the warrior is my name

5.1K posts

the warrior is my name

the warrior is my name

@ZebiHeating

Katılım Eylül 2022
54 Takip Edilen47 Takipçiler
SIZWE-BANSI
SIZWE-BANSI@SizweBansii·
🚨Sam Shamoun-: Muslim ATTACKS Paul & IMMEDIATELY REGRETS IT You can’t defend Islam ☪️ and not sound dumb and stupid ! 🤦🏻
English
34
308
1K
20.9K
HENK
HENK@CHUPALECHY·
@realMaalouf Islam is the most hypocrite of them all!!!!
HENK tweet media
English
1
3
67
7.3K
Dr. Maalouf ‏
Dr. Maalouf ‏@realMaalouf·
He forces all the women in his family to cover up from head to toe, while he shamelessly looks at naked women online. This is what hypocrisy looks like.
English
1.1K
19.1K
96.1K
2.9M
the warrior is my name
the warrior is my name@ZebiHeating·
@realMaalouf Dr goof I ment maalouf forgot that his own ppl those so called zios are under epstine file. But he wouldn’t wanna touch that cuz it will hurt his masters
English
0
0
0
17
Faraz Pervaiz
Faraz Pervaiz@FarazPervaiz3·
Muhammad is 58 She is 7 She probably doesn't even know what's happening to her. This is Islam.
English
35
101
186
4K
Dr. Maalouf ‏
Dr. Maalouf ‏@realMaalouf·
Muslim woman in America is very angry and has a message to Americans. What is your response?
English
4K
415
1.4K
80.3K
the warrior is my name
the warrior is my name@ZebiHeating·
@SultanAChoudhr1 Was isa born before prophet Muhammad or after ? If all students are in the class. One goes out of th room to drink water and comes back he’s not the last one to enter the class as he was already in the class. he just went to drink water. It just take alittle brain cells to get it
English
0
0
0
5
Sultan A Choudhry
Sultan A Choudhry@SultanAChoudhr1·
People usually fail to rationalize and understand Sunni beliefs: The presence of issa (as) as the last Prophet on Earth does not negate the finality of the second-last Prophet present on Earth i.e. Rasool Allah (saw). 🧠
Sultan A Choudhry@SultanAChoudhr1

@Pragmatislam Yes, according to Sunni beliefs: 🔹Issa (as) will be the last Prophet present on Earth. 🔹Rasool Allah (saw) is the second last Prophet to be present on Earth. ⬇️

English
6
4
35
1.2K
فیصی
فیصی@iamfaisee·
How to spot a qadyani account without him saying one word. 😎 Ps. I have my personal copy of Jesus in heaven on earth.
Sultan A Choudhry@SultanAChoudhr1

@BenZeisloft Breaking News....🚨 Jesus Christ died a natural death in old age 2000 years ago His tomb 👇

English
2
2
6
1.5K
the warrior is my name
the warrior is my name@ZebiHeating·
@Victoria00025 So epstine fill should be hidden and kick Muslims out cuz they r against epstine files. Now I get it why Islam is not compatible with USA.
English
0
0
1
34
Victoria
Victoria@Victoria00025·
Do you agree? 👇
Victoria tweet media
English
2.5K
2.1K
17.9K
157.7K
Imtiaz Mahmood
Imtiaz Mahmood@ImtiazMadmood·
“If a girl gets raped… who’s to blame? The girl, of course. She’s the one at fault.” - @GAZAWOOD1
English
390
1.1K
2K
81.6K
the warrior is my name
the warrior is my name@ZebiHeating·
@Shiahadithdaily @libanahmedX Cuz u can’t Mary ur mothers. That’s why Quran calls them mother of the believers. If Allah wanted to say u can’t Mary then he would have clearly say in simple other words. But he used the most believed word that is mother. Now die slapping ur face
English
0
0
0
11
Shia defence
Shia defence@Shiahadithdaily·
Shia defence@Shiahadithdaily

Quran [33:6] calls the wives of the Prophet (s) the 'mothers of the believers' and at first glance, some take this as a spiritual title, but when we read the verse in context it becomes clear that it is a legal designation, not a mystical one. the passage is dealing with laws of family, adoption, and marital restrictions. It abolishes the pre-Islamic practice of tabanni (adopted sonship) and clarifies the Prophet’s unique status in relation to the believers. Immediately after this Allah says the Prophet’s wives are their mothers, meaning simply that marriage with them is prohibited, just like with one’s own biological mother. Another verse confirms this when Allah says in ]33:53] that it is forbidden for anyone to marry the wives of the Prophet after him. This explicit ruling shows what the "motherhood" title actually entails: the hurmah of marriage. If it were about spirituality, the quran would have framed it differently, perhaps in terms of obedience, emulation, or sanctity. Instead, the direct consequence spelled out is legal prohibition. If the wives were truly mothers in every sense, then believers would inherit from them as from biological mothers. But they did not. If they were actual mothers, they would be permanent mahrams, and women could have unveiled in front of them. That too was not the case which proves the quran used "mother" metaphorically for one legal function only, not as a broad relational or spiritual elevation. Further, the quran itself warns and reprimands some of the wives. Surah al tahrim addresses aisha and hafsa directly, telling them to repent, and even threatens that the Prophet (s) could be given wives better than them, believing, devout, and repentant. If being "mothers of the believers" automatically implied spiritual greatness, such warnings would be nonsensical. The quran would not threaten spiritual role models with replacementHistory makes this even clearer, ome of the wives, such as aisha, later played a central role in political strife, even raising arms against the Imam of her time, Imam Ali (a). If the motherhood title meant spiritual purity, how could she commit such a grave opposition? The reality of their actions demonstrates that the quran never meant it as a stamp of sanctity. Also, quran often uses familial terms metaphorically to establish social or legal frameworks. Believers are called "brothers" in faith, but this does not mean they are literal brothers in lineage. Before the abrogation of adoption laws, adopted sons were treated as biological sons. Likewise, the Prophet’s wives were called mothers only to enforce the prohibition of marriage, not to imply sainthood or spiritual superiority. So the real meaning of "mothers of the believers" is very specific: it protects the Prophet’s honor and dignity by ensuring no one could marry his wives after him, preserving their status in society. It was never meant as a spiritual pedestal, because neither the quran nor the sunnah treats it as such.

