Edger retweetledi
Edger
13.8K posts

Edger retweetledi
Edger retweetledi

Minnesota pay attention- this is Amy Klobuchar’s gsme plan.
The Original Grey Beard Biker™ (Michael)@_rockytop_biker
Here is a reminder to be very careful who you vote for - especially in primaries. Case in point: Abigail Spanberger positioned herself as a very moderate Democrat. She was elected governor of Virginia. Since then she's gone against all her campaign promises. She is a radical! 🤬
English
Edger retweetledi
Edger retweetledi
Edger retweetledi
Edger retweetledi
Edger retweetledi

This story has been buried by the MSM in Minnesota.
PNW Conservative@PNWConservative
So we don’t forget… Melissa Hortman was the ONLY Democrat to vote against healthcare for illegals in Minnesota. She was the deciding vote. Then she was assass*nated.
English
Edger retweetledi
Edger retweetledi

This is why no one trusts the media anymore
The Rabbit Hole@TheRabbitHole
The rise of white supremacy was a media generated narrative. This is observable:
English

@TheLucyShow1 @Ikennect Depending on management and employee history they could be fired or at least written up. It is theft from the owner.
English
Edger retweetledi

Just so infuriating. Democrats who supported the Biden/Harris open border invasion have blood on their hands.
Libs of TikTok@libsoftiktok
8-year-old Mora Gerety was kiIIed by an illegal while she was walking down the street Not a single Democrat protested for her. This is why I support ICE.
English
Edger retweetledi
Edger retweetledi
Edger retweetledi

Senate Majority Leader Thune has 12 days — until the end of April — to pass the SAVE America Act
before I actively get involved in the primaries in Louisiana & Texas.
🗓️ May 16: LA
🗓️ May 26: TX
CC: @LeaderJohnThune
English
Edger retweetledi

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

English
Edger retweetledi
Edger retweetledi





















