Pickmeman

185 posts

Pickmeman

Pickmeman

@abduffevhyfc

Gf

Katılım Şubat 2022
9 Takip Edilen5 Takipçiler
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@yechielroth @AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran Other than cars/weapons everything else is pretty much made in china-actually USA probably can't produce single a car that is 100% domestic - now all electronics are Chinese - they do have a strong service sector but the gap is closing with other competitions - comes back to
English
1
0
0
9
Yechiel Roth
Yechiel Roth@yechielroth·
@abduffevhyfc @AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran The US has Dominance or at least a strong stake in almost every global industry, most emerging technology starts in the US. The US “petrodollar” or reserve currency is a result of the economic power not the cause of it.
English
2
0
0
13
Arash Azizi آرش عزیزی
Arash Azizi آرش عزیزی@arash_tehran·
Btw America is not collapsing. It controls 25 percent of the world GDP and, at its worst case scenario, it will still be one of the top three major powers for at least another 100 years
English
200
122
1.5K
103.9K
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@yechielroth @AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran that is just the trade deficit add to it government budget etc and you have a catastrophe - usa is. still a reach country no one is saying no but at the current level it can't function without USD.
English
1
0
2
7
Yechiel Roth
Yechiel Roth@yechielroth·
@abduffevhyfc @AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran I think saying that US world dominance is mostly based on the USD being the world reserve currency are some professors and tik tokers fantasy, the US dominated close to 50% of the world GDP in the 1940s, the US has the best geography combination of natural resources.
English
3
0
1
19
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@yechielroth @AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran In 1970 USA trade surplus is + (~$2–3 billion) in 2025 minus -$901 billion -- where is the one almost trillion coming from "debt paid by debt"(printing)- without USD being the world reserve currency USA can't function a couple of days
English
0
0
1
8
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@yechielroth @AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran Right now the only thing keeping the USA afloat is the dollar. Us If they keeping managing it badly like they are now using it as a weapon every second and manipulating every market they will ends up losing it in the long and with it goes the American empire
English
1
0
0
15
Yechiel Roth
Yechiel Roth@yechielroth·
@abduffevhyfc @AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran China does have more people, more manufacturing capacity and faster economic growth, but is short in many other areas, it is the US’s only foreseeable competitor unless a new superpower country or alliance emerges in the future.
English
1
0
1
22
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@yechielroth @AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran I think UK is an extremely poor country with resources. They don't really have natural resources and they are managing the north sea oil really bad . Adding to it all major investments around the world is being dominated by USA companies
English
0
0
0
8
Yechiel Roth
Yechiel Roth@yechielroth·
@abduffevhyfc @AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran So basically Airplanes and Rockets helped make the UK model obsolete. Going on this explanation, the US arguably was the most strategic geography, combined with the best technology in Air and Water
English
3
0
1
19
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@yechielroth @AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran I think what made UK obselet that they just are poor they can afford anything and hence can't project power the UK business modal was on "plunder" the countries the occupies. USA just came and soft stole their colonies .
English
0
0
0
5
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@IndexSabot Nvm underestimate a country the us couldn't beat at a trade war. The more they spent building stuff the better they get it is called experience.
English
0
0
0
23
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@IndexSabot Quality equals how much time you spend on it not just money You can get low quality thing from china and you can get iphons/Teslas etc from china
English
1
0
0
550
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@TR63247959 @aleksthgrt So china can build them from scratch but can't man them - what do you think is harder driving the car or making it 😂
English
0
1
5
263
TR
TR@TR63247959·
@aleksthgrt The Chinese may have more ship, but not enough sailors to man them. Will China take their workmen out if the factories to many their navy. If so, their export would drop and the money flow too.
Woodstock, GA 🇺🇸 English
4
1
4
7K
Aleksey The Great 🇷🇺🎖
Aleksey The Great 🇷🇺🎖@aleksthgrt·
🇹🇷🎖Retired Turkish Admiral Cem Gurdeniz : ▪️The number of warships in the American navy suddenly dropped to 600, then to 400, and then to 298. ▪️The quality of the weapons still reflects the 80s and 90s. The Tomahawk missile is almost 35 years old. ▪️However, in terms of weapon effectiveness, the Russians and Chinese have surpassed America. ▪️China's shipbuilding capacity is 232 times ahead of the US. While the US has 7 major shipyards, China has 150. ▪️In all prepared scenarios, the American navy suffers very serious damage in the first 3 days of the war. ▪️Their situation is very difficult.
Aleksey The Great 🇷🇺🎖 tweet media
English
236
1.5K
7K
453.4K
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@GeoPDude @NotWoofers It is not economically viable to transfer oil by land. Tanker moves much more oil at time than a single oil truck. Oil storage already next to ports. It is like moving brick by brick from A to B instead of putting them on the truck and going from A to B
English
2
0
0
90
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@yechielroth @AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran That grip would have lasted and transitioned into what the USA do now with countries but the UK strategicly lost at ww2 alongside france. They didn't lose military but they lost economically after their "Allie" took everything they had around the world. Now they are just poor.
English
1
0
0
30
Yechiel Roth
Yechiel Roth@yechielroth·
@AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran The largest difference is that the UK’s vast empire was from far away different colonies and cultures, the UK’s grip on them and “glue” that held it together was very weak, especially when the UK had to go beg its former colony the US to bail it out in WW2.
English
2
0
2
61
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@asaio87 It will massively cut jobs literally I am able to do in 20 minutes what usually took me one week to do It won't replace engineer but will massively cut the amount of jobs for them. And also ai is not cheap it is also expensive
English
2
0
1
150
andrei saioc
andrei saioc@asaio87·
Only people who work in non-tech jobs think developers and software engineers are obsolete now due to AI.
English
83
25
441
23.7K
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@DefensePolitics Now try to gather those amount of equipment undetected together in a close area . Just impossible. It will take months of preparation and antidetech and mines already exists. Age of tanks is gone unless reliable anti drone measurements are here.
English
0
0
1
19
Defense Politics Asia
Defense Politics Asia@DefensePolitics·
Its always the problem of whether you can field enough of those anti-tank weapons. FPV drones is OP in Ukraine War - because the armored rushes are all so small. Do a WW2 style rush, these FPV drone operators are all gonna be tortured to death.
planefag@planefag

