Zaddy

2.3K posts

Zaddy

Zaddy

@ZaddyYesZaddy

PHL/DE/NJ/NYC Katılım Mart 2022
458 Takip Edilen124 Takipçiler
Zaddy retweetledi
Mrs. Butters 🥧
Mrs. Butters 🥧@MrsButters·
I want nothing but bad things to happen to these chodes
English
202
1.1K
6.5K
60.1K
Brian Allen
Brian Allen@allenanalysis·
🚨THIS IS CRIMINAL!! A DOGE lead just testified under oath that he emailed classified government documents to his personal device and then sent them over Signal. Under oath. This is not a leak. This is not a whistleblower. This is a deposition. Signal auto-deletes messages. Personal devices have no government security protocols. This is textbook mishandling of federal records — the same thing they spent four years prosecuting Hillary Clinton over. The same DOGE that accessed Social Security databases. The same DOGE that accessed Treasury payment systems. The same DOGE that accessed Pentagon personnel files. Emailing government documents to a personal device and routing them through an encrypted auto-deleting app is not a mistake. That is a method. The question is who was on the other end of those Signal messages.
English
1.2K
11.4K
32.7K
2M
Zaddy retweetledi
Willie Ross Jr. Knee Deep
Willie Ross Jr. Knee Deep@RossKneeDeep·
Have seen any of the young twenty year old who work for DOGE being questioned by Congress? They asked one kid what DEI was and he said he'd have to refer to his EO (executive order) memo. He couldn't answer what it was on his own. These kids (all under 25) were firing people with the basic premise that the people they were firing were, Black, Latino, Asian, Indian, Muslim or women. Anything except white, American men.
Willie Ross Jr. Knee Deep tweet media
English
280
2.8K
6K
92.7K
Zaddy retweetledi
Marc²
Marc²@M5squared·
OMG this guy did not have counsel sitting next to him. If true, hemay have just admitted to: 18 U.S.C. § 1924 unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents 18 U.S.C. § 793 mishandling or transmission of national defense information 18 U.S.C. § 2071 concealment removal or destruction of federal records 18 U.S.C. § 641 conversion of government property or records 5 U.S.C. § 552a unlawful disclosure of protected personal information under the Privacy Act 18 U.S.C. § 1519 obstruction of a federal investigation 18 U.S.C. § 1001 false statements or perjury under oath 3-10 years in prison and 20 years possible - he just admitted to
Brian Allen@allenanalysis

🚨THIS IS CRIMINAL!! A DOGE lead just testified under oath that he emailed classified government documents to his personal device and then sent them over Signal. Under oath. This is not a leak. This is not a whistleblower. This is a deposition. Signal auto-deletes messages. Personal devices have no government security protocols. This is textbook mishandling of federal records — the same thing they spent four years prosecuting Hillary Clinton over. The same DOGE that accessed Social Security databases. The same DOGE that accessed Treasury payment systems. The same DOGE that accessed Pentagon personnel files. Emailing government documents to a personal device and routing them through an encrypted auto-deleting app is not a mistake. That is a method. The question is who was on the other end of those Signal messages.

English
383
3.5K
11.3K
386.4K
Zaddy retweetledi
Ben Crump
Ben Crump@AttorneyCrump·
A DOGE staffer tasked with flagging grants for “DEI” struggled to define the term during a deposition, after documents reportedly revealed that DOGE staff canceled 97% of National Endowment for the Humanities grants in just 22 days. This is incredibly disturbing. WHY are decisions affecting education and culture being made without what appears to be a full understanding of DEI?! 🎥: American Historical Association
English
189
1.6K
4K
138.4K
Zaddy retweetledi
Occupy Democrats
Occupy Democrats@OccupyDemocrats·
Says it all! They ALL need to be jailed for this!
Occupy Democrats tweet media
English
222
3.2K
6.6K
57.6K
Zaddy retweetledi
Brian Allen
Brian Allen@allenanalysis·
OMG, SHUT DOWN DOGE: A DOGE official in his 20s testified today that he canceled federal research grants based on personal judgment. No peer review. No subject matter expertise. No formal process. Just him. And books he had read. He flagged a grant studying HIV in prisons during the Reagan and Clinton era — decades of academic research — as “one of the craziest” because it mentioned LGBTQ in the description. He flagged a grant examining the military service experiences of Black, Native American, female, and immigrant veterans as crazy. His qualification for making these calls: “A person can have enough judgment from reading books.” He was then asked if he regretted cutting programs that may have led to people dying. “No.” Did DOGE reduce the deficit? “No.” A person in their 20s. Reading books. Canceling peer-reviewed academic research. Deciding what knowledge the American government is allowed to fund. No experience. No regret. No results. Under oath.
English
3.1K
11.2K
29.4K
1.4M

Keşfet

@GeauxGabrielle @allenanalysis @elonmusk @BarackObama @taylorswift13 @cristiano @BillGates @NASA