liquid 💧

10.6K posts

liquid 💧 banner
liquid 💧

liquid 💧

@_proxystudio

co-founder, @clanker_world c. 2024 | liquid c. 2026

Seattle, WA Katılım Ocak 2024
1.5K Takip Edilen20.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
>Interested in creating or building with liquid markets? >driven to create valuable work and open to alternative funding mechanisms? >want to learn more or chat with me & @m00npapi? get in touch! please use this link to request a call >>calendar.app.google/xzAhv1NnBmXJDt…<< **requested calls require approval from hosts, we may get in touch to reschedule or request more information**
English
10
2
44
3.4K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
looked at a lil boat yesterday this guy is selling (22' ed monk designed sloop, built in 1940) and it was moored at such an unreal Seattle boathouse beneath Fremont bridge
liquid 💧 tweet medialiquid 💧 tweet media
English
4
0
18
1.3K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
There was pretty normal sniping and insider activity as far as I can tell, what made this launch different was actually the real demand that existed for this launch Most coins simply don't have enough demand to sustain rising price action over literally any period of time
Kien@FamKien

Lienfi was an example of a good launch No snipers, some insiders - but that’s okay No overhyping💪 Many faded early, context and info matters the most. That’s what I am doubling down to deliver for 👑

English
5
1
20
3.8K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
Stealth liquid product launch this weekend? Flywheel activated? Narrative motion? Swag different? Who knows (me, i know)
English
8
2
39
1.8K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
going goblin mode but for acquiring enough ai psychosis to ship this product faster
English
2
2
20
1.1K
liquid 💧 retweetledi
Gami
Gami@gami_vc·
this new 🌈 update secure?
Gami tweet media
English
13
4
45
5.1K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
@shawmakesmagic What crypto team rn has the problem Of more demand than they can handle & not enough capital to grow to meet it.... Don't raise Shaw pls
English
0
0
5
372
Shaw (spirit/acc)
Shaw (spirit/acc)@shawmakesmagic·
We’re not raising I know everyone will use it once they try it And it’s already built So why would I raise? The only ideas worth building can’t risk the misalignment with outside capital, sorry
English
10
2
60
3.3K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
Ever have one of these days? What's funny is actually had a great dev/product day deep in the compute-denominated, self-funded agent trenches working on the first of many $lig flying wheels
liquid 💧 tweet media
English
2
1
7
1K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
Mistake lots of traders make re tokens is assuming that they need to pay super close attention to them. Most significant price action will happen in extremely brief windows when excitement and some release outpaces whatever desire exists among traders on those days to continue selling random token for eth. Most days will be pain, many months will bring boredom, and only a few days (if any days!) will give you coin-goners the 20-50-100x candles you lust after. Easiest way to die is chasing a feeling , more boring and efficient traders probably seek to minimize the cost of their exposure to the painful chop that endures between those heights
English
2
4
18
1.4K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
my hypersnap airdrop(s) are absurd
English
4
1
18
2.4K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
Obsessively track how much money u make people. No matter how much u want to grow, how fast you actually are growing, cuz really this simple metric will tell you far more about your project health than anything else
joshua@joshqharris

In it's first month, @PixieChess has already paid out 34.70 ETH ($78,429 USD) to players. And the prize pool is still only growing!! Buy some pieces & join the fun!!

