbt2027 and @Gutslab have vetting processes in control and won't pick teams that don't have the entire ecosystem in mind. Although none of this won't matter once the mechanism becomes permissionless

@0x_Spectre_ Fair point. The next 9 launches are external teams using the mechanism. Only structural link to 2027 = the 10% buyback. Vetting is the real bottleneck, not the mechanism itself.