Adam Sieff

654 posts

Adam Sieff banner
Adam Sieff

Adam Sieff

@adamssieff

first amendment + constitutional litigator @dwtlaw

Los Angeles, CA Katılım Nisan 2009
1.9K Takip Edilen974 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Adam Sieff
Adam Sieff@adamssieff·
We need to give voters a better blue-state model for success.  And we can start right here in California. Some ideas here, with thanks to the @SoCalOpinion news group for publishing. dailynews.com/2024/11/12/ada…
English
2
4
13
3K
Adam Sieff retweetledi
Jonah Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg@JonahDispatch·
One can go too far with guilt-by-association arguments, but the simple fact is that they are literally associated with these groups. They may not be members of these groups, they may even privately oppose them or work to minimize their influence within the party. But they are still part of an organization that does not reject them. Maoists and Communists are in their tent. If a Republican candidate was a member of some broad front that had openly Nazi and Fascist organizations committed to overthrowing the Constitution within it, I don't think we would hear a lot of "well, ackshully conservatism and fascism are very different things" the way we hear "well, ackshully, democratic socialism and communism have nothing to do with each other." And, for the record, I am appalled by Republicans -- led by Trump and Vance-- who want racists and Nazi simps to have a place inside their "big tent." But I see no reason why liberals shouldn't be appalled by the DSA's similar attitude toward Stalinists, Maoists, and supporters of terrorism. Okay I'm done. 13/13
English
39
39
470
27.2K
Adam Sieff
Adam Sieff@adamssieff·
Mark Walter has hopefully seen enough of Rob Pelinka.
English
0
0
0
56
Adam Sieff
Adam Sieff@adamssieff·
@JakeSherman This is a win for political parties and the political center. It’s a loss for self-funding billionaires, Super PACs, and fringe candidates. If the GOP was stronger in 2015-16, Jeb or Marco or Hillary might have been president.
English
1
0
5
8.9K
Adam Sieff
Adam Sieff@adamssieff·
This is a win for political parties and the political establishment. It’s a loss for self-funding billionaires, Super PACs, and fringe candidates. If the GOP was stronger in 2015-16, Jeb or Marco or Hillary might have been president…
SCOTUSblog@SCOTUSblog

The next opinion is in NRSC v. FEC, on campaign finance. The court holds that the Federal Election Campaign Act's political-party coordinated-expenditure limits violate the First Amendment. supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf…

English
0
0
0
203
Adam Sieff
Adam Sieff@adamssieff·
@StatisticUrban There have been a series of these over the years, usually under a takings theory, most recently concentrated on COVID rules.
English
0
0
0
116
Hunter📈🌈📊
Hunter📈🌈📊@StatisticUrban·
There's a case slowly working its way through federal courts in NYC that has the potential to become a national case. The plaintiffs are challenging the constitutionality of NY's rent control and stabilization laws. And they managed to land a judge appointed by Trump...
Hunter📈🌈📊 tweet media
English
128
353
4.4K
418K
Brad Wilcox
Brad Wilcox@BradWilcoxIFS·
"Houston is green [lots of kids] nearly to its core, w/ family-heavy neighborhoods sitting close to downtown. Los Angeles is mostly orange/tan [no/few kids], its children pushed into a handful of pockets.. both sprawling Sun Belt metros, yet one is visibly a place that raises children & the other, increasingly, is not."
Brad Wilcox tweet media
English
47
93
681
242.1K
Adam Sieff retweetledi
Senator Scott Wiener
Senator Scott Wiener@Scott_Wiener·
Senator Wiener’s Statement on Physical Intimidation and Harassment of Political Leaders SAN FRANCISCO – In two separate incidents this week, Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) was harassed, threatened, and physically intimidated while attending public events to engage with the San Francisco community. Both incidents were sparked by people who had previously targeted Senator Wiener with aggressive behavior in the past. Senator Wiener issued the following statement on the incidents: ”Last night I attended the trans march, as I’ve done each year for the past 22 years since the first march in 2004. I attend each year in solidarity with our trans siblings, who are facing existential threats from right wing extremists, including the President. It has been a deep honor to partner for many years with trans people to advance legislation and budget requests to support the community. ”As I walked through Dolores Park to participate in a trans-led Pride Shabbat service in connection with the trans march, a group of people began screaming at me, ran up to me, surrounded me, and began harassing me, both verbally and physically, including physical contact. They made statements about my ‘Israeli handlers,’ among many other inaccurate, extreme, and vile statements. They were so physically and verbally aggressive that it was impossible for me to safely remain in the park. As a result, I left the park and, for the very first time, did not participate in the trans march. “This follows an incident Wednesday night at a bar in the Mission where I’d gone to watch a World Cup game. During the game, a man accosted me in a corner of the bar, effectively cornering me and the young women staffers who were with me. He screamed abuse at me and our staff before being ejected by the bar’s employees. After being ejected, the man remained outside the bar, shouting my name and pounding on the side of the bar near where I was sitting for several minutes. The same individual, in December 2023, stalked me on a plane and in an airport, shouting at me about my ‘tainted bloodline.’ ”I have no objection whatsoever to anyone disagreeing with me, opposing me, or protesting me. All of that is core to democracy. I also have no issue when people talk to me on the street and ask questions or express opposition. That’s democracy, even when the people engaging in this conduct misrepresent my views. “But when opposition and disagreement transition to harassment, including cornering me, touching me, or trying to physically bully me out of a public event, that crosses a line.  We’re living in a time when violence is all too often threatened or used against people in public life. In San Francisco, we’re better than that.”
English
5K
615
5.2K
1.9M
Adam Sieff
Adam Sieff@adamssieff·
@JoshuaJPrince Are there many federal courts that don’t already do this—i.e., deny a PI because the plaintiff lacks standing, or because the court must abstain? Seems straightforward that jurisdiction is a prerequisite to granting any kind of relief.
English
0
0
0
233
Joshua J. Prince
Joshua J. Prince@JoshuaJPrince·
This paragraph in Mullin v. Doe is going to be huge moving forward.
Joshua J. Prince tweet media
English
4
3
47
10.5K
Adam Sieff
Adam Sieff@adamssieff·
This is what happens when you let foxes guard the hen house. The city needs a strong mayor and a traditional council, not the weak-mayor council-fiefdom system we have. But council won’t consider reforms that would empower the mayor or voters. latimes.com/california/sto…
English
0
0
1
78
Matt Platkin
Matt Platkin@mattplatkin·
Hey @united, are you a Spurs fan or something? What’s up with this blatant price gouging? #LGK
Matt Platkin tweet media
English
5
0
1
865
Adam Sieff
Adam Sieff@adamssieff·
@rcalo @craignewmark @GaryMarcus This is not crazy from a 230 perspective—there may be material contribution here unlike algorithmically organized search results. One question is whether ordinary 1A scienter protections would apply. They should b/c this is not commercial speech.
English
0
0
0
103