The XRP Cipher Podcast

Welcome to The XRP Cipher Podcast. Our thesis is: •tokenization is real •interoperability is necessary •fragmentation is a problem •future market structure will need bridges between systems

describe your portfolio in one word we’ll wait

🎯

@Vet_X0 L

More Permissioned DEX activity between $RLUSD and $EUROP on the XRP Ledger. Because unlike in TradFi, the XRPL doesn't close over the weekend, it's 24/7. P-DEX allows financial institutions to trade amongst XRP accounts that for example are KYC'd or have AML. On XRP.

@mrnguyen007 Thank you for this final confirmation to Unfollow you.

Let me get the facts straight for those who said Trump rug pulling people with his meme coin When you invest in anything you must DYOR.... Nobody force you to buy Trump meme coin Yes, meme coins is not a stablecoin Nobody to blame but you I did bought 100 Trump meme coins

@NoContextHumans Cameraman gets an F+

Seconds before the 2011 Tsunami in Japan😳🌊

IDK but this couldn’t have helped. 159 times (counting each @-mention of a US politician or official political account representing them). This is based on a complete review of @mrnguyen007’s original (non-reply) posts from June 24, 2026 through July 24, 2026. Nearly all such mentions relate to advocacy for the Clarity Act and consistently tag accounts including: •Individual elected officials / the President (e.g., @LeaderJohnThune, @SenWarren, @Sen_Alsobrooks, @SenRubenGallego, @SenThomTillis, @SenAdamSchiff, @SenAlexPadilla, @SenatorTimScott, @SenLummis, @JohnBoozman, @realDonaldTrump). •Official party/Senate/White House accounts used to address them as a group (e.g., @SenateGOP, @SenateDems, @WhiteHouse). Breakdown: •42 posts containing @SenateGOP (almost always paired with @SenateDems and/or @LeaderJohnThune, plus occasional longer lists of senators or the President/White House) account for 152 of the mentions. •5 additional posts that tag only other politicians/accounts (mainly @SenWarren, @realDonaldTrump, and/or @WhiteHouse) account for the remaining 7. No other significant US politician handles appear in the period. Short replies and non-political posts were excluded.

Dear X, Thank you for your response.. I'm not in X to make a living, but rather sharing crypto news & updates to my followers.. The monetize money I get paid goes to support charities & followers.. How are my posts are manipulating & spam? Make it make sense..

The strongest part of the setup XRPL is not starting with only a white paper. It now has: - working x402 integration; - XRP and RLUSD payment support; - agent identity and risk infrastructure; - an AI ecosystem hub; - recorded mainnet agentic transactions; - an institutional XRP treasury collaborating with the - infrastructure provider; - a ledger already optimized for payments, exchange, and rapid deterministic settlement.

@24hrscrypto1 @UpholdInc @xrpl_adam I got something free I can’t do anything with this You took back my free gift I WANT ANSWERS!!!!!

Dear @UpholdInc, if this timeline is accurate, it raises several serious questions that deserve a clear and transparent explanation. I’m not making accusations… however.. I’m simply laying out the timeline as it appears. Many XRP holders are confused and frustrated by how this unfolded, and I believe they deserve clarity. 2023: Uphold tells XRP holders to keep their XRP on Uphold to qualify for the Evernode (EVR) airdrop. 2024: EVR gets distributed… but users can’t buy, sell, trade, or withdraw it. 2026: Uphold announces it’s removing everyone’s EVR balances, citing liquidity and regulatory requirements. So XRP holders were encouraged to hold their XRP, received an asset they couldn’t use, and now that asset is being removed…

@DailyLoud Typical coward that needs a gun to feel powerful

A man brought a loaded gun to the beach and points it at someone he got in an argument with 👀🤯

@Morecryptoonl @CryptoCowboy589 Thanks for the response

first and foremost, Youtube video views. XRP videos barely get any views compared to Solana, ETH or BTC. I need to focus my energy towards what people are interested in. All the content is community-focused. It depends on the community what they want to see. They decide by clicking on the videos (or not).

Mastery isn’t about catching every move. It’s about knowing when not to act. Stop letting FOMO and FUD control your decisions. Build clarity, structure, and consistency with the MCO family.

@Morecryptoonl @CryptoCowboy589 ??

@Morecryptoonl @CryptoCowboy589 Thanks for your feedback. Just curious, how do you measure interest?

