ZeroDeus

1.4K posts

ZeroDeus banner
ZeroDeus

ZeroDeus

@ZeroDeusExploit

Goldpilled nukemaxxing freedomcel. K'oyashi mav ra k'ash'amu.

Katılım Ağustos 2024
283 Takip Edilen47 Takipçiler
SovCorp CEO🇱🇮🐍
@liquid2ulu False. Deli meats raise your risk of colorectal cancer from 5% to 6%. Smoking raises your risk of lung cancer from 1% to 24%. They aren’t even comparable, really. A pack of Marlboro a day keeps your doctor in pay. And also your oncologist.
English
2
0
0
100
LiquidZulu, most consistent mofo you know
Just makes it look like cigarettes aren't really a big deal.
Science girl@sciencegirl

Processed meats have officially been classified as Group 1 carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, placing them in the same category as tobacco and asbestos in terms of the strength of scientific evidence linking them to cancer. Foods such as bacon, ham, hot dogs, and sausages have been strongly associated with colorectal cancer. Researchers say the risk is largely connected to the way these meats are processed. Methods like curing, smoking, and salting can create harmful compounds including nitrosamines, which may damage DNA over time. Preservatives such as nitrates and nitrites, along with high temperature cooking methods like grilling or frying, can also increase the formation of carcinogenic chemicals. Health experts stress that this does not mean eating a slice of bacon carries the same overall danger as smoking cigarettes, but it does mean the evidence that processed meat can cause cancer is considered conclusive. Many specialists recommend reducing intake of processed meats and choosing alternatives such as fish, beans, or other plant based proteins more often. For people who continue eating red or processed meat, cutting back on portion size and frequency may help lower long term cancer risk and support overall health and longevity. Source: International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs evaluate consumption of red meat and processed meat. World Health Organization.

English
3
0
67
1.4K
ZeroDeus
ZeroDeus@ZeroDeusExploit·
@PanPotaderNader @Anarchy_Wear Anarchism does not mean no authority, it means a choice of whether to associate with a given authority or not; which allows market pressures to select for the best authorities instead of the dysgenic retardation of forced association.
English
0
0
0
5
Pan
Pan@PanPotaderNader·
@Anarchy_Wear Anarchism as a whole is just an ideology where the weak seek sollace in the empty fictional void of an authorityless society, where they continue to imagine their pipe dreams, and never actually achieve them, because the strong naturally overcome the weak, and create authority.
English
1
0
0
53
ZeroDeus
ZeroDeus@ZeroDeusExploit·
@justalexoki For me, I was raised left-leaning, in a very left-leaning area. It was the unexamined default. Then GamerGate happened and I found myself (I believed) temporarily aligned with them, heard them out for the first time, and it made way more sense.
English
0
0
0
77
taoki
taoki@justalexoki·
looking back these results were actually kind of crazy. how or why did so many turn from the left to the right?
taoki tweet media
English
234
6
479
183.1K
ZeroDeus
ZeroDeus@ZeroDeusExploit·
@thatweirdfurry2 @Grxit Of course. If I had to, say, save a busfull of immigrants or a busfull of Americans, I'd save the Americans. But a socialized border HURTS Americans. And so do the laws I'm advocating we dismantle.
English
1
0
0
4
ꓕNIOԀꓤƎ⅁⅁Iꓤꓕ
Reminder that a giant portion of Massie’s backers and donors were exposed as Pakistani nationals
Zack@Asmongold

@alexbruesewitz They do, but it's diluted across the whole world When you have American infuencers getting gassed up by third worlders on social media, a false consensus is made Your tweets about American politics may have a lot of likes, but it doesn't matter if those likes are from India

English
21
49
1.2K
17.5K
ZeroDeus
ZeroDeus@ZeroDeusExploit·
@thatweirdfurry2 @Grxit We haven't just "not sunk," we are incredibly prosperous and numerous. Our species' current state would simply not be possible if the average person were a net burden on the rest of us. People are better than your intuition seems to portray them.
English
1
0
0
5
thatweirdfurry
thatweirdfurry@thatweirdfurry2·
@ZeroDeusExploit @Grxit yeah, i'm so happy you have decided it's a fair assessment to lump citizens and immigrants, billionaires and welfare leeches to hand wave any possible insight into "well we haven't sunk yet"
English
1
0
0
7
ZeroDeus
ZeroDeus@ZeroDeusExploit·
@duhrstloescher @AncapPigARLZ There was not a single libertarian in the Epstein files. The only one mentioned was Ron Paul, and it was Epstein going on about how much he hated Ron. The Epstein class is on your side, dumbass.
English
0
0
1
13
ZeroDeus
ZeroDeus@ZeroDeusExploit·
@thatweirdfurry2 @Grxit The average person is a net producer. If that were not true, society would have already collapsed. Housing is another area where the state has regulated the supply dramatically below what it needs to be, while artificially inflating the price.
English
1
0
0
5
thatweirdfurry
thatweirdfurry@thatweirdfurry2·
@ZeroDeusExploit @Grxit so, they can just live here, take home and resources for americans? i thought lolbertarians understood supply and demand, you can't fix one making the labor supply effectively infinite, but we can't get rid of them so the resource demand then goes infinite
English
1
0
0
10
duh
duh@duhrstloescher·
@AncapPigARLZ why would anyone outside of your retarded epstein bubble listen to someone who calls themselves "Capitalist Pig"
English
3
0
0
46
ZeroDeus
ZeroDeus@ZeroDeusExploit·
@thatweirdfurry2 @Grxit the increased supply of labor and decreased regulatory burden would drive prices sharply down. People would have less nominal money but much more purchasing power, which is how the healthiest economies work.
English
0
0
0
6
ZeroDeus
ZeroDeus@ZeroDeusExploit·
@thatweirdfurry2 @Grxit regulations that are slowly killing us. We need to do away with minimum wage and most “worker’s rights” provisions because those impositions are toxic to our growth, even if we did deport all illegal immigrants. This would result in a net increase in prosperity for citizens 2/x
English
1
0
0
7
ZeroDeus
ZeroDeus@ZeroDeusExploit·
@thatweirdfurry2 @Grxit And the second issue is, again, entirely state created. The businesses can only coerce the immigrants because the government will deport them.
English
1
0
0
7
thatweirdfurry
thatweirdfurry@thatweirdfurry2·
@ZeroDeusExploit @Grxit not only do immigrants compete for the same jobs, they will take lesser pay, but further than that, they come with a perk no citizen could ever compete with: an immigrant is uniquely dependent on the the company for their existence in the country, adding a massive coercive lever
English
2
0
0
12
ZeroDeus
ZeroDeus@ZeroDeusExploit·
@thatweirdfurry2 @Grxit In a free market, employers expand to utilize the expanded pool of labor. But regulation essentially renders citizens unable to compete with immigrants, meaning the new supply replaces the old instead of supplementing it.
English
0
0
0
5
ZeroDeus
ZeroDeus@ZeroDeusExploit·
@thatweirdfurry2 @Grxit Immigration is good for the host nation. The problems attributed to it are actually with the government.
English
2
0
0
23
ZeroDeus
ZeroDeus@ZeroDeusExploit·
@KaizokuBalls Am I alone in not having interpreted this as them making fun of anonymity; but just rather talking about their own experiences as never personally having been anonymous? They don't really say anything bad about it.
English
1
0
1
240