Zebraz

6K posts

Zebraz banner
Zebraz

Zebraz

@Zez_Duck

Katılım Haziran 2024
616 Takip Edilen38 Takipçiler
Florian Philippot
Florian Philippot@f_philippot·
Guerre ! ⤵️ Ce jour, évoquant l’Ukraine, Macron vient de déclarer : « La France est prête à défendre la liberté et le droit, au prix du sang s’il le faut ! » Son sang ? Non, celui des jeunes Français qui seront envoyés au massacre là-bas ! Pour une guerre qui n’est pas la nôtre. ➡️ Macron veut la guerre. Il en a besoin. Il doit être arrêté au plus vite.
Florian Philippot tweet media
Français
918
3K
7.1K
100.9K
Autism Capital 🧩
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapital·
"1000 missiles are locked and loaded and aimed at Iran should I be assassinated. Praise be to Allah."
Autism Capital 🧩 tweet media
English
107
70
2.4K
137K
Truthstream Media
Truthstream Media@truthstreamnews·
New Truthstream: The future, says the father of VR, will be based not on money but on "direct behavior modification as a form of power". Now you can see why some call it the beast system. Everything about this technofuedal hellscape is antithetical to the human soul.
English
33
149
415
17.3K
Johnny Vedmore
Johnny Vedmore@JohnnyVedmore·
I have never purposely fomented anarchy or unrest… So, am I really a journalist?
English
5
0
13
1.8K
VERITY France
VERITY France@verity_france·
Jamais nous n’avions eu un président qui n’avait autant rien à foutre de la France. Le seul mot qui vaille pour lui c’est l’Europe.
Français
271
722
2.7K
33.3K
Zebraz
Zebraz@Zez_Duck·
@SaveEuropeAct @D_Tarczynski @EvaVlaar #bastilleday Bastille Day: France holds parade with Ukraine in focus The celebrations features troops and warplanes from around Europe in a show of support for Ukraine, as it fends off Russia's ongoing invasion. It is Emmanuel Macron's last Bastille Day as France's ...
GIF
English
0
0
0
33
Save Europe Act
Save Europe Act@SaveEuropeAct·
🛡️Speaker Announcement: We're delighted to welcome MEP Dominik Tarczyński ( @D_Tarczynski ) as a speaker at our upcoming Save Europe Act event on Wednesday, July 15th at 2:45 PM at Place du Luxembourg in Brussels.
Save Europe Act tweet media
English
13
225
826
20.4K
DR POOL
DR POOL@DRPOOLQ17·
🚨 TERRIFYING: It's gotten so bad in Minnesota that police are saying they are SOMALIANS FIRST. He isn't even speaking English. "We came to this country as refugees. Now that we're hired, we work for our own people [Somalians]." DEPORT!
English
737
5K
13.3K
234.7K
Johnny Vedmore
Johnny Vedmore@JohnnyVedmore·
Dr Frankenstein’s Castle Another relatively unknown high-level actor at the SpaceX/Epstein events was virologist Nathan Wolfe. Wolfe was awarded $40 million in funding, which came from various sources, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; the US Department of Defense, the National Institute of Health, the National Geographic Society, Google.org and the Skoll Foundation. If someone were to inform you that the wealthiest and most powerful supporters of Transhumanism, flanked by the top scientists in the field of genomics, went to a rocket laboratory in the desert to map out the birth of Transhumanism, you would be forgiven for believing it’s the plot of the newest James Bond movie. However, that might not be too far from the truth. After all, in the real world, James Bond looks a lot more like Jeffrey Epstein. The bulk of the course covered developments in Synthetic Genomics, and some of the interactions are totally fascinating. Although, there is also part of the Synthetic Genomic Master Class which has been hidden from history. Session 4 of the Edge event at SpaceX was entitled “Human 2.0” and the video of that part of the seminar has been totally wiped from the record. While searching for this video, I also came across a very comprehensive article by Alexis Baden-Mayer from November 