QME
2
0
2
262
Liban Ahmed
Liban Ahmed@libanahmedX·
Dirty Shia celebrate the death of our Prophet’s Wife, and the Mother of the Believers (Aisha). They make fake images of her and then shoot the images. They Curse Aisha. Watch how they teach this filth to their children.
English
29
63
291
7.1K
Shia defence
Shia defence@Shiahadithdaily·
Shia defence@Shiahadithdaily

“Divine Wisdom vs. Human Speculation: Why the Prophet (s) Did Not Pre-Emptively Divorce Aisha and Hafsa Despite Knowing About Their Future Fitnah” [Note: The replies provide more depth, so read them as well to grasp the whole picture] One of the most commonly parroted sunni claims to "prove" the righteousness of aisha is the notion that if she were truly evil or bound for rebellion, the Prophet (s) would have divorced her. They argue that her remaining in the Prophet’s household is itself a seal of approval on her character. But this reasoning collapses the moment you examine it against the quran, prophetic precedent, and even their own narrations. RasoolAllah (s) did not marry, divorce, or keep wives on the basis of human guesswork about some hypothetical future. He (s) was bound to do the will of Allah, to implement divine wisdom, and to act in ways that served the ummah’s guidance and stability. The quran makes that principle plain: the Prophet’s (s) actions were governed by Allah’s commands and purposes, not by ad hoc personal whims. The verse that answers this directly is the one about zayd, when a private situation became a public law, Allah instructed the Prophet (s) in how to proceed, the Prophet did it because Allah told him so and the quran even says there is no blame on the Messenger (s) for that which Allah has ordained for him. That basic fact alone kills the suggestion that the Prophet (s) should have "pre-emptively" divorced someone because of a future political quarrel. Beyond divine command, there is a deeper moral and logical objection to the demand behind the question. To ask "why didn’t the Prophet divorce aisha or hafsa knowing they’d cause fitnah" is to demand pre-punishment for crimes that haven’t happened. That’s unjust and absurd. Would you tell Allah to have annihilated iblis before he disobeyed? quran explicitly records iblis’s rebellion, Allah created, He knew, and yet the test and trial of mankind unfolded. If you insist a Prophet (s) must dismantle social ties because of possible futures, you are insisting he govern by clairvoyance rather than by justice and wisdom. No scriptural or moral system supports punishing people for what they might do. Also, some marriages were commanded or permitted by Allah to clarify legal rulings and to break harmful social taboos (see the zayd–zaynab episode). Some were to maintain social ties, to provide for widows of the community, to establish exemplars and transmit knowledge to the ummah. But in the case of aisha and hafsa, their role was not to elevate them spiritually but to serve as a test (fitnah) for the ummah. Allah willed that the people be sifted: will they follow a self-proclaimed "mother of the believers" who later defied Allah’s command: And stay in your houses and do not display your finery like the displaying of the Pre-Islamic period before; and establish the Salat and give the Zakat, and obey Allah and His Rasool [33:33] (sunnah.com/bukhari:7083) or will they remain loyal to the successor whom the Prophet (s) explicitly declared - "War against Ali is war against me"? sunnah.com/tirmidhi:3870 sunnah.com/ibnmajah:145 (Read here below regarding more details for verse 33:33 and the exclusion of the wives for the latter part) x.com/Shiahadithdail… This is not speculation; even sunni sources record it. In their inerrent bukhari, ammar bin yasir delivered a sermon in kufa during the fitnah of jamal, saying: “Aisha has moved to Basra. By Allah! She is the wife of your Prophet in this world and in the Hereafter. But Allah has put you to test whether you obey Him or her.” sunnah.com/bukhari:7100 So her rebellion was itself a divine test, exposing the hypocrites who sided against the Imam (a) and the true believers who upheld the Prophet’s (s) covenant. Not only that, but bukhari himself records narrations where the Prophet (s) foretold the coming of a fitnah linked to aisha. (continued below)

QME
1
0
2
243
Sultan A Choudhry
Sultan A Choudhry@SultanAChoudhr1·
@bmjvermerlleey Presence of Prophets on Earth 🌎 According to Sunni Beliefs. _______The Timeline From the First to the Last Prophet
Sultan A Choudhry tweet media
English
8
13
79
8.6K
vermerlleey
vermerlleey@bmjvermerlleey·
Prophets of Allah mentioned in the Qur'an...!!!
vermerlleey tweet media
English
89
752
6.3K
259.4K
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra·
There's nigh on 3000 mosques in Germany, but they want to wail out their evil noises in your churches. Just like they do in the UK. It's called being conquered. Stop allowing it.
English
733
4K
18.9K
215.2K