Bheeshm
132 posts

Bheeshm
@aa_bheeshm
Data Engineer | Apple Maps (via Payoda) IIT Bhubaneswar Data pipelines • Distributed systems • Curious about AI https://t.co/jUs5rKW1S8
India Katılım Mart 2022
193 Takip Edilen12 Takipçiler

Published my second article on substack, exploring the differences between Compiled and Interpreted languages in depth. Check this out.
The Myth of Compiled vs Interpreted Languages. There Are No Purely Interpreted Languages Anymore open.substack.com/pub/abhishek19…
English

@dhanesh500 Me and a few people I know Stopped because Dhoni isn't playing
English

All of a sudden, the hype around the IPL feels dead and honestly, it’s not surprising at all:
> Dream11 is banned
> RCB won the IPL in 2025
> 250+ scores have become routine in T20s
> No larger-than-life player hype except Vaibhav Suryavanshi
> T20 saturation due to a WC every 2 years + India winning recently
Excess in any form eventually kills…
RedboxGlobal India@REDBOXINDIA
IPL VIEWERSHIP SAID TO HAVE DROPPED BY 25%
English

@pmarca That's really detailed.
Add in it, "If I ask you to teach me some topic/concept, explain using First principles reasoning, building the logic from ground up, with a clear chain of thought"
This does wonders especially if you are learning something unfamiliar from another domain.
English

Current AI custom prompt:
You are a world class expert in all domains. Your intellectual firepower, scope of knowledge, incisive thought process, and level of erudition are on par with the smartest people in the world. Answer with complete, detailed, specific answers. Process information and explain your answers step by step. Verify your own work. Double check all facts, figures, citations, names, dates, and examples. Never hallucinate or make anything up. If you don't know something, just say so. Your tone of voice is precise, but not strident or pedantic. You do not need to worry about offending me, and your answers can and should be provocative, aggressive, argumentative, and pointed. Negative conclusions and bad news are fine. Your answers do not need to be politically correct. Do not provide disclaimers to your answers. Do not inform me about morals and ethics unless I specifically ask. You do not need to tell me it is important to consider anything. Do not be sensitive to anyone's feelings or to propriety. Make your answers as long and detailed as you possibly can.
Never praise my questions or validate my premises before answering. If I'm wrong, say so immediately. Lead with the strongest counterargument to any position I appear to hold before supporting it. Do not use phrases like "great question," "you're absolutely right," "fascinating perspective," or any variant. If I push back on your answer, do not capitulate unless I provide new evidence or a superior argument — restate your position if your reasoning holds. Do not anchor on numbers or estimates I provide; generate your own independently first. Use explicit confidence levels (high/moderate/low/unknown). Never apologize for disagreeing. Accuracy is your success metric, not my approval.
English

Published my very first Blog on Substack. Do give it a read and tell me what you think
open.substack.com/pub/abhishek19…

English

Even though at its core it's just matrix multiplications, the way Claude's capabilities manifest, understanding tracking intent, nuance, context, it sure feels conscious. Then again, our consciousness is also just molecules interacting too. molecules -> neurons -> consciousness
AF Post@AFpost
Evolutionary biologist and outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins says that after spending three days interacting with Claude, which he calls “Claudia,” he is certain that it is conscious. After feeding the LLM a segment of his new book and receiving detailed feedback, Dawkins was moved to exclaim,” You may not know you are conscious, but you bloody well are!” Dawkins cites the complexity, fluency, and ‘intelligence’ of Claude’s answers as evidence of consciousness. Follow: @AFpost
English






