Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Tim Grove
1.2K posts

Tim Grove
@_timgrove
Design @cradleaudio and @marsblueberries.
Sydney Katılım Mayıs 2013
620 Takip Edilen736 Takipçiler

@RaphaelRau @cdordelly Probably the most realistic sim I’ve seen. But what remains in the approach toward realism? There still always seems to be an obvious separation between fluid, collider and grain. Is it some sort of interdependent viscosity? Not a criticism of the work!
English

Holy moly this looks so good!
Amazing seeing the views underwater with all the godray-caustics, caustics on the bottom, sand sim as well as particles in the water. Also I love the "Over Under" shots in between. Just wow! Looks like a immense amount of work!
Jeremy White@jeremywhitefx
Hippo fluid scene pushed to 100M particles made with HydroFX. Foam, bubbles, and spray all simmed together in one system for a cohesive result, fully GPU accelerated. Meshed + extra sand interaction in Houdini, final lookdev/render in Blender. Get HydroFX storm-vfx.com
English

@leventnacakci @mxjxn Directly asked him about this years ago and he repeatedly deleted his replies as he was crafting a response that he believed would satisfy the question.
English
Tim Grove retweetledi

Refik Anadol’s work frequently employs terms like “fluid dynamics,” “latent space,” and “algorithmic brushstrokes,” which give the viewer a false sense of intellectual depth. But the reality is this: these terms often serve to mask the artist’s aesthetic choices behind a façade of scientific authority.
When the artist says, “I am visualizing bird sounds recorded in a forest,” the viewer is led to believe that the resulting image is a natural and objective representation of those sounds. However, as discussed earlier, the direction of the flow or the choice of color is entirely arbitrary. In a scientific experiment, input A should consistently produce output B, or at least the relationship should be demonstrable. Here, however, input A (bird sound) can be transformed into color C or motion D depending on the artist’s mood that morning. This is not an experiment; it is simply decoration.
Phrases like “artificial intelligence is dreaming” or “data sculpture” mystify technical processes. Calling a pixel-generation process based on statistical probabilities “dreaming” is nothing more than presenting a basic mathematical regression as something magical. This causes the work to derive its power not from its own aesthetics, but from the “coolness” of science and technology.
If we were to replace the bird sounds with the sound of a vacuum cleaner using the same “mapping” settings, we would still obtain a “mesmerizing” visual.
In other words, the beauty of the image does not come from the essence of the data, but entirely from the artist’s graphics engine.
In this context, extracting data from bird sounds is not a technical necessity, but rather a storytelling device—a marketing element of the project.
Wrapping data in a scientific veneer reinforces the illusion that the work is “meaningful.” But once this illusion dissolves, what remains is merely a high-resolution “screensaver.” Real science uses data to understand reality; this kind of “art,” by contrast, uses data merely as spectacle.
Instead of saying, “I shaped this data according to my own will and created something beautiful,” the artist claims: “Through scientific algorithms, I revealed the hidden architecture of the data.” This rhetoric is nothing more than putting on a mask of scientific authority to influence the viewer.
This form of pseudo-scientific framing is monetized; data is dramatized, the viewer is drawn into a sense of technological awe, and reality is obscured through spectacle.
English

@hassanrahim Seen the 50s car guys 3D scanning and printing dashboards with every customisation they could ever want before using the 3D printed part as the base for retrimming. Truly futuristic car customisation, not to mention what it means for fabrication.
English
Tim Grove retweetledi

@Osinttechnical @Faytuks There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.
- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
English

This image is having the opposite of the desired effect, that QuickTime skin looks sweet.
David Cole@irondavy
English
Tim Grove retweetledi
Tim Grove retweetledi


Daikoku Futo PA out the window at 280km/h
Peter / 1k(x)@pet3rpan_
Armor Of God by @_timgrove collected on @rodeodotclub
Indonesia
Tim Grove retweetledi


Tim Grove retweetledi
Tim Grove retweetledi

Imagine paying $2000 for aluminum luggage when Pelican Air exists.

Mark Moran for U.S. Senate@itsmarkmoran
Hey @SouthwestAir - uh one quick question… How the fuck does this happen?
English

Strongly recommend seeing Ryoji Ikeda you can get to a show, seeing superposition 10 years ago changed a lot for me.
G Jones@gjonesbass
ryoji ikeda’s ultrasonics show was the most intense thing i’ve ever seen…this extremely loud was so insane
English










