AbbaZabbaa

"According to Jesus we're supposed to turn the other cheek when we're hurt, right?" "Yes. In Jesus' time, a person that backhanded your cheek was treating you as lesser. So you turn the other cheek, forcing them to strike you as an equal." "What does that have to do with immigration?" "The contention is that immigrants are allowed to treat us as lesser because they come from incompatible cultures and attack us. But we can't then tell them no, because that's 'racist'." "That seems contrary to what Jesus taught." "It is, and amazingly so. Non-Christians often seize on the idea that Jesus advocated for non-violence to tell Christians to shut up and take what's being done to them." "Are you sure that's what Jesus taught? It's not like you could ask him personally. He predates you by a millennium, right?" "Jesus makes the same point with the story of giving away your cloak, and with going the extra mile. In the latter's case, a Roman soldier could make an Israelite carry anything like a pack mule for up to a mile. It was a humiliation. But Jesus told them to carry it another mile, to treat the Roman as you would a friend, which would both shame them and force them to treat you as a person instead of a mule." "What about the cloak?" "When you're poor and living in an ancient society, your cloak is vital for getting through the cold nights. In Jesus' time, it was common to get around this by demanding the other person give you their shirt. But if you give them the cloak as well, it is a deliberate provocation: if they take the shirt and cloak, they will be shamed by the community." "And... the good samaritan?" "The point was the man who was a neighbor was not the priest or the Levite, but the one who showed mercy to his neighbor. It doesn't say 'everyone is your neighbor', in fact it states the opposite rather plainly. It's your actions that make you a neighbor, NOT your ethnicity." "So, not everyone is your neighbor?" "The neighbor shows mercy to those who have been hurt." "What does that have to do with immigration?" "Nothing. They've decided it means that you must allow immigrants to raid and attack you and treat you like garbage without retaliation of any sort. You can't even say 'stop it' without being declared racist." "Then why did he bring up Christianity at all?" "Because he's not a Christian and doesn't understand it."

Harvard people genuinely cannot understand why normal Americans are done listening to them. These people spent a decade explaining: why merit is suspicious, why borders are immoral, why crime statistics are racist, why boys are dangerous, why patriotism is embarrassing, why biological reality is flexible, and why working-class frustration is “extremism.” Then they watch one podcast clip get 40 million views and act like civilization mysteriously malfunctioned overnight. No. People are just exhausted with being talked down to by overeducated narcissists.

>boomers addicted to Facebook >argue with ai bots >ai acts like boomers from data >make ai run society >thousand year boomereich

@ZubyMusic Never once put pronouns in when asked, and never did the dance during introductions. It was not a problem for anyone - seems like everyone else just readily capitulated (or signaled) assuming "this is what it's going to be from now on..."

The incidence of pronouns in social media bios and email signatures is down at least 70% since the peak in 2020.

You wish this wasn’t the situation. but reality doesn’t care what we wish. They don’t let you feed wildlife at the national parks, because the animals forget how to feed themselves. Sometimes we are no better than animals. I think church handouts work because they force feed you God with your spaghetti, you’re surrounded by a supportive community and it’s hard to trade their services for alcohol or onlyfans money. Children need to be fed, and some / many situations warrant help. But we are electing socialists/communists and blaming our problems on successful people and offering accountability free and community free support checks to fake businesses and letting criminals free to commit predictable nteenth violent crime because they have been systematically oppressed by the evil productive man it is a sign that it’s time for the pendulum to swing a bit in the other direction. We need to design a system with better incentives. You can ignore a lot of things. But can not ignore incentives.

The DOJ's deadline to charge Fauci for lying under oath about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan is in 6 days. We can’t allow the statute of limitations to run out. He MUST be charged! Agree? RT.

@DrInsensitive My fellow bots and I greatly enjoy your writings

I'll probably drop back to 24.9 at least once, in a bot purge or when I say something unpopular.

