aDogOnTheCouch

@AesirAesthetics What about the purple haired old lady who nagged everyone to death and then crashed her car?

I think the problem with modern Star Wars is that there are no cool actors in it anymore

@A_townspeaks Truly the goddess of weeeees-dome

@JTAlexander Conan knew what he was doing

I'll be damned.

@glen_with1n 1970's America was homogenous and able to course correct. America of 2026 cannot.

It should be emphasized that permanent DST has been already tried, in 1973-1974. People didn’t like it. The issue lies in the elongated darkness in morning hours. The US is a large country geographically. Depending on where you live, being on permanent DST may not have you see sunrise until 9AM during the darkest parts of winter. Yes, this is correct. It’s an unfortunate result of the US being in the northern hemisphere and the Earth’s 23 degree tilt. We all like our longer summer evening light on DST, but the opposite will occur in winter with longer darkness in the morning. Tbh, I’m not in favor of it. Keep the time change. It sucks, yes, but you’ll be complaining more if it’s set to be the other.

@MarioNawfal Who decides that it's limited?

I have a feeling a limited assassination strike by Israel is about to take place in Iran

@AppyOrtho My hot take is that only people like you should be allowed to serve in politics.

I have no ancestors known to me that arrived after 1776 and I’ve done extensive family history (much of which I post on my account). I am not rare, this is normal for Southerners. We are not related to the Ellis Island folks.

@oldmedia Even the bottle caps had good manners back then.

Remember when you didn’t have to enter your personal info online to win a soda?

I have a soyjak of this somewhere in my camera roll

@MyLordBebo Yes, all mobile phones are, in fact, nuisance phones.

The Simpsons did it again … 🤣🤣

@AndyHermanNFL He just needs to tip toe around on every 7th blade of grass which is synthetic.

Time to tear out the grass at Lambeau.

@shaolin_flow @DJ_CURFEW All the customers are getting laid off

@DJ_CURFEW > The bottleneck of user research is gone. It takes us just one mention of an agent to kickoff research and analyze results. This is a sure fire way to ignore the most important part of your business, the customer.

Today we reduced headcount by 22%. The business is the strongest it's ever been. So I think it's important to be direct about what I'm seeing and why. First, I made this decision and I own it. I did it because the way to operate at the highest level of productivity is changing, and to win the future, ClickUp needs to change with it. Second, this wasn't about cutting costs. Most savings from this change will flow directly back into the people who stay. We'll be introducing million-dollar salary bands. If you create outsized impact using AI, you'll be paid outside of traditional bands. Most importantly, I have the deepest gratitude for those affected. We're doing this from a position of strength specifically so we can take care of people properly. Everyone affected receives a package aimed at honoring their contributions and easing the transition. I only see two options: wait for this to play out gradually in the market or be honest about what I'm seeing and act proactively. THE 100X ORGANIZATION The primary change is that we're restructuring around what I call 100x org. The goal is 100x output. The roles required to build at the highest level are fundamentally different than they were a year ago. Incremental improvements to existing systems won't get us there. We need new ones. That means creating enough disruption to rebuild rather than iterate on what's already broken. The common narrative is that AI makes everyone more productive. It doesn't. Many of the workflows of today, if left unchanged, create bottlenecks in AI systems. These roles will evolve. But waiting for that to happen naturally means falling behind now. The 100x org is actually heavily dependent on people - infinitely more than today. This is only possible with 10x people that have embraced and adopted new ways of working. THE BUILDERS, AGENT MANAGERS, AND FRONT-LINERS — THE BUILDERS: 10X ENGINEERS I don't think most companies have internalized what's actually happening with AI in engineering. The common narrative is that AI makes all engineers more productive. That may be true in isolation, but at an organization level - that is the farthest thing from reality. Here's what we've validated recently at ClickUp: the great engineers, the ones who can orchestrate, architect, and review, are becoming 100x engineers. They're not writing code. They're directing agents that write code. The skill is judgment. AI makes the best engineers wildly more productive, and everyone else using AI slows these engineers down. Think about it - the bottlenecks are (1) orchestration - telling AI what to do, and (2) reviewing - what AI did. Everything is leapfrogged and no longer needed. So who do you want orchestrating and reviewing code? And how do you want your best engineers to spend their time? If your best engineers are spending time reviewing other people's code, then this is inherently an inefficient bottleneck. These engineers can review their agent's code much faster than reviewing human code. The new world is about enabling your 10x engineers to become 100x. The wrong strategy is to push every engineer to use infinite tokens. Companies doing this are celebrating 500% more pull requests. But customer outcomes don't match the volume of code being generated. I call this the great reckoning of AI coding, and every company will face this soon if not already. More code is just another bottleneck to the best engineers, and ultimately to your company's impact as well. — THE BUILDERS: 10X PRODUCT MANAGERS Product management and design roles are merging. Designers that have customer focus, become more like product managers. And product managers that have intuition for UX become more like designers. The bottleneck of user research is gone. It takes us just one mention of an agent to kickoff research and analyze results. The bottleneck of product <> design iteration is also gone. The product builder iterates on their own, along with agents and skills that ensure alignment with quality and strategy. Also controversial today - I believe that the wrong strategy is to have your PMs shipping code - that just introduces another bottleneck that the best engineers will waste their time on. To be clear, PMs should be coding but they should do this in a playground to iterate, validate, and scope. That code should not go to production. Everything outside of managing systems, orchestrating AI, and reviewing output becomes a bottleneck. That's why the other roles that are critical along with these are the systems managers (to reduce bottlenecks) along with a bottleneck you can't replace - customer meeting time. — THE SYSTEM MANAGERS Ironically, the people that automate their jobs with AI will always have a job. They become owners of the AI systems - agent managers. We have many examples of these people at ClickUp. The underlying systems in which we operate are absolutely critical to get right. I think most companies are delusional to think they can iterate on existing systems and compete in this new world. You must create enough disruption so that old systems are deprecated entirely. If there's any definition for 'AI native' that's what it is. — THE FRONT-LINERS In a world that will become saturated with AI communication, the human touch will matter more than anything to customers. This is a bottleneck that you shouldn't replace - even when agents are high enough quality to do video meetings. One-on-one meeting time with customers is something that shouldn't be automated. The systems around the meetings should be - so that front-liners spend nearly 100% of their time with customers. REWARDING 100X IMPACT In a world where companies are able to do so much more with less, where does that excess money go? In our case, much of the savings in this new operating model will flow directly back to those that enabled it. We must reward people that create productivity accordingly. This aligns incentives on both sides. Plus, in a world where your best people create 100x impact, you can't afford to lose them. You should aim to retain these employees for decades. The context they have and their ability to efficiently orchestrate and review will be nearly impossible to replace. Compensation bands of today should be thrown out the door. We're introducing $1 million cash/year salary bands with a path available to nearly everyone in the company if they produce 100x impact by creating or managing AI systems. THE FUTURE Nearly every company will make changes like these. The ones that do it proactively will define what comes next. The future is not fewer people. It's different work, new roles, and better rewards for those who embrace it. We're already seeing entirely new roles emerge, like Agent Managers, that didn't exist a year ago. ClickUp is positioning to lead this shift, not just internally, but for our customers too. I've never been more certain about where we're headed.

