0xNic

663 posts

0xNic

0xNic

@_0xNic_

Buildor

Katılım Kasım 2020
382 Takip Edilen223 Takipçiler
0xNic retweetledi
0xbow.io
0xbow.io@0xbowio·
gm Ethereum ☀️ It is our great honor to announce the mainnet launch of Privacy Pools! ETH users can now achieve on-chain privacy, while still dissociating from illicit funds It is now up to all of us to Make Privacy Normal Again 🫡 More info in this thread 👇
GIF
English
115
394
1.7K
414.2K
0xNic
0xNic@_0xNic_·
@JoseLoureiro @E_Schhneider @UnstoppableFi As we‘ve explained in the article, community ownership and revenue sharing is paused, not cancelled. You will be able to have a stake again in the future when Unstoppable is profitable and if you are a tokensale participant or former UND holder you will automatically qualify.
English
0
2
6
438
JLoureiro
JLoureiro@JoseLoureiro·
@E_Schhneider @UnstoppableFi I see. Isn’t that too radical? I mean, why can’t holders keep having a stake in unstoppable? Not saying that’s what I want to do, just trying to understand.
English
1
0
0
67
0xNic retweetledi
Unstoppable
Unstoppable@UnstoppableFi·
🎄 Unstoppable is Giving Back! Today an era in the story of Unstoppable comes to an end. The $1,206,478.64 UND Buyback Program is here: ✅ 100% profit for all UND holders on their average buy price ✅ No losses for anyone holding UND ✅ A step towards focusing on building for the future 📝Learn more about why we are doing this and how to claim your here: medium.com/unstoppable-of… 💲 You can claim your $USDC within the next 90 days here: buyback.unstoppable.ooo ⚠️ The Uniswap liquidity will be removed in order to avoid any further trading of $UND. If you are holding $UND, please convert your tokens via the buyback program.
Unstoppable tweet media
English
13
10
23
5.2K
0xNic retweetledi
Unstoppable
Unstoppable@UnstoppableFi·
PSA: We just noticed that even after soon 2 years, some of you haven’t even claimed your UND tokens from the tokensale yet. It this is you, please claim your tokens now at tokensale.unstoppable.ooo
English
1
2
5
1.5K
0xNic retweetledi
Alistor Zimon
Alistor Zimon@AlistorZimon·
A lot of the comments showing curse of knowledge bias, where what they as experienced trenches degens, perceive as simple onboarding and UX flow is still a bad experience riddled with dozens of traps for beginners. Still a lot of work to do to make crypto accessible. 🤷‍♂️
English
1
4
11
1.4K
0xNic retweetledi
Steven Goldfeder
Steven Goldfeder@sgoldfed·
Decentralization matters. We’re not here to replace one set of centralized actors with another.
English
19
22
150
5.4K
0xNic retweetledi
Vladimir S. | Officer's Notes
Vladimir S. | Officer's Notes@officer_secret·
BlueNoroff, a North Korean hacker organization, is targeting cryptocurrency firms with new malware that hits MacOS. Once a user downloads and opens a decoy PDF, the malware is downloaded as a separate file on the MacOS desktop in the background, allowing the attacker to remotely access the victim's machine and steal secret keys. — @Cointelegraph / @WuBlockchain This is why - you should use dangerzone.rocks or just ask to upload any PDF into google docs preview beforehand.
English
10
51
208
31.6K
0xNic retweetledi
Unstoppable
Unstoppable@UnstoppableFi·
Join us this Friday as @0xNic dives into the future of our Mobile App — upcoming new features, current key challenges, and our quest for an easy and fully secure user experience! 💬 Drop your questions below, and we’ll tackle them live! 🔗 x.com/i/spaces/1vOxw…
English
4
7
9
1.3K
0xNic
0xNic@_0xNic_·
@safetyth1rd Happening on every transaction with @UnstoppableFi app. Only reason why unlimited approve was a thing was due to mainnet tx cost and no simple way to batch txs. L2s + smart contract wallets solve this.
English
0
2
3
305
𝕯𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖗
𝕯𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖗@safetyth1rd·
Why can’t this happen today?
kid buu@buuxbt

