Priest
6.6K posts

Priest
@_Jidraph
Christ is King! Introvert. Priest ~ Church of man.







SUSPECT IN COURT OVER INCITING VIRAL VIDEO The Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) has obtained a custodial order from the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Kahawa Law Courts, Nairobi, in relation to ongoing investigations into alleged hate speech and ethnic incitement. The respondent, Bare Sahara Ahmed, is currently detained at Kilimani Police Station for a period of 10 days to allow investigators to complete inquiries into the matter. The court has further authorised forensic analysis of relevant digital evidence, including call data records and financial transactions, to support the investigation. This action underscores our commitment to upholding the rule of law and addressing offences that threaten national cohesion and peaceful coexistence. We urge members of the public to exercise responsibility in their communications and refrain from engaging in conduct that may incite division or hatred. #FichuaKwaDCI. Call 0800 722 203 (Toll-free) or WhatsApp at 0709 570 000 to report anonymously. Usiogope!

⚡️ Iran F-5 jet BOMBED US base in Kuwait EARLY in war — NBC BREACHED all AIR DEFENSES ‘1st time enemy fixed-wing aircraft struck an American military base in YEARS’












The starting point is the Constitution which is quite clear that life begins at conception, and the right to life is protected. From that, Article 26(4) does not create a free-standing entitlement to terminate pregnancy. It carves out narrow, medically grounded exceptions like emergency treatment, or where the life or health of the mother is in danger. Properly read, that clause operates as a limitation within the right to life framework, not as a parallel, autonomous right. Calling it a “right to abortion” blurs that structure and ignores the Constitution’s deliberate prioritisation of life, subject only to tightly defined safeguards. A useful analogy is the question that was put forth to @ahmednasirlaw, SC by Lady Justice Njoki Ndungu on whether there exists a “right not to vote.” I borrow his argument that the Constitution in that context guarantees the right to vote, abstention is a practical choice, but not a separately enshrined right. In the same vein, what Kenyan law recognises is a right to life with limited exceptions, not a general right to abortion. Once that limitation is invoked under Article 26(4), then that person becomes automatically entitled to all forms of medical care that comes with that permitted abortion by virtue of Article 43(1)(a) which covers reproductive health care. The high court in this case might have went overboard by establishing a non-existent right; CoA is spot on!

















