DILF in Training

Normies think citations make or break a paper because normies have never created new knowledge. To a normie, a science paper is a pure interpolation of existing knowledge (that's what they did in college). Making up citations breaks the interpolation and makes the paper wrong

1,000 World Cup tickets. $50 each. All for New Yorkers. We fought hard to make the people’s game available to the people — and won. Let the summer of soccer begin.

Curry Barker's ‘OBSESSION’ opens with $16M domestically. The film had a budget of around $750K.

We don't give a flying fuck if you have a car. We do give a fuck if you push for car-centric NYC policy. Lest we forget how childish yall got over congestion pricing, bike lanes, care free zones, and more investment in the MTA. Children. Imbecilic.

Undeniably one of the best performances in any comic book adaptation

As someone commented on IG, this is a "Notwegian".

this moment completely redefined how ash's bird pokémon were treated in the anime. arguably the best evolution

me ignoring all the hate comments on the last episode of The Boys because I enjoyed it

“Oh no, conservatives like our villain!” So they made him suck dick and beg for feces. Peak satire.

the way homelander’s entire body language changed after losing powers was so good, that’s literally a kid. antony starr you are fantastic

There was a lady who started her PhD a year ahead of me. Eventually, she went for her qualifying exam. After her 30 mins presentation, she was questioned by the committee for another 1 hour and 30 minutes. One of the questions she was asked was: Where do transcription and translation take place in the cell? She missed the question completely. I think the committee was surprised because that was considered very basic science. At the end of the exam, she was asked to assess her own performance, which is a common practice. She rated herself very highly, and I think that became another concern for the committee because her performance had been considered poor. They probably expected a more honest self-evaluation. Sadly, she could not continue with the program after that. That was the end of her PhD journey there. But beyond her experience, I learned something important very quickly: never neglect the basics of science. It is easy to become so focused on complex ideas, advanced techniques, and “big” concepts that you overlook the simple foundations that hold everything together. After hearing that story, I intentionally went back to revisit my fundamentals. I downloaded materials, watched YouTube videos, and even refreshed my knowledge of statistics. Mind you, I had earned a distinction in Biostatistics…😁 Yet, I still realized there was more depth and clarity I needed. And interestingly, statistics was part of the questions I was eventually asked during my own exam. I think many people in science and academia become overly fascinated with complexity while underestimating the importance of truly understanding the basics. But the truth is, good science should be simple enough to explain clearly and understand deeply. We must pay more attention to the fundamentals because they are what truly make science solid.

the damage NDMC has done omg