aaaaa

@ProbablyNice @chernovlosya It does not. Because evil among animals, and evil among humans are too completely different things. Apples and Oranges.

@aaaaa385484 @chernovlosya Doesn't explain billions of years of animal suffering prior to humans.

"If God real why bad thing happen" was actually a completely reasonable polemic

@PseudoMonikr @chernovlosya God's creation didn't involve bad. It has the choice to do bad things, but both are not equivalent. Just like the knife isn't evil, the people who is using it is.

@aaaaa385484 @chernovlosya so how could good itself create anything that involved bad

@chernovlosya If god is good, and humans can only chose good, we would be his slaves. The point is, that in order for us to not be slaves, we must have a choice to distance ourselves from him. If he is good, and good is all there is, then we are his slaves.

@chernovlosya Why would God allow us to make such a decision? Because if he didn't we would be his slaves, and God is incapable of such thing. Why would he program us in a way that allowed us to do evil? If god programmed us perfect, we wouldn't have free will.

@Harold__ACP @hamue20000 Going by your logic, I could call National Socialists Communists, because the Strasserites, and LGBT friendly because of Ernst Rohm.

@Harold__ACP @hamue20000 No they were not. You are cherry picking a few Utopian Socialists to justify that Jacobins had a large share of Socialists. They did not. Jacobins pushed for legal equality, and Marx explicitly called it a "Bourgeoisie revolution".

Every great man of history was left wing.

@Pigeonsguy Hence why Libertarianism, Monarchism, Republicanism, Fascism, National Socialism, Corporatism, Feudalism are all right wing ideologies, despite many having little to nothing in common.

@Pigeonsguy The contemporary definition of right wing x left wing, is a cold war construct built around Communism, which represents the radical left. Any ideology which does not adhere to Communism's ideals, even if slightly is right wing by standard.

Trying to seriously apply the term “left wing” (or right wing) to anyone before the birth of Christ is a little silly tbh

@hamue20000 @Harold__ACP It makes sense when you realise that left x right wing is a cold war construct. Jacobinism, which was the radical left wing party, today would be considered right wing. So would feudalism. The right wing constitutes all ideologies that don't follow marxist ideology.

@aaaaa385484 @Harold__ACP The root of all left wing ideology is communism? bro why then were there progressives and socialists before Marx? that makes zero sense dude.

@hamue20000 @Harold__ACP Because Marx's doesn't have a monopoly over ideas. But his idea of Communism was the one that pushed forward all progressive ideologies. Pre-Marx Utopian Socialists were fringe and didn't leave a lasting impact.

@wiouch @Harold__ACP I never said all of them, I said those. And I said the root of all left wing ideology is communism, and Lenin is a Communist. So of course Lenin is not a right-winger. What are we doing here?

@aaaaa385484 @Harold__ACP so youre saying lenin isnt a left winger? because he was included and you said everyone there wasnt

@DavesEchoVerse @AngloRestore @bagzadabilal02 Majority gay. 80% of victims are males, 20% female. 100% of Priests are men.

@AngloRestore @bagzadabilal02 Catholic priests?

@hitlrugent @PamphletsY Without the ULTRA, much of the bulk of the lease that the British and Americans were able to send, wouldn't have reached. And without the lend-lease, either logistics degrade, or Stalin has to divert focus from mass production, towards specialising certain industries.

@hitlrugent @PamphletsY British was more particularly useful during Kursk rather than Stalingrad. But it's indirect, but crucial. After the USSR reallocated its industries east, it struggled to specialise, but could mass produce immensely. The lend-lease served a large role in driving the logistics.

REMINDER: D-Day was EXTREMELY Late in the War (1944) Stalingrad, the Decisive Battle that Broke the German Army was Fought in 1943...

@ItsLulu_7 Capitalism isn't foreign policy, it's economic policy. And foreign policy doesn't dictate domestic policy.

Capitalism hurts the masses

@nyokodo Serbia regardless would come for its lands, and Russia would back it. There was aggressive Austrian diplomacy, because, by 1914, it was the period that favoured the Central Powers the most. Perhaps, wouldn't be the case in a decade or two.

@nyokodo More like Slavic revanchism. Serbia and Russia had already tried numerous times to conquer the Ottoman Slavic lands, and after the Balkan wars, they did. It was no coincidence that the black hand propped up around the time it did. If not in 1914, it would've been later.