Jason Corso

@CryptoNobler Probably bc trump just stole 1.8 billion from taxpayers.

🚨 BREAKING 🇺🇸 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST CANCELED HIS WEEKEND PLANS AND URGENTLY RETURNED TO WASHINGTON! INSIDERS REPORT THAT INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS HAVE BEEN ORDERED TO BE PRESENT IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING AN “EMERGENCY” SITUATION. SOMETHING EXTREMELY BAD IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW...

World models don't run on scraped text. They need continuous, multimodal observation of the physical world: labeled, time-stamped, geo-grounded. Voxel51's @_JasonCorso_ writes for @FortuneMagazine, "AI models are choking on junk data."

The 15-minute high-level board update is a trap. Without the details, advisors just pattern-match onto other companies and give generic, parrot-like advice. My take: Boardrooms need to operate like university labs. Block out 90+ mins for 1 hard topic. Detail matters. TAF Series #18: @jasoncorso/deep-talk-2e67c2a49c6e" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@jasoncorso/de…

@nazanin_ashrafi I prefer a walk in the woods

Do you prefer "Gemini" for brainstorming ideas or "chatgpt"? I'd like to know what yall think

@CSProfKGD First thing: where’s the scissor Second thing: I miss Blue Max.

Notch trick. OGs know.

@CSProfKGD Yes this is a key point. But what I would like to see more of these days is actual discussion amongst reviewers, especially those in disagreement.

#KostasThoughts: While consensus among reviewers is appreciated, it is not strictly necessary. As an Area Chair, what matters most is understanding each reviewer’s reasoning and decision-making process. That is why it is imperative that reviewers provide a clear final summary explaining why they recommend accepting or rejecting the paper, which concerns were addressed through the rebuttal and discussion, and which concerns, if any, remain unresolved. Simply putting “my concerns were not resolved” is not being a responsible reviewer. If you initially misunderstood parts of the paper or made an error in your assessment, that’s okay we all make mistakes. Please put personal ego aside and focus on making the correct decision based on the technical merits of the paper, the rebuttal, and the discussion.

@CaimingXiong @Recursive_SI Excited to see how this evolves @CaimingXiong Curious tho what the domain is....no free lunch.

Today, we’re excited to launch Recursive (@recursive_si): an exceptional team across London and San Francisco, building AI systems that can safely improve their own capabilities over time.

"Disagree and Commit" is the hardest shift for technical founders who are used to being "right." If you're still second-guessing a team decision 2 weeks later, you're the friction. My take: Conviction > Certainty. Read the full essay on navigating constructive confrontation: @jasoncorso/constructive-confrontation-f697fd67dd9d" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@jasoncorso/co…

@taiyasaki @overleaf Let’s see, what’s the prompt? Hey Claude, help me reimplement an overleaf like web based collaborative editor for latex and make integration with you and other LLMs first class. Let me know if you have questions. I’ll be back in 48 hours.

If @overleaf does not "wake up" and integrate Claude/ChatGPT/... within their UI (vs. writefull) , they are likely to become obsolete and go bankrupt. Reminds me of when MATLAB refused to expose GPU compute... because they had an existing deal with a small startup.

@MedasanX In aggregate, why can't we wait? In individual cases, rtfp. All the source post does is rile up people with mostly meaningless data.

@_JasonCorso_ Then how do we measure it? Because we can't and we have to make a proxy. Publication in top conference is a number that is taken into account in most impact indices. No matter how you measure it, CH is ahead of every other country (including the EU) and second to the US

Show me the impact not the paper count. Paper mills outputting LPUs are a cancer to the field. And the data seems incomplete. In aggregate what about all of the institutions less than paper threshold here.

@mmbronstein Ain't that the truth.

@_JasonCorso_ Impact is hard to measure objectively. The best proxy is the number of citations and it takes years.

@MedasanX No number of papers in top conferences is not a proxy for impact.

@_JasonCorso_ The papers that get published in those venues are top papers. Usually when measuring "impact", the number of papers published in top conferences is the proxy used. Paper mills don't target or get through the selection process of a conference such as ICML.

@MedasanX yes and……

@_JasonCorso_ This is the ICLR conference, one of the most reputable and selective conferences in AI/ML, not your typical third-rate venue.

@adamnemecek1 and github should kill stars and just replace them with the number of other projects that depend on a certain project. stars are a microeconomy. evil

@adamnemecek1 no god no

arXiv should have stars like GitHub.

When we started @Voxel51, I read nearly every startup book I could find. @johndoerr "Measure What Matters" was a big one. My real take: For a small team, A North Star > 50 KRs. Read full essay: @jasoncorso/taf16-measure-62f3b4e8984f" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@jasoncorso/ta…

@Mdkhurshed76417 Ummm. In each did the employee ask for what they wanted? Communication is a two way street.

2021: No salary increase 2022: No salary increase 2023: No salary increase 2024: No salary increase 2025: No salary increase 2026: Employee: “Kindly accept my resignation.” Boss: “But you’re doing such a great job! Why are you leaving?” Employee: “I’ve received a new job offer with a 65% salary increase, and there’s also a guaranteed annual raise based on performance.” 48 hours later…

@CSProfKGD this is a case of book is so much better than movie. I've read this 3x. Such an engaging book. His other book Armada 💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯

1/3 through the book, same core premise as the movie but different story. ❤️ it!

Three months into the Technical Academic Founder (TAF) series. This week #15 is a Redux of the first 6 essays: a roadmap for starting, fundraising, and operating a startup with a specific emphasis on technical founders and academic founders. Full piece here: @jasoncorso/taf-redux-1to6-99b58ce343be" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@jasoncorso/ta…