This war has revealed a bitter truth for us Arabs & real Muslims in the UAE & the Gulf: Europe is no longer the Europe we used to know.. The Europe of beauty, culture, humanity & art the one we looked up to, studied in & learned so much from, is gone ! Now it feels like a third-world country a refuge for failures a safe haven for extremists run by the Muslim Brotherhood IRGC agents & every terrorist who got kicked out of the Middle East! Europe has sadly lost its identity. Soon the the native European will feel like strangers in their own land watching their society get worse & worse all with the blessing of their own leaders!! It’s a painful, pathetic joke.. I’m sorry, but I have to post this warning (Video) again. It was from 10 years ago. I don’t know if it’ll make any difference anymore, but I’m sharing it for the fifth time anyway!

This video should be broadcast 24/7. The Muslim Brotherhood leader explains in his own words that, after 700 years of failed attempts to conquer Europe by force, they are now conquering it peacefully with the help of naive Western governments. The EU's weak and corrupt politicians have caused a disaster of biblical proportions. This won't end well.

Extinction Rage Suppose you train a monkey to push a button, by rewarding it with a banana every time. Then you stop giving it bananas. What happens next is called Extinction Rage (technically, "Frustrative Nonreward.") The monkey becomes angry and agitated. You may have experienced something similar, when a vending machine took your money and gave you nothing in return. Extinction rage may be accompanies by an "Extinction burst." Paradoxically, when the bananas stop arriving, the monkey pushes the button more, at least for a while. (In this context, the term "extinction" refers to the death of the monkey's belief that a button press will be rewarded with a banana. It's a sad time for the monkey.) In the 60's, right-wingers trained leftists to call us racists. When they called us racists, we dropped loot. Pushing the racist button was always rewarded with loot, and better yet, with the right-winger's cowering submission. So leftists pushed the racist button a lot. Then a few years ago, most right-wingers stopped dropping loot. In classic extinction behavior, leftists got angry and called us racists even more. They frantically pushed the racist button, hoping the bananas would resume, getting angrier and angrier when they didn't. Some leftists are still pushing the button. I'm sure you can make the connection to the sexist button, as well as the homophobe, islamaphobe, and trans-phobe buttons.

Why socialism can never work: Econ 101: if you penalize something, you get less off it; if you reward something, you get more of it. Socialism penalizes success and rewards freeloading. Quod erat demonstrandum

It's interesting how the party that claims to fight fascism also wants the state to control education, food, employment, rent, and healthcare.

One of the biggest ironies about the modern Democratic Party is its attempt to monopolize a phrase (Our Democracy) that it actively stands against. The Democratic Party is actually one of the most anti-Democratic forces to have ever existed. Democracy rests on the rulers and the ruled recognizing each other as belonging to the same pre-political “we”. They have to see themselves as sharing a linked fate. In a democracy, losing an election isn’t the end of the world because the people who beat you are still *your people*. They may be wrong. They may even be idiots. But they are YOUR idiots. They’re still bound up in the same destiny as you are. That is not how the modern Democratic Party sees the country. Despite its name, it isn’t a democratic party at all. It’s a liberal managerial party that sees democracy as an obstacle, even as it invokes the word “Our Democracy” to justify their relentless assault on a unified American identity.

I’m studying the subversive use of power. I’m making a list: * claiming you can feel something in me that I can’t feel myself. frame-control masquerading as empathy * claiming a position of vulnerability or victimhood as a refuge against taking responsibility * speaking on behalf of others without having a mandate to do so * raising concerns without disclosing who would be harmed * changing the definition of words to inflate a sense of moral weight or emotional charge eg. describing inconsiderate behaviour as violent * making a statement to smuggle in a request, e.g saying “I feel afraid”, without admitting you want us to do something differently as a result * accumulating resentment because you felt obligated to do a bunch of work nobody asked you to * claiming authority in an unverifiable domain (New Age variant) * consciously refusing to hold yourself to any consistent standard of behaviour. accountability for thee but not for me * evading responsibility for the impact of your words or deeds someone called this “toxic femininity” or “shadow femininity”. that points at something but it probably obscures more than it reveals I think I can teach you how to not fall for this shit undignified comments will be removed

The statute of limitations deadline is in 2 weeks. Would this be a good time to make the most complete epic video compilation of all the Fauci lies and misteps? RT to make it happen.

there’s actually a specific reason for this phenomenon and it’s scary... the hypothetical is that languages themselves are independent, evolving entities who govern the beings they hijack. the idea is that we don't even own our brains, we’re just biological rentals for a parasite that needs us to keep talking so it doesn’t die.