2023 entitled: 21st Century Dr Frankenstein's: George Church. Bayden-Mayer posits many questions about the Edge-funded program in question, George Church’s “Pentagon/CIA-funded work”, and some of the wider links to the pandemic. Ed Regis was at the event and later wrote for the Frankfurter Allgemeine. Regis stated: “The specter of "biohackers" creating new infectious agents made its obligatory appearance, but synthetic genomic researchers are, almost of necessity, optimists. George Church, one of whose special topics was "Engineering Humans 2.0," told the group that "DNA is excellent programmable matter." Just as automated sequencing machines can read the natural order of a DNA molecule, automated DNA synthesizing machines can create stretches of deliberately engineered DNA that can then be placed inside a cell so as to modify its normal behavior.” When we think about the implementation of Transhumanist technology, we tend to think of synthetically made chips or wires poking out of our skulls. However, one facet of Synthetic Genomics is the direct recoding of the cells inside a subject. The most pessimistic view of such meddling is human extinction, whereas the optimistic vision is a tale as old as time, the hunt for eternal life. Talking again about George Church’s desire to alter the fundamental building blocks of humanity, Ed Regis later writes: “George Church had the final say in a lecture entitled "Engineering Humans 2.0." Human beings, he noted, are limited by a variety of things: by their ability to concentrate and remember, by the shortness of their lifespans, and so on. Genomic engineering could be used to correct all these deficiencies and more. The common laboratory mouse, he noted, had an average lifespan of 2.5 years. The naked mole rat, by contrast, lives ten times longer, to the ripe old age of 25. It would be possible to find the genes that contributed to the longevity of the naked mole rat, and by importing those genes into the lab mouse, you could slowly increase its longevity. An analogous process could also be tried on human beings, increasing their lifespans and adding to their memory capacity, but the question was whether it was wise to do this.” John Markoff was also a primary source at the event and produced an article for The New York Times, entitled “Synthetic Life”, where he writes: “For someone who has spent the past three decades writing about computing, Dr. Venter’s talk was eye-opening. “I view DNA as an analog information system,” he said. “and I hope to convince you in fact that it is absolutely the software of life.” While watching the videos of the Epstein-funded SpaceX/Edge Master Class in Synthetic Genomics, most of the high-level scientists involved appear impetuous. The issue with quickly developing dangerous technology is that it creates unexpected risk, and that is acknowledged by the participants. Regardless of the potential risks, most of the high-level players attending this event suggest developing technology as quickly as possible while hoping that we’ll also develop solutions simultaneously. The technologies these people are creating could lead to extinction-level events. It can be assured that the vast majority of society would prefer those in charge to approach extinction-level events carefully, rather than at high speed with their fingers crossed. George Church’s Short Course in Synthetic Genomics has been cited in various academic works, such as: Coping with Complexity in Metabolic Engineering, Xenobiology, and A New Form of Life as the Ultimate Biosafety Tool. Over 15 years have passed, and the technology has advanced significantly. However, not significantly enough to extend Jeffrey Epstein’s life. 🧵6/20
Johnny Vedmore tweet media
English
6
32
76
6.8K
Zebraz
Zebraz@Zez_Duck·
GIF
Johnny Vedmore@JohnnyVedmore

