
the warrior is my name
5.1K posts










@Pragmatislam Yes, according to Sunni beliefs: 🔹Issa (as) will be the last Prophet present on Earth. 🔹Rasool Allah (saw) is the second last Prophet to be present on Earth. ⬇️

@BenZeisloft Breaking News....🚨 Jesus Christ died a natural death in old age 2000 years ago His tomb 👇








“Divine Wisdom vs. Human Speculation: Why the Prophet (s) Did Not Pre-Emptively Divorce Aisha and Hafsa Despite Knowing About Their Future Fitnah” [Note: The replies provide more depth, so read them as well to grasp the whole picture] One of the most commonly parroted sunni claims to "prove" the righteousness of aisha is the notion that if she were truly evil or bound for rebellion, the Prophet (s) would have divorced her. They argue that her remaining in the Prophet’s household is itself a seal of approval on her character. But this reasoning collapses the moment you examine it against the quran, prophetic precedent, and even their own narrations. RasoolAllah (s) did not marry, divorce, or keep wives on the basis of human guesswork about some hypothetical future. He (s) was bound to do the will of Allah, to implement divine wisdom, and to act in ways that served the ummah’s guidance and stability. The quran makes that principle plain: the Prophet’s (s) actions were governed by Allah’s commands and purposes, not by ad hoc personal whims. The verse that answers this directly is the one about zayd, when a private situation became a public law, Allah instructed the Prophet (s) in how to proceed, the Prophet did it because Allah told him so and the quran even says there is no blame on the Messenger (s) for that which Allah has ordained for him. That basic fact alone kills the suggestion that the Prophet (s) should have "pre-emptively" divorced someone because of a future political quarrel. Beyond divine command, there is a deeper moral and logical objection to the demand behind the question. To ask "why didn’t the Prophet divorce aisha or hafsa knowing they’d cause fitnah" is to demand pre-punishment for crimes that haven’t happened. That’s unjust and absurd. Would you tell Allah to have annihilated iblis before he disobeyed? quran explicitly records iblis’s rebellion, Allah created, He knew, and yet the test and trial of mankind unfolded. If you insist a Prophet (s) must dismantle social ties because of possible futures, you are insisting he govern by clairvoyance rather than by justice and wisdom. No scriptural or moral system supports punishing people for what they might do. Also, some marriages were commanded or permitted by Allah to clarify legal rulings and to break harmful social taboos (see the zayd–zaynab episode). Some were to maintain social ties, to provide for widows of the community, to establish exemplars and transmit knowledge to the ummah. But in the case of aisha and hafsa, their role was not to elevate them spiritually but to serve as a test (fitnah) for the ummah. Allah willed that the people be sifted: will they follow a self-proclaimed "mother of the believers" who later defied Allah’s command: And stay in your houses and do not display your finery like the displaying of the Pre-Islamic period before; and establish the Salat and give the Zakat, and obey Allah and His Rasool [33:33] (sunnah.com/bukhari:7083) or will they remain loyal to the successor whom the Prophet (s) explicitly declared - "War against Ali is war against me"? sunnah.com/tirmidhi:3870 sunnah.com/ibnmajah:145 (Read here below regarding more details for verse 33:33 and the exclusion of the wives for the latter part) x.com/Shiahadithdail… This is not speculation; even sunni sources record it. In their inerrent bukhari, ammar bin yasir delivered a sermon in kufa during the fitnah of jamal, saying: “Aisha has moved to Basra. By Allah! She is the wife of your Prophet in this world and in the Hereafter. But Allah has put you to test whether you obey Him or her.” sunnah.com/bukhari:7100 So her rebellion was itself a divine test, exposing the hypocrites who sided against the Imam (a) and the true believers who upheld the Prophet’s (s) covenant. Not only that, but bukhari himself records narrations where the Prophet (s) foretold the coming of a fitnah linked to aisha. (continued below)

