English
1
1
12
1.5K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
Good *narrative* and heavy *volume* brought new *liquidity* to base imo The capital flight after the narrative died down wasnt a huge surprise imo 1. it was mercenary capital (trenchers trenching) 2. almost none of those agentic product runners were able to follow up the hype 3. Most were launched on bankr, which dominated the meta @ the product level, once $bankr whales began to exit there wasn't a sufficiently exciting product to maintain the flag carrying type signal forward & higher. Not enuf demand on base for so many roughly similar tokens, many such cases 4. Finally, look @ unclaimed fees for the openclaw tokens. Some of the most interesting products have serious fees unclaimed. Some others never authenticated or claimed the tokens that were deployed around their products. What appeared from afar to be a product meta was a PvP trader meta, no real production (apart from the few novel implementations, talented founders who did build shit) of net new UX or use cases Next wave will come from local talent iterating around weird niche obsessive interests they have that the public rejects or else some new pitch emerges capable of pilling outside talent that the cost of this alt funding model is worth carrying for a talented, contrarian founder
English
1
0
0
48
Kien
Kien@FamKien·
openclaw brought new blood to Base. some stayed and now nothing. Founders of Base and launchpads need to cook for us 🙏
English
12
1
39
2.7K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
as in i could receive multiple % of initial supply? any proceeds will be held or used to fund TWAP buys of $liq
English
1
0
3
548
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
liquid is the #3 launchpad on base by revenue over the past 30D, earning ~$2k > than @zora, $5k more than binance's launchpad
English
4
1
40
2.1K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
ive seen open, permissionless markets fund more high-potential devs, founders & protocols with a higher hit rate than.... - fortune 500 companies running multiple rounds of accelerators & entire VC arms - companies building social networks using "rewards" or "dev funding" - open bounties - subscription models (id put this at #2 in terms of tangible output, probably bounties #3) - other open funding models like nouns dao offshouts (yellow for ex) - presales (lol, probably the lowest impact for dev in crypto overall... tangibly worse outcomes) the base funding model we iterated around and pioneered with clanker in nov, 2024 was simple: LP fees emerged on Uniswap to incentivize Liquidity Providers to make markets with ETH & Tokens. With a 'fair launch' model, tokens are deployed at low marketcaps with 'single sided' liquidity. There is really little need for or high demand to provide additional liquidity as weth accumulates when people *want* to buy tokens (tokens were minted for nothing, there are usually plenty of them especially at low prices, demand is low so no need for outside LPs). The trad model was to lock LPs, zora's pre-clanker launchpad (for ex) burned the LP. the LP fees were essentially ignored and base lacked high demand for smaller tokens. big tokens often used aerodrome, which had a totally different incentivization model. we built our entire business around those ignored, forgotten, BURNED, and outdated fees. the biggest tokens all launched via 1% univ3 pools. a low fee. since nov 2024, every single major launchpad on SOL and EVM chains has leveraged LP fees to incentivize creators to back individual coins and the "use trading fees to fund development" has emerged as a popular narrative for founders in crypto from shitapps like Believe to other launchpads like Pump Fun, Bags, Virtuals, Bankr (og launchpad = clanker protocol, then transitioned to Doppler or the Zora launcher protocol in 2026). Even smaller launchpads like Zora and Flaunch iterated around this core stream of value from increasing speculative activity for smaller tokens. whats amazing about it to me is how fees have gone up. the focus on fee capture as volume has fallen is a great reminder that value emerges naturally when there is a loose network of collaboraters and competitors. when the focus becomes the launchpads themselves, the assumed value of anything growing on top of it compresses. when the value is in the assemblage of the network, it can expand and reciprocate exponentially. find good deployers, encourage them, get them funded, and you can charge far lower fees while producing far bigger outcomes. don't forget: the projects and people you perceive of as having "made it" have almost universally failed at their core missions. few have generated significant revenue, even fewer enjoy a position of stability. OpenSea never accounted for Blur providing a unique, superior product experience. Uniswap didn't account for Velo/Aero integrating throughout L2 networks that were unestablished and low-volume at the time. YOU CAN WIN, at any given moment, by taking action. just has to be the right course, but to find that all it takes is looking at the same old problem creatively. capital isn't your constraint, dev resources isn't it either. get after it, build your network, cook
English
4
1
24
2.4K
liquid 💧
liquid 💧@_proxystudio·
the firm called....surprisingly impressive CV working on larger protocols gotta get them hyped on the opportunity building liquid markets tho
English
2
0
16
845