Dr Frankenstein’s Castle Another relatively unknown high-level actor at the SpaceX/Epstein events was virologist Nathan Wolfe. Wolfe was awarded $40 million in funding, which came from various sources, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; the US Department of Defense, the National Institute of Health, the National Geographic Society, Google.org and the Skoll Foundation. If someone were to inform you that the wealthiest and most powerful supporters of Transhumanism, flanked by the top scientists in the field of genomics, went to a rocket laboratory in the desert to map out the birth of Transhumanism, you would be forgiven for believing it’s the plot of the newest James Bond movie. However, that might not be too far from the truth. After all, in the real world, James Bond looks a lot more like Jeffrey Epstein. The bulk of the course covered developments in Synthetic Genomics, and some of the interactions are totally fascinating. Although, there is also part of the Synthetic Genomic Master Class which has been hidden from history. Session 4 of the Edge event at SpaceX was entitled “Human 2.0” and the video of that part of the seminar has been totally wiped from the record. While searching for this video, I also came across a very comprehensive article by Alexis Baden-Mayer from November 2023 entitled: 21st Century Dr Frankenstein's: George Church. Bayden-Mayer posits many questions about the Edge-funded program in question, George Church’s “Pentagon/CIA-funded work”, and some of the wider links to the pandemic. Ed Regis was at the event and later wrote for the Frankfurter Allgemeine. Regis stated: “The specter of "biohackers" creating new infectious agents made its obligatory appearance, but synthetic genomic researchers are, almost of necessity, optimists. George Church, one of whose special topics was "Engineering Humans 2.0," told the group that "DNA is excellent programmable matter." Just as automated sequencing machines can read the natural order of a DNA molecule, automated DNA synthesizing machines can create stretches of deliberately engineered DNA that can then be placed inside a cell so as to modify its normal behavior.” When we think about the implementation of Transhumanist technology, we tend to think of synthetically made chips or wires poking out of our skulls. However, one facet of Synthetic Genomics is the direct recoding of the cells inside a subject. The most pessimistic view of such meddling is human extinction, whereas the optimistic vision is a tale as old as time, the hunt for eternal life. Talking again about George Church’s desire to alter the fundamental building blocks of humanity, Ed Regis later writes: “George Church had the final say in a lecture entitled "Engineering Humans 2.0." Human beings, he noted, are limited by a variety of things: by their ability to concentrate and remember, by the shortness of their lifespans, and so on. Genomic engineering could be used to correct all these deficiencies and more. The common laboratory mouse, he noted, had an average lifespan of 2.5 years. The naked mole rat, by contrast, lives ten times longer, to the ripe old age of 25. It would be possible to find the genes that contributed to the longevity of the naked mole rat, and by importing those genes into the lab mouse, you could slowly increase its longevity. An analogous process could also be tried on human beings, increasing their lifespans and adding to their memory capacity, but the question was whether it was wise to do this.” John Markoff was also a primary source at the event and produced an article for The New York Times, entitled “Synthetic Life”, where he writes: “For someone who has spent the past three decades writing about computing, Dr. Venter’s talk was eye-opening. “I view DNA as an analog information system,” he said. “and I hope to convince you in fact that it is absolutely the software of life.” While watching the videos of the Epstein-funded SpaceX/Edge Master Class in Synthetic Genomics, most of the high-level scientists involved appear impetuous. The issue with quickly developing dangerous technology is that it creates unexpected risk, and that is acknowledged by the participants. Regardless of the potential risks, most of the high-level players attending this event suggest developing technology as quickly as possible while hoping that we’ll also develop solutions simultaneously. The technologies these people are creating could lead to extinction-level events. It can be assured that the vast majority of society would prefer those in charge to approach extinction-level events carefully, rather than at high speed with their fingers crossed. George Church’s Short Course in Synthetic Genomics has been cited in various academic works, such as: Coping with Complexity in Metabolic Engineering, Xenobiology, and A New Form of Life as the Ultimate Biosafety Tool. Over 15 years have passed, and the technology has advanced significantly. However, not significantly enough to extend Jeffrey Epstein’s life. 🧵6/20