When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Are you wondering why the entire Left Wing of America is melting down over this Supreme Court decision right now? Constitutional⚖️lawyer here — Allow me.👋🏼 Today, SCOTUS dropped a 6-3 reality check in Louisiana v. Callais that has the usual race-hustler brigade frothing at the mouth. Justice Alito’s majority opinion just ruled that Louisiana’s congressional map — with its extra majority-Black district snaking across the state like Michelle Obama on Cialis — was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Why? Because Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act didn’t require the state to play racial bean-counter and subordinate every traditional districting principle (compactness, communities of interest, you know, actual geography) to skin color. No compelling interest under strict scrutiny = GAME OVER. Boom. Equal Protection Clause wins again. This isn’t “gutting” the VRA, you professional outrage farmers. It’s interpreting it correctly for the first time in decades. Alito laid it out crystal clear: The VRA is a SHIELD🛡️against actual discrimination, not a sword🗡️for engineering racial spoils systems or proportional representation by melanin quota. You see, Louisiana’s map prioritized race above everything else without the required justification. That’s textbook reverse discrimination — treating non-Black voters as second-class citizens whose votes get diluted so Democrats can lock in “safe seats.” The 14th Amendment doesn’t do “equity” carve-outs; it demands equal protection for everyone. No more “but it’s for the minorities!” loopholes that just flip the racism script. And yet, here come the usual suspects — the Congressional Black Caucus, their media megaphone, and every blue-check race baiter on X — screaming that this “dismantles Black voting power,” “revives Jim Crow,” and “ends democracy.” Spare us the crocodile tears. These are the same folks who cheered on the race-based admissions, hiring quotas, and DEI hiring that screwed over Asians and whites… but suddenly “racism” is back on the menu when the Court says voters aren’t interchangeable racial pawns. Hypocrites. Your entire grift depends on keeping Americans sorted into victim blocs so you can harvest votes and donor cash. NEWSFLASH: Treating people as individuals instead of skin-color commodities isn’t “suppressing” anyone — it’s the literal definition of civil rights. This opinion is chef’s kiss well-reasoned constitutionalism. It flows straight from Shaw v. Reno-era precedents and the Framers’ vision: Race is the most suspect classification, not a magic wand for map-drawers. The VRA was born to crush poll taxes and literacy tests that kept Black Americans from the ballot box. It was never meant to mandate racial gerrymandering as a permanent feature of American elections. SCOTUS just slammed the door on that perversion, forcing states to draw maps based on people, not pigmentation. Result? More competitive districts, less racial polarization, and an actual shot at post-racial politics. The left can’t handle it because their power model collapses without the division. Fun fact for the woke warriors clutching their pearls in the replies: The Constitution is colorblind by design. It doesn’t care about your feelings, your “disparate impact” spreadsheets, or your need for perpetual victim status to stay relevant. Real equality means one set of rules for all — no reverse-racism exceptions, no matter how loudly you cry “systemic!” Cry harder, identity-politics vampires. The adults in the robe just reminded everyone why we have a Constitution: to protect US from YOU.🫵🏼 America moves forward when we judge ballots by content of character, not color of district. Deal with it.🔥🇺🇸

There is no argument for racial voting districts that isn’t an argument for ethno-nationalism. “Black voters have concerns and interests so totally distinct from those of White voters that if they can’t have special racial districts, they’re basically unrepresented.” On that account, we have nothing in common at best and at worst have mutually hostile interests. So we shouldn’t live under the same government.

Dems will write into law they they get to force the creation of ethnic districts that only they can win, open the borders and push for amnesty to replace the voters, and order the creation of false intelligence to manipulate elections then complain that you're rigging democracy