Andrew Cattermole

420 posts

Andrew Cattermole banner
Andrew Cattermole

Andrew Cattermole

@Zenandy1962

Retired Australian Electrician. Doncaster Rovers supporter.

Albany, Western Australia Katılım Şubat 2026
208 Takip Edilen108 Takipçiler
Andrew Cattermole retweetledi
Zoom Afrika
Zoom Afrika@zoomafrika1·
“The people that built their heaven on your land are telling you yours is in the sky" ~ Nina Simone
Zoom Afrika tweet media
English
94
4.5K
16.1K
160K
Andrew Cattermole
Andrew Cattermole@Zenandy1962·
@_Jase_C_ @aus_pill The frightening part of this is that no one is saying he’s innocent, they just don’t care that he murdered people.
English
1
0
1
11
Jase
Jase@_Jase_C_·
@aus_pill A heroic man who murdered civilians for fun... Who had 21 of his military mates make statements against him. Those 21 are the heroes..... He's just a murderer
English
1
0
13
61
Andrew Cattermole
Andrew Cattermole@Zenandy1962·
Janet reckons I’m a freeloader because I’m a retired electrician. She came to this conclusion because I hate Israel and Zionism. It’s better than being a crap painter and being all pretentious about it.
Andrew Cattermole tweet media
English
0
0
0
17
Dr David Adler
Dr David Adler@DrDavidAdler1·
SO SAD... GRACE TAME FOUNDATION TO CLOSE Perhaps calling for the mass murder of Jews by repeatedly screeching "globalise the intifada" has discouraged donors. Maybe inciting jihadist terrorism in Australia is not widely supported. abc.net.au/news/2026-04-0…
English
127
27
201
12.8K
misosoop
misosoop@misosoop511·
@Zenandy1962 @SocialistMMA Big difference between "acknowledged" and "recognized." Almost every country does not recognize the One China policy where it matters.
English
1
0
1
24
Nick Cruse 🥋
Nick Cruse 🥋@SocialistMMA·
I’ve said for years now that China would reunify with Taiwan without firing a bullet This is a massive geopolitical defeat for the United States Trump collecting L after L
English
94
922
6.7K
144K
misosoop
misosoop@misosoop511·
@SocialistMMA China is too chicken shit to do that. Which is the reason why Taiwan has been free for 76 years.
GIF
English
3
0
5
409
Andrew Cattermole
Andrew Cattermole@Zenandy1962·
@RobertJenrick A lot of people on UC already have jobs but don’t get paid enough. Why deny them the opportunity of a nice day out. You’re a fucking wanker .
English
0
0
1
307
Robert Jenrick
Robert Jenrick@RobertJenrick·
Many of these museums - like London Zoo - are public institutions. Their management shouldn’t be charging working people more, to give discounts to those on benefits. And the prices they charge are already ridiculously high for most families. They should be finding ways to cut the cost for everyone.
English
191
42
566
68.8K
Andrew Cattermole retweetledi
Iranian Force
Iranian Force@MrImranPk·
Retweet if you believe Netanyahu is a war criminal.
Iranian Force tweet media
English
848
45.3K
69.5K
579.4K
Andrew Cattermole retweetledi
TheRealThelmaJohnson
TheRealThelmaJohnson@TheRealThelmaJ1·
This sexy bitch was waiting for J.D. Vance in his hotel room in Budapest
TheRealThelmaJohnson tweet media
English
498
938
5.5K
61.6K
Nate John 🇦🇺
Nate John 🇦🇺@nate_nugent·
The tweet you posted regarding the photographed beheading of uniformed Australian POW Leonard Siffleet (a clear war crime in symmetrical interstate war with clear visual evidence) with Ben Roberts-Smith’s alleged 2012 kicking and shooting of handcuffed Afghan farmer Ali Jan during asymmetrical SAS counter-insurgency operations is a false equivalency. Key mismatches are conflict type (conventional front-line capture vs blurred combatant lines in guerrilla raids), evidence quality (immediate photo vs contested years-later SAS eyewitness accounts) and scrutiny (historical atrocity vs Federal Court findings on civil “balance of probabilities” per the Brereton Inquiry). The core legal rule of no killing persons under control remains identical, but the direct analogy ignores these operational and evidentiary aspects. Then there’s other logical fallacies- The tweet misrepresents the position of BRS defenders as “argue BRS should not be tried” because they believe killing handcuffed detainees is acceptable and would therefore “stand with” a Japanese war criminal. This is a classic straw man: attacking a weaker, distorted version of the opposing view instead of engaging the actual claims about evidence and context. BRS’s case has always centred around denying the assertions and challenging the credibility of SAS eyewitnesses, not on arguing that summary execution of detainees is lawful. Understandably, Appeal to Emotion accompanied with a loaded question. The trigger warning plus the beheading photo is designed to generate outrage and moral revulsion, then it’s immediately used to equate it with the BRS situation. The rhetorical question “Would those who argue BRS should not be tried have said, ‘I stand with Yasuno Chikao’?” is a loaded question that presumes the answer and forces a false moral binary. It’s a play on emotion rather than inviting examination of