QME
1
0
0
67
Gerardo Moscatelli
Gerardo Moscatelli@gemoscatelli·
I'm ready to bet 1M USD that the world population will never reach 8.5bn people in the coming 30 years. We will be heading to 7bn much earlier than expected and this is what we are seeing in #commodities. Once in a lifetime demand destruction black swan: population decline
Gerardo Moscatelli tweet media
English
56
52
333
101.8K
Fabio De Masi 🦩
Fabio De Masi 🦩@FabioDeMasi·
Die Chatkontrolle ist beschlossen, trotz Mehrheit dagegen! 314 Abgeordnete stimmten gegen die Chatkontrolle, nur 276 dafür. Trotzdem geht sie durch. Warum? Weil durch einen umstrittenen Verfahrenstrick 360 Nein-Stimmen nötig gewesen wären, um den Dringlichkeitsantrag zu stoppen. So wird ein Gesetz wiederbelebt, das das Europäische Parlament bereits mehrfach abgelehnt hatte. Die Chatkontrolle 1.0 ist ein Gesetzes-Zombie. Es wird so lange abgestimmt, bis das gewünschte Ergebnis herauskommt. Das schwächt das Vertrauen in die Demokratie. Die Chatkontrolle ist ein Trojanisches Pferd für die anlasslose Massenüberwachung von hunderten Millionen EU-Bürgern. Tech-Konzerne sollen private Kommunikation ohne konkreten Verdacht scannen, obwohl diese Maßnahme keinen wirksamen Beitrag zur gezielten Bekämpfung von Kindesmissbrauch leistet. Die befristete Ausnahmeregelung zur E-Privacy-Richtlinie war ausgelaufen. Das Europäische Parlament hatte sie nicht verlängert. Nun wurde versucht, diese Entscheidung durch erneute Abstimmungen und massiven Druck auf Abgeordnete auszuhebeln. Dabei ist die Chatkontrolle nachweislich nicht erforderlich. Auch nach Auslaufen der Regelung erhielt die Polizei weiterhin zahlreiche Hinweise auf Kindesmissbrauch. Einige Tech-Konzerne scannen ohnehin auf anderer Rechtsgrundlage weiter. Das eigentliche Problem ist nicht der Mangel an Daten, sondern fehlende Kapazitäten für eine effektive Strafverfolgung. Zudem finden viele Straftaten im Darknet oder im analogen Raum statt. Niemand würde akzeptieren, dass der Staat jeden Brief öffnet, um Straftäter zu finden. Warum sollte das bei privaten Chats anders sein? Schon heute können Ermittlungsbehörden bei konkretem Verdacht und mit richterlicher Anordnung auf private Kommunikation zugreifen. Dafür braucht es keine anlasslose Massenüberwachung. Der Schutz von Kindern ist unverzichtbar. Aber dieses berechtigte Anliegen darf nicht als Vorwand dienen, um immer weiter in die Privatsphäre aller Bürger einzugreifen. Es drängt sich der Verdacht auf, dass unter diesem Banner eine Internet-Stasi 2.0 geschaffen werden soll. Wir lehnen das anlasslose Ausschnüffeln von hunderten Millionen Bürgern ab und werden bis zur letzten Sekunde dagegen Widerstand leisten. Gegen die Durchsetzung der Chatkontrolle im Eilverfahren wird es ganz sicher Klagen hageln.
Deutsch
171
855
3K
55K
Tom Renz
Tom Renz@RenzTom·
Have we lost our minds? Are we seriously pushing for Lindsey Graham’s sister? Exactly what qualifies her for this (I believe she works in social services)? America is finally rid of this piece of trash and more Trump is pushing his sister? Can we at least pretend we care about MAGA and MAHA. Wow.
Tom Renz tweet media
English
1.4K
913
4.3K
145K
Ash
Ash@bitcoins1stlady·
👹✡️RABBI SAYS: Non-Jevvs should be distracted with sports & preoccupied with killing each other so they don't focus on what Jevvs are doing to cause all the problems that are destroying them.
English
277
4.8K
11.5K
261.7K
Florian Philippot
Florian Philippot@f_philippot·
Tout ça n’a RIEN à faire au défilé pour la Fête nationale de la France ! Rien !
Florian Philippot tweet media
Français
205
562
2.1K
23K