It is 1919. Tanks are declared obsolete due to anti-tank rifles. It is 1936. Tanks are declared obsolete due to rapid improvements in anti-tank gun technology. It is 1949. Tanks are declared obsolete due to shaped-charge anti-tank weapons. It is 1953. Tanks are declared obsolete due to tactical nuclear weapons. It is 1973. Tanks are declared obsolete due to anti-tank guided missiles. It is 2006. Tanks are declared obsolete due to IEDs and 5th-generation warfare. It is 2024. Tanks are declared obsolete due to FPV drones. [To Be Continued]

English
5
0
9
1.2K
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@Tatarigami_UA Use ai - extract the scheme from the db - it will guide to on how to do it. if it is sql . it will probably have relationships between tables also if not the ai would understand it -> second a simple interface ->both are doable by ai -- much faster than finding someone to do it
English
0
0
0
742
Tatarigami_UA
Tatarigami_UA@Tatarigami_UA·
Вітаю, IT-спільното! Потрібно створити кастомний інтерфейс для роботи з великими масивам даних з російської БД. База даних є, але зручного софту для обробки даних немає. Шукаю спеціалістів для реалізації. Оплата договірна. Писати на frontel@proton.me
Українська
40
63
338
46.6K
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@miadmaleki You do realize that you can öpen Google maps and go to any city in the words and do the same
English
2
0
0
2.6K
Miad Maleki
Miad Maleki@miadmaleki·
I could be wrong, but it's becoming increasingly clear that someone outside Iran is running this account's content. In this post: It appears someone physically located outside Iran took this screenshot. Google Maps is set to English, not Farsi. The device is configured for an English-speaking environment. The White House is tagged "Recently viewed," a personalized indicator from a signed-in Google account on an iPhone. Google services require a functioning connection to Google's servers, which are blocked for ordinary Iranians both by the regime's own internet shutdown and by Google's sanctions compliance.
محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf@mb_ghalibaf

Enjoy the current pump figures. With the so-called 'blockade', Soon you'll be nostalgic for $4–$5 gas. ΔO_BSOH>0 ⇒ f(f(O))>f(O)

English
190
530
2.5K
457.1K
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@DefensePolitics What are you talking about - They do have leverage they can literally nuke the whole world economies by keeping the strait close you ain't having a functional economy at 140$ per barrel Already is it the worst possible scenario happening to them . What they got to lose.
English
0
0
3
100
Defense Politics Asia
Defense Politics Asia@DefensePolitics·
Because Iran think they have leverage. They dont.
Richard@ricwe123

Reports on the US–Iran talks suggest a stark contrast in preparation,raising questions about which side is genuinely intent on reaching a resolution. The US delegation arrived only on the 11th in a rush. After landing, Vance is said to have taken a four-hour rest to recover from jet lag. By the time he reached the negotiating room, the Iranian team had already outlined the main points for the opening round of discussions. Sources claim the US had not even finalized the agenda with the Pakistani side beforehand and was instead working off a framework put forward by Iran. This last-minute approach sits uneasily alongside the fact that the US delegation numbered around 300 people. The US side reportedly brought only a few pages of broad, principle-based proposals, while the Iranian delegation arrived with extensive documentation and draft agreements. Their materials included over 120 pages of technical specifications on nuclear facility safety alone, suggesting a far higher level of preparation and a clearer commitment to producing concrete outcomes.

English
37
0
16
2.9K
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@steroid_druid @theelishev They are Probably Ukrainians. There are a lot of Jews in Ukraine Their prime minister was a Ukrainian woman her goldamair . Didn't zelensky two friend run there after stealing
English
1
0
2
358
Pickmeman
Pickmeman@abduffevhyfc·
@iAl3eez @grok A bridge is just absurd for the distance - Tunnel is the realistic choice here but still would be extremely expensive
English
0
0
1
978
عزيز تقني
عزيز تقني@iAl3eez·
🔴 اتحفونا ليش مافيه جسر بين ايطاليا والبانيا بدل سفر يوم كامل ؟ اذا عندك جواب يا @grok جاوب مع السبب؟
عزيز تقني tweet media
العربية
1.9K
144
4.5K
12.8M

Keşfet

@yechielroth @AssWhoop2026 @arash_tehran @IndexSabot @TR63247959 @aleksthgrt @GeoPDude @NotWoofers