Ajay Krishnan

919 posts

Ajay Krishnan banner
Ajay Krishnan

Ajay Krishnan

@ajaynomics

https://t.co/Cf4Dx8fg1A - an AI lawyer trained on my law practice, free for employees. https://t.co/GtWexMpwed - the voice of X, in newspaper form.

SFO - YYZ "Basic Economy" Katılım Temmuz 2012
652 Takip Edilen158 Takipçiler
Ajay Krishnan retweetledi
송준 Jun Song
송준 Jun Song@jun_song·
코드를 작성하는 방법을 공부하지 마세요. 코드가 어떻게 작동하는지 구조를 공부하세요. 시간을 아끼세요.
한국어
6
6
114
3.9K
Ajay Krishnan retweetledi
staysaasy
staysaasy@staysaasy·
The degree to which you are awed by AI is perfectly correlated with how much you use AI to code.
English
81
178
1.7K
2.1M
Ajay Krishnan
Ajay Krishnan@ajaynomics·
X is the new newspaper, but it's disorgnaized. I want to fix that. Introducing The New Grok Times.
Ajay Krishnan tweet media
English
1
0
0
24
Ajay Krishnan
Ajay Krishnan@ajaynomics·
If @openclaw and @steipete were to release and market "Open Claw Code", it would do very well. More important, it would irritate the legal department at a certain frontier AI lab -- probably without infringing any IP rights. My lawyer helped me write this. /cc @sama
English
0
0
0
47
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
Something I've been thinking about - I am bullish on people (empowered by AI) increasing the visibility, legibility and accountability of their governments. Historically, it is the governments that act to make society legible (e.g. "Seeing like a state" is the common reference), but with AI, society can dramatically improve its ability to do this in reverse. Government accountability has not been constrained by access (the various branches of government publish an enormous amount of data), it has been constrained by intelligence - the ability to process a lot of raw data, combine it with domain expertise and derive insights. As an example, the 4000-page omnibus bill is "transparent" in principle and in a legal sense, but certainly not in a practical sense for most people. There's a lot more like it: laws, spending bills, federal budgets, freedom of information act responses, lobbying disclosures... Only a few highly trained professionals (investigative journalists) could historically process this information. This bottleneck might dissolve - not only are the professionals further empowered, but a lot more people can participate. Some examples to be precise: Detailed accounting of spending and budgets, diff tracking of legislation, individual voting trends w.r.t. stated positions or speeches, lobbying and influence (e.g. graph of lobbyist -> firm -> client -> legislator -> committee -> vote -> regulation), procurement and contracting, regulatory capture warning lights, judicial and legal patterns, campaign finance... Local governments might be even more interesting because the governed population is smaller so there is less national coverage: city council meetings, decisions around zoning, policing, schools, utilities... Certainly, the same tools can easily cut the other way and it's worth being very mindful of that, but I lean optimistic overall that added participation, transparency and accountability will improve democratic, free societies. (the quoted tweet is half-ish related, but inspired me to post some recent thoughts)
Harry Rushworth@Hrushworth

The British Government is a complicated beast. Dozens of departments, hundreds of public bodies, more corporations than one can count... Such is its complexity that there isn't an org chart for it. Well, there wasn't... Introducing ⚙️Machinery of Government⚙️

English
413
730
5.9K
954.8K
Ajay Krishnan
Ajay Krishnan@ajaynomics·
Yes, AI is replacing software developers. But these former software developers are going to dominate whatever fields they choose to pursue next.
English
0
0
1
31
Ajay Krishnan
Ajay Krishnan@ajaynomics·
An evaluation of Canada's regulations by Milton Friedman and his friends -- we have work to do, but we are better than Europe?!
English
1
0
1
38
Christian Dean
Christian Dean@christiandean_·
Merz has called for the systematic review of all EU legislation. That's over 140,000 regulations. Knowing the EU, that will take over 140,000 days. So, I made bettereu.com where Grok 4.1 will review every document since 1958 -> 2025.
Clash Report@clashreport

Germany's Merz: We must deregulate every sector. I call for a “regulatory clean slate.” Minor corrections to laws are not sufficient. We need to systematically review the whole set of existing EU legislation.

English
242
513
4.3K
327K
Saksham
Saksham@sxmawl·
we just hired our 25 founding engineers
English
598
592
9.7K
1.4M
Ajay Krishnan
Ajay Krishnan@ajaynomics·
@Jason Would be good if @DavidSacks could listen for more than 15 seconds at a time without interrupting the guest. Maybe do an episode where Sacks interviews himself so he can get it out of his system.
English
0
0
0
18
@jason
@jason@Jason·
Permission to be candid: what did you think of the last All In episode?
English
2.8K
19
1.6K
659.5K
Ajay Krishnan
Ajay Krishnan@ajaynomics·
@eyeslasho Depopulation = rotting of infrastructure, which was built and financed on anticipated growth. Can’t talk about technology and ignore roads, bridges, hospitals, schools.
English
0
0
0
47
Ajay Krishnan
Ajay Krishnan@ajaynomics·
By this logic you should support Biden. The USA was built on a culture of institutional politicians who stay within the bounds of previous norms and traditions. A candidate who is pornstar-adultering, insurrection-promoting, and worshiper of dictators shouldn't be president. Right?
English
0
0
0
17
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
As for tobacco and alcohol, the causal usage of either substance is not nearly as harmful to society. And besides, tobacco and alcohol helped build this country. They’re part of our culture going back centuries. Weed is not and shouldn’t be.
English
355
39
723
134K
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
There are many substances that exist in the natural world that you’re not supposed to put in your body. So the “God created it” line is bullshit. Even if alcohol and cigarettes are worse, that still doesn’t mean that weed should be legal. All you’ve done by that logic is add to a problem. And saying that it hasn’t killed anyone is to simply ignore all of the deaths caused by people under the influence. It also ignores the volumes of research showing all kinds of long and short term negative health effects. All you’ve done here is rattle off the most cliched possible list of pothead comebacks and they’re all either incorrect or irrelevant.
Robby@Bobby1493401

@MattWalshBlog Bad call. Alcohol and cigarettes are far worse. God created it. It hasn’t killed anybody. Veterans need it for ptsd etc. a democrat made it illegal decades ago. Joe Biden is against it and thinks it’s a gateway drug. Prohibition is unconstitutional.

English
569
174
2.2K
543.7K
Ajay Krishnan
Ajay Krishnan@ajaynomics·
@igor_alexandrov @lazaronixon Need more facts to know if he’s right or wrong? How big is the project, how many developers, how much will the team grow, what’s the appetite for tech debt in short term?
English
0
0
0
82
Igor Alexandrov
Igor Alexandrov@igor_alexandrov·
The client hired a C-level officer who thinks about how #Ruby is dying, and nobody learns it, so we need to get away from it. I am tired of these conversations, but tomorrow, I have a call. How should I change his mind?
Georgia 🇬🇪 English
79
6
108
42.2K
Ajay Krishnan
Ajay Krishnan@ajaynomics·
@GregMolnar @ncameron Honest question: how can one feel comfortable releasing to production without doing this? What do you use instead? I generally use cancancan and test authorization for each endpoint (in addition to testing the Ability business logic)
English
0
0
1
49
Greg Molnar
Greg Molnar@GregMolnar·
@ncameron But do you also test that the policies and scopes are applied in the necessary controllers/jobs, etc?
English
1
0
3
989
Greg Molnar
Greg Molnar@GregMolnar·
Rails devs, do you ever write any security tests? I mean test cases for authorization for instance like these: "User A can't access User B's account" "User A can't create records in User B's account" etc
English
57
1
70
26.7K