@safetyth1rd we bundle approve + swap/transfer into a single transaction where approved amount = swap/transfer amount very surprising that no one does this yet - seems like a table stakes security feature

English
7
1
13
3.3K
0xNic retweetledi
Radiant Capital
Radiant Capital@RDNTCapital·
🚨 Security PSA 🚨  To ensure maximum wallet security, this is a reminder to revoke Token approvals!  Visit @RevokeCash or use @Rabby_io to revoke permissions you no longer need. This simple step can help safeguard your assets in the event of an unforeseen exploit. Stay safe!
Radiant Capital tweet media
English
0
65
2.4K
72.5K
0xNic
0xNic@_0xNic_·
Asset availability abstraction is coming 😎 Any chain, any asset, one app.
0xNic tweet media
English
0
4
8
686
0xNic retweetledi
Nick White
Nick White@nickwh8te·
"Unstoppable" is the best way to explain "decentralized" Decentralized is confusing because it combines 4 properties which mean nothing to normal people: 1. Verifiability 2. Immutability 3. Censorship Resistance 4. Liveness Unstoppable is a phrase even Mert's mom would understand, and it neatly covers all 4 properties of decentralization. Blockchains are unstoppable because anyone can verify their integrity to stop others from cheating (verifiability), no one can unilaterally change the chain (immutability), anyone can use them (censorship resistance) at any time (liveness). Basically, unstoppable means that no one can fuck with the chain. I like "permissionless" too, but imo it only covers censorship resistance, not the other 3 properties. Either way, one thing is absolutely clear -- we need better language to get people to understand and care about the value prop of blockchains. "Decentralized" won't cut it.
mert@mert

it's likely better to message blockchains as permissionless rather than decentralized decentralization is an abstract term to anyone not in crypto — permission is a universal and concrete concept for everyone you: "we are building a decentralized financial system" your mother: "johnny, wtf are you talking about? go to bed" vs. you: "we are building a permissionless financial system" your mother: "wait so I can send money to my parents without filling out a bunch of shit at the bank?" in practice, you can't really get permissionlessness without decentralization in the first place — so it's already implied in the term

English
12
25
103
24.3K
0xDesigner
0xDesigner@0xDesigner·
the main issue i keep running into it with ai coding is fetching blockchain data. i'm trying to get a wallet's token balance and transaction history. i've tried thirdweb engine and infura api. the ai doesn't know how to route it (neither do i) and keeps blaming me for entering the api keys incorrectly. i'm sure there's a simple fix that i nor the ai is smart enough to find. any help is appreciated.
0xDesigner@0xDesigner

i haven't been to the gym in over a week. i've hardly even left home. i've just been glued to my computer, failing with cursor over and over again. i want to make working code so bad.

English
41
2
69
21K
0xNic retweetledi
Unstoppable
Unstoppable@UnstoppableFi·
Wonder what Unstoppable devs are up to? Big things are coming. 👇
Unstoppable tweet media
English
1
6
11
1.2K
0xNic retweetledi
invinciBULL🐂
invinciBULL🐂@_invincibull_·
Other apps: Please upload your ID, passport, proof of residence, and a blood sample. @UnstoppableFi: Nah, you’re good. No KYC needed
invinciBULL🐂 tweet media
English
0
5
11
609
Elsa Schneider
Elsa Schneider@E_Schhneider·
@_0xNic_ For that people would need to actually build and not just fork 🫢
English
1
0
1
12
0xNic
0xNic@_0xNic_·
I love that we are trying to solve the downsides of self-custody and UX. But compromising the core values isn‘t the solution. Putting „decentralized“ or „self-custody“ on your website while cutting corners behind the scenes isn’t the way. Put in the work. Build real solutions.
0xNic@_0xNic_

You might be on the spectrum, but self-custody isn’t. See all the “social login” & MPC apps that create “fully self-custodial” wallets with just an email or phone? PSA: if an entity can “recover” access to your wallet with or without your consent *it’s not self-custody*!!!

English
1
2
5
527