Antoine 🇨🇦

1.3K posts

Antoine 🇨🇦

Antoine 🇨🇦

@_aboucher

strategy & bizops @ fingerprintjs / focused on payment fraud and enhancing account security

Katılım Haziran 2020
377 Takip Edilen167 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Antoine 🇨🇦
Antoine 🇨🇦@_aboucher·
The coffee game in Vietnam is so strong
Antoine 🇨🇦 tweet mediaAntoine 🇨🇦 tweet mediaAntoine 🇨🇦 tweet mediaAntoine 🇨🇦 tweet media
English
1
0
4
1.8K
Brian Krassenstein
Brian Krassenstein@krassenstein·
We have left the United States for Montreal. No corruption here.
Brian Krassenstein tweet media
English
11.6K
1.4K
19K
2.1M
chris
chris@chrislevan·
montreal peeps, what's a good late night eat?
English
23
0
10
2.1K
Antoine 🇨🇦
Antoine 🇨🇦@_aboucher·
@mikulaja I think every financial institution in canada and fintech does this and I absolutely hate it
English
0
0
0
156
Jason Mikula
Jason Mikula@mikulaja·
Bilt users also complaining of a hidden 0.2% foreign transaction fee, despite the card being marketed as "no foreign transaction fees" --
Jason Mikula tweet media
English
8
1
23
5.3K
Saud Aziz
Saud Aziz@sauddaziz·
to the PM that decided to add an extra click to start every Slack huddle - why?! @Benioff
English
1
0
3
529
melody
melody@melkuo·
this building really pisses me off as the epitome of what's wrong with architecture in toronto the nicest part is the brick and its detailing, but the ground floor where you actually walk past and can see up close is all boring glass
melody tweet media
English
13
3
164
19.2K
Alexander Fitzgerald
Alexander Fitzgerald@AFitzgerald1992·
Today @IsembardGroup announces our $50m Series A. More factories, more engineers, more countries. If not now, when... 🇬🇧🇺🇸🇩🇪🇫🇷🇺🇦
Alexander Fitzgerald tweet media
English
35
41
362
70.9K
Jay📖
Jay📖@jayluxeed·
If I believe at least one of Anthropic OpenAI Google Meta Amazon Microsoft Nvidia hits $10T in the next 24 months what's the best way to operationalize this bet
English
91
6
838
139.1K
Restructuring__
Restructuring__@Restructuring__·
I will preface this by saying I have immense admiration for Josh Kushner, think he is brilliant, and I will most likely never have a $50bn fund to my name but, aren't these returns kind of mediocre for a leading venture fund in the greatest tech run ever seen in history? Let's look at the first 4 funds, which are obviously great funds and top quartile, and compare them with the Nasdaq, closest liquid index. Since 2011: Thrive - 5.7x | Nasdaq - 8.4x Since 2012: Thrive - 6.1x | Nasdaq - 8.1x Since 2014: Thrive - 5.4x | Nasdaq - 5.5x Since 2016: Thrive - 3.5x | Nasdaq - 4.9x In addition to returns being lower, venture funds are obviously not liquid, and their duration is hard to overstate. The first two funds are almost 15 years old and do not even have 2x DPI... Venture capitalists, thoughts? Note, this is not a perfect comparison because, in theory, venture capital funds are deployed over a few years (vs. all in the vintage year), but this does not change numbers materially.
Restructuring__ tweet media
English
35
21
528
102.5K
Luke Metro
Luke Metro@luke_metro·
Well this aged poorly
English
2
0
55
1.1K
Antoine 🇨🇦
Antoine 🇨🇦@_aboucher·
@melissa Wonder why his comms team decided to write all of it in lowercase
English
0
0
0
254
@melissa
@melissa@melissa·
this is the part that jack wrote you can tell because it's got the curly quote and the rest has straight ones the whole post is well done, he has a comms person who is a highly skilled prompter but jack added this part before hitting post and i like that about jack
@melissa tweet media
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
100
75
3.1K
663.3K
Christian Lassonde
Christian Lassonde@classonde·
It’s sort of crazy that no one even tries to maintain a market map of Canadian VCs. The last one I recall is 10+ years ago by @davidcrow Sort of insane.
English
7
0
23
2.7K
Sheel Mohnot
Sheel Mohnot@pitdesi·
12:03 PT: I write a post about how Stripe acquiring PayPal is a non-starter because of tech and culture debt 12:40 PT: I am wrong
Sheel Mohnot tweet media
Sheel Mohnot@pitdesi

so... who's buying Paypal? It has the potential of being one of the great distressed value opportunities in fintech history. Down ~85%, still generating $5.5B in FCF, 400M consumer accounts with bank info, checkout buttons on millions of merchant sites, and a peer-to-peer brand in Venmo. They have a lot of desirable assets for Stripe (consumer-facing checkout, bank account details for hundreds of millions of consumers, a brand in Venmo) or Apple (good complement to Apple Pay for ecommerce penetration, they never got social payments going, would get Apple back in BNPL). But in both cases, cultural fit makes them a nonstarter. PayPal is a sprawling legacy fintech with 25k employees and decades of technical debt. Neither Stripe nor Apple would want to absorb that. Apple also might face Big Tech antitrust with this kind of thing. Visa & Mastercard could both afford it and they've been creeping into merchant acquiring and checkout. PayPal’s checkout button placement is enormously valuable real estate for either network. The networks have been trying to move beyond interchange into direct merchant relationships, and PayPal could accelerate that by years. I think they may also be burned out on antitrust... either network acquiring the largest independent online checkout provider would (& should!) face brutal regulatory scrutiny. What about Elon??? Elon cofounded Paypal and always wanted it to be called X, so there is some poetry in it coming back under his fold as X... and per "the most entertaining outcome is the most likely" and it sure would be entertaining! X + PayPal + Venmo could genuinely be the Western super app play that he's always wanted. Markets would go crazy. His bandwidth is spread impossibly thin across Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, X, politics, and replying "concerning" to posts at 3am... but you could have made the case he was spread too thin before he started/acquired the last several companies too... Technical debt at Paypal is a big challenge that he knows. I would never count him out, but I just don't see it. IMO, JP Morgan makes the most sense - they've spent heavily on payments and an acquisition could get them closer to building a consumer super app. $50B would be a huge acquisition, even for them, but they could stomach it, assuming they could get regulatory approval. Venmo gives them a P2P brand they’ve never been able to build, especially among younger consumers. PayPal’s branded checkout button sits on millions of merchant sites, distribution JPM has never cracked at that scale. The BNPL book complements Chase’s card lending business. And Braintree’s enterprise merchant processing, combined with Chase Merchant Services, would create a strong acquiring platform... all things they want. They haven't acquired any major fintech companies (the ones they've done have mostly been duds), but I could see it. I do wonder what regulatory approval would be like here- the OCC, Fed, and FDIC would all need to weigh in... There's a major cultural integration risk, like there would be for anyone acquiring PayPal... I do think any of the other massive banks could be potentials (Bank of America, Citi and Wells, in that order), but I don't see any of them as being as ambitious. Would be ironic for the company that was supposed to eat the banks to get eaten by one! Final thought would be PE... it's still spitting off $5.5B in FCF, and has a bunch of assets you could split off into pieces after cutting costs aggressively. Anyone I missed?

English
26
1
203
28.9K