the specific evidence, rules of engagement, or differing standards of proof between a documented war crime and modern special-forces allegations decades later. The False Dichotomy argument presents only two choices: support criminal trial of BRS and reject the Japanese officer or oppose trial and therefore stand with a proven war criminal. This ignores other legitimate positions, such as: Believing the allegations require full criminal proof beyond reasonable doubt, not just the civil “balance of probabilities” standard used in the defamation case. Supporting due process but believing the eyewitness testimony has inconsistencies that were weighed differently on appeal and these appeal proceedings explicitly address these evidentiary disputes, showing the issues are not binary. There are evidentiary inconsistencies where proof standards differ sharply. The Siffleet execution had contemporaneous photographic evidence plus multiple witnesses it was treated as a clear war crime by Australia. The BRS allegations rely primarily on later eyewitness accounts from fellow SAS members in the defamation proceedings. The IGADF Afghanistan Inquiry (Brereton Report, public release) and subsequent Federal Court findings accepted some of these accounts on the balance of probabilities, but the criminal process Office of the Special Investigator applies the higher “beyond reasonable doubt” standard, and appeals have highlighted credibility and inconsistency issues. To quote a tweet from earlier this evening - The Roberts-Smith allegations are 20 years old. And here’s what the Brereton Inquiry, for all its 510 witnesses & four years of work, could never get: No crime scene access. The Taliban didn’t let investigators into Uruzgan. No Afghan witnesses interviewed. No secured scene. No blood-spatter analysis. No DNA No autopsies. No recovered bodies. No weapons tied to victims. The investigators themselves admitted they “lacked access to Afghan crime scenes and were missing the physical evidence that would normally anchor a murder prosecution.” So, what’s left? Memory. Twenty-year-old memory from men in the fog of war. The science is unambiguous. Countless research studies confirm memory is reconstructive: later suggestion, media exposure, and repeated questioning distort it. This is the textbook misinformation effect. Confidence and accuracy decouple within months, let alone decades. Studies on soldiers who suffer PTSD show the gaps get even larger. If murder can be proven without hard evidence decades later. That isn’t justice even if he is guilty. Proof of guilt matters. That’s a Marxist humiliation ceremony leading to national strategic disarmament by lawfare. -John Konrad The 20 plus SAS current and former soldier also questioned their involvement in the case and disagreed with it in principle but gave evidence. This legal process is going to run its course, and the results and ramifications will be apparent despite how we may feel about it.
English
20
1
13
1.5K
Peter Fox 🦊
Peter Fox 🦊@Peter_Fox59·
TRIGGER WARNING In 1943 Japanese officer Chikao beheaded Australian POW Leonard Siffleet. Australia demanded justice for this war crime. BRS is charged with killing a handcuffed Afghan POW. Would those who argue BRS should not be tried have said, 'I stand with Yasuno Chikao'?
Peter Fox 🦊 tweet media
English
205
558
2.8K
99.5K
Andrew Cattermole
Andrew Cattermole@Zenandy1962·
@jboyded @VGreg82063 @JmarrMarr He went to Kwinana Senior High School. Same one as me . Very working class suburb. I think his father was in management at the Kwinana BP oil refinery.
English
0
0
1
34
💧Elizabeth Marr
💧Elizabeth Marr@JmarrMarr·
Again I admire the patience & restraint of our Labor Gov MP’s. Many people would have returned the disrespect he showed & called out his LIES. I wonder if he’s mates with Chris Uhlmann same views same anger?
stranger@strangerous10

Chris Bowen slams angry Anti-Renewables journalist Liam Bartlett for abusive comments & for claiming “I’ve had to chase you down.” Bowen: “You’ve come to a press conference, congratulations.”🔥 “Other journalists have been to every press conference I’ve held.” #auspol

English
42
62
294
5K
Boy George
Boy George@BoyGeorge·
It's very trendy to hate Isreal but I have always said 'fashion for the fragile, style for the brave'.
Boy George tweet media
English
887
671
5.7K
397.9K
Menachem Vorchheimer
Menachem Vorchheimer@MenachemV·
Is @MichaelWestBiz so obsessed that he can’t understand that a person purposely going to Bondi beach - the site of Australia’s worst terrorist attack - wearing a t-shirt that arguably glorifies the hateful ideology that drove the Bondi terrorists, is morally reprehensible ???
Menachem Vorchheimer@MenachemV

Beyond tone-deaf At the site of Australia’s worst terrorist attack - driven by anti-Zionist ideology - a known agitator shows up in a “Fuck Zionists” t-shirt And yet some like @MichaelWestBiz seemingly defend this @dailytelegraph @smh @australian @2GB873 @ChrisMinnsMP @abcnews

English
70
13
63
15.8K