
ric zameron
5.6K posts

ric zameron
@ZameronRic
Just a Canadian punk navigating through the haze . An extremely high I Q . Now I just have to learn how to spell .





Journalism empowers us with the truth and protects our democracy. In a world where it’s increasingly under threat, Canada continues to support a free and open press — and we are stronger for it. #WorldPressFreedomDay

**Has the decade-long Liberal media protection racket finally cracked?** Even CBC is now admitting truths they buried for years about the Liberals and Carney. **Unheard of.** Where have you all been, Andrew Coyne and the rest of the media crowd? Asleep at the wheel the entire decade while propping them up non-stop? Now you’re suddenly “recognizing what’s going on”? How convenient. Canadians have been screaming this for years. Why the sudden honesty now?



Canada’s Chief Justice Richard Wagner has installed a lifelike bronze bust of himself in our highest court. It should be called ‘Narcissus Canadiannus” - There is no precedent for something this vulgar in the history of the Court. It should be taken down. Richard fancies himself. - Richard also fancies his own opinion on things. He violated legal due process and the Courts reputation by publicly accusing the Convoy - who protested backwards federal Covid policies that were soon dropped of ‘anarchy’ and ‘hostage taking’. Now that the Convoys freedom of speech, assembly and due process rights have been asserted by lower courts the Supreme Court has to consider the appeal of the federal govt and weigh the rights of citizens against the decision of the federal government to impose the Emergencies Act to suspend those rights. Wagners lack of judicial discretion in the first instance makes his recusal from such an important rights-defining case important because it signals not just fairness in the content of the decision but in the way the decision gets reached by the highest Court. He has already shown his bias. Any decision against the convoy poisons the integrity of the Court if he remains present. But Richard - the man with the bust of himself in our Court - doesn’t imagine himself under the law he imposes on others. He hasn’t completed any graduate work in law or published any academic work in law, philosophy or jurisprudence so it’s hard to know how he justifies himself in these matters. Ironically, he has a reputation for warning others - including those far more qualified in formal jurisprudence than he is - not to critique Canadian judges like himself or their (increasingly bizarre and politicized) decisions. But, from the Magna Carta onwards, Richard should know that in law as in politics dissent is democracy. The dissent of the Convoy and the growing critique of Richards own bizarre behaviour and inability to articulate a judicial philosophy is exactly what’s needed to save Canada - and the Court’s reputation as a place where justice - not the ego of the Justices - is at stake. Richard should recuse himself. And remove that vulgar bust from the Supreme Court. #SCC #RuleOfLaw



Je suis à Erevan, en Arménie, pour le 8e Sommet de la Communauté politique européenne. C’est la première fois qu’un pays non européen y participe. Le Canada collabore avec ses partenaires aux valeurs communes pour offrir certitude, sécurité et prospérité à nos populations.




I had to speak out. The Liberals have done something unprecedented in Canadian history. Seizing a majority not through an election, but through backroom deals, floor crossings & who knows what else. My speech on the Liberal power grab and what it means for our democracy.




A petition was filed yesterday asking for the removal of the Leader of the Official Opposition from Stornoway. ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/P…

BREAKING Liberals have reportedly blocked debate at Health and other committees, imposing a 30-year restriction on public discussion of those meetings. This follows a series of new scandals after the Liberals secured a majority through Conservative and NDP floor crossovers.





Chief Justice Richard Wagner is refusing to recuse himself from the Emergencies Act case, despite previously calling the Freedom Convoy the “start of anarchy” and saying protesters “took citizens hostage.” He has clearly shown his bias. Now he says there’s “no reasonable apprehension of bias.” That’s a problem. You don’t publicly characterize one side in those terms, then turn around and sit in judgment over them. This isn’t about whether he believes he’s impartial, it’s whether a reasonable person would. Do you or I believe him to be unbiased with everything we currently know? From his comments I don't see him as unbiased on this matter. When the Chief Justice has already framed the conduct as “anarchy,” the answer isn’t complicated. It's a given. Even Mahmud Jamal stepped aside in another case to avoid becoming a distraction, not because he had to, but because public confidence matters. That’s the standard. This isn’t just about one case, it’s about whether the public believes the process is fair. Because once that’s gone, the ruling doesn’t matter. No one will believe his "findings." And we currently have a government that are happy to ignore 'bias' in their favour if it adds momentum to their current goals. #onpoli #cdnpoli


Pierre Poilievre: "I got into politics and helped the previous Conservative government balance budgets, drop crime by 25%, lower taxes so people could afford their lives. Those were great days."

I'll never forgive Canadians for electing this idiot....3 times. It was like watching a sparrow slam itself into a window over and over. Historians will look back on this time and call it the retarded ages.