🙄You are free to prefer LINK. But repeating obsolete talking points and demonstrably false “not XRPL” claims shows you have not researched the ecosystem’s current status deeply enough to dismiss the XRP thesis. 1. “Institutions are adopting LINK, not XRPL” is provably false. 2. “Institutions adopting LINK” DTCC is adopting Chainlink infrastructure…..not announcing that it is buying, holding or staking LINK. 3. “XRP sales fund acquisitions that benefit only Ripple equity” is another unsupported absolute. Expanded prime brokerage, custody, treasury management, RLUSD collateral and institutional distribution benefit XRPL. LINK’s future staking and value capture model is a thesis. XRP’s future liquidity and settlement model is also a thesis. Treating your projections as facts and the opposing projections as fantasy is advocacy, not analysis.

@XRPCipherPod @chainlinkthulhu @Lilgucci2 @ashgoblue @ChainLinkGod @evernorth_jp 🫡

1/ Everyone seems to be waiting on the Fed these days. The builders aren’t. Three things shipped in the XRP universe over the last two weeks. None of them needed a rate cut. 🧵👇 evernorth.xyz/blog-post-03-1…

High School wrestler is going viral after he pսnched his opponent after he pressed his head to the ground while getting up😬

@chainlinkthulhu @DrakeLinked @Lilgucci2 @ashgoblue @ChainLinkGod @evernorth_jp 🫡

@DrakeLinked @XRPCipherPod @Lilgucci2 @ashgoblue @ChainLinkGod @evernorth_jp 🤭

The LINK argument is still a thesis, not a settled economic fact and it is no different in principle from the XRP thesis. Every serious digital asset investment is based on projecting how future network usage might create demand for the native asset. XRP holders project that institutional settlement, tokenization, FX liquidity and bridge usage could increase demand for XRP. LINK holders project that future DONs, staking, slashing, fee conversion and economic security requirements could increase demand for LINK. Both depend on infrastructure scaling, institutions adopting it and the token actually capturing value from that usage. So why should the LINK thesis automatically be treated as more credible? Much of the argument presented is based on architecture that is not fully deployed. Super linear staking, thousands of LINK secured DONs, LINK based loss protection pools and proportional access to future network cash flows are projections. Some claims are simply incorrect: a USD secured DON would not have permanently frozen revenue potential, LINK appreciation is not mathematically required for security to scale, and owning a percentage of LINK does not give someone that same percentage of Chainlink’s cash flows. Chainlink has a legitimate network, real integrations and developing token economics. But XRP also has a legitimate ledger, real infrastructure, existing liquidity functions and potential institutional use cases. Neither thesis deserves to be dismissed merely because parts of its future value capture model are not fully operational yet. The standard should be consistent: either future utility projections are acceptable when supported by infrastructure and economic logic, or they are speculative for both LINK and XRP. You cannot present LINK’s theoretical end state as inevitable while mocking XRP’s projected utility as fantasy. The LINK thesis is not inherently “better.” It simply has different assumptions. The real question for both assets is the same: Will adoption translate into sustained token demand, restricted available supply and measurable economic value capture? Until that happens at scale, both remain investment theses not proven outcomes.

@XRPCipherPod @Lilgucci2 @ashgoblue @ChainLinkGod @evernorth_jp The entire crypto industry is childsplay, this hasn't even started yet, the whole industry is still in a proof of concept phase. You should absolutely wait until the bootstrapping phase is over before investing, that won't be a crowded trade.

Working together to do exactly what for ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca ? The Chainlink company and network yup. The ERC-20 token on the Ethereum network. DTCC adopting Chainlink technology does not automatically mean DTCC must purchase or hold LINK. The value-accrual path to the token is indirect. So stay in your lane.

@Lilgucci2 @ashgoblue @ChainLinkGod @evernorth_jp This is what working together looks like.

@CryptoCowboy589 @Morecryptoonl @CryptoCowboy589 I’ve noticed this reduction in XRP coverage as well.

Idk what happened with you guys but I used to watch your channel every couple of days for XRP updates, then you started putting them out only for members so I joined. Then you barely put any out so I canceled. And now in your post you include all the top alt coins except xrp? Wild.

You wake up and Bitcoin is at $40,000. First thought?

Market capitalization is the result……not the cause For example, suppose institutional demand pushes the marginal clearing price to $200 while approximately 60 billion XRP circulate. The displayed market capitalization would be $12 trillion, even though nowhere near $12 trillion had to enter the market. Most XRP may not have traded at all. Market cap is therefore: * A valuation identity * A comparison metric * A consistency check It is not the primary price setting mechanism