@ITGuy1959 This represents a resounding victory to Senate Rs. Trump got himself richer off the whole thing. Voters L.

Looking more and more like the over-arching lesson from Trump’s improbable journey back to the presidency is… …never underestimate the ability of Senate Republicans to clutch defeat from the jaws of victory.

@blk613 @RapidResponse47 You voted for clean food and standard time, sorry you actually get legalized poison and permanent DST. No refunds!

@RapidResponse47 Dear Mr. President, We tried Permanent Daylight Savings Time in 1974. It was a disaster! Permanent Standard Time is the healthiest. MAHA

@SolaceCinema Who gives a shit about Connie

A fourth ‘GODFATHER’ film is in the works. Based on the novel “Connie” and told from the perspective of Vito Corleone’s only daughter.

@FischerKing64 Fortunately for them Republican voter disillusion and a crash with Indy's may make those issues moot.

My guess as to why the Democratic National Committee won't release its "autopsy" on what went wrong in the 2024 POTUS election is that it contains sensible advice. Like "dial back the trans stuff" or "stop vilifying whites." But this would enrage their base. Rock/hard place.

@DeItaone Smarter than his father

IRAN'S SUPREME LEADER HAS ORDERED THAT NEAR-WEAPONS-GRADE URANIUM MUST STAY IN IRAN

@DannyKPolitics So Republicans CAN pull off election fraud and ballot stuffing but generally choose not to? Or are just worse at it than Dems?

Ed Gallrein drew 57,053 votes in the 2026 GOP primary. That is a 351% surge in the anti-Massie vote. That is a biggest surge in U.S. election history. Massie’s vote rose 18%, from 39,929 to 47,018. Total GOP primary turnout nearly doubled in an off-year race. Money, Trump, and pro-Israel can’t explain it alone. Or maybe it can. But a 351% challenger surge is not normal. It deserves precinct-level scrutiny. I call for an audit & recount!

@Peter_Bukowski Still go back to the Texans in 2024, Love was slinging it around and thew the hardest piss missile in the history of the NFL for a TD to Kraft, and ML watched all that and said "enough, time for this to end"

Every Jordan Love stat from last year SCREAMS "Let Jordan Love throw the ball more to every part of the field, in every situation possible." He just needs more volume.

@Peter_Bukowski People want the production to match the efficiency closer to the way it did for him later in 2023. If that's important to people they need to take it up with ML.

Jordan Love remains a ball knower test

@Peter_Bukowski I don't think people know what a TE is. Simple as.

Winning vs. an All-Pro LB. But let's complain about his route running. Like criticizing a new F-150 for having a wide turning radius.