Amit Kumar Goyal

2K posts

Amit Kumar Goyal banner
Amit Kumar Goyal

Amit Kumar Goyal

@akgoyal

Pharma and analytics person, aspiring photographer, music and movie lover. Opinionated. Opinions, Tweets, and RTs personal.

Katılım Kasım 2007
980 Takip Edilen697 Takipçiler
Amit Kumar Goyal
Amit Kumar Goyal@akgoyal·
But.... Aurangzeb loved Mangoes.
Ahmed Al-Khalidi@khalidi79397

So why does "indigenous vs. colonizer" almost always mean Europeans, and almost never Bantu, Turks, Arabs, Slavs, or Han Chinese? A few reasons, in descending order of how much they actually explain: 1. Recency and documentation. European expansion happened in the era of the printing press, photography, census records, and treaties. The Bantu expansion left no paperwork. The Arab conquests are 1,300 years old and mythologized as religious destiny rather than conquest. When the receipts exist, the case is easier to make, and Europeans left receipts. 2. The winners wrote the framework. Modern human-rights language, postcolonial theory, and the very category of "indigenous peoples" were built in Western universities after WWII, primarily to process European guilt over European empires. The tool was designed for one job. Asking it to evaluate the Arab conquest of Egypt or the Turkic conquest of Anatolia is like asking a tax form to diagnose a disease. It wasn't built for that. 3. Christendom is critique-able; other civilizations aren't. You can write a bestseller attacking Western Christian civilization from inside a Western university and win awards for it. Try writing the equivalent book about Arab-Islamic conquest from inside Cairo or Istanbul. The asymmetry isn't about history. It's about which societies tolerate self-criticism and which punish it. So the critical literature piles up on one side and barely exists on the other. 4. The Soviet inheritance. Cold War-era anti-colonial framing was deliberately shaped by Moscow to delegitimize the West while giving its own empire and its allies' conquests, a pass. That framework outlived the USSR and still structures a lot of academic and activist vocabulary today. 5. Race makes it legible. European colonizers usually looked different from the colonized. Turkic conquerors of Anatolia, Arab conquerors of the Levant, and Bantu expansionists in Africa generally didn't look dramatically different from the populations they absorbed. The visual contrast made European empire easier to narrate as racial, and once a story has a clean visual, it travels. 6. And finally, Jews. The framework's selective application reaches its most absurd point when a people indigenous to a specific land, with continuous presence, language, religion, and archaeological record tying them to it for three thousand years, get labeled "colonial settlers", while the actual seventh-century conquerors who Arabized the region get labeled "indigenous." At that point the framework isn't describing reality. It's laundering a conclusion. The label isn't tracking who got there first. It's tracking who it's currently fashionable to blame.

English
0
0
0
16
Amit Kumar Goyal retweetledi
Sougat Chakraborty
Sougat Chakraborty@sougat18·
Ivy League Scholar: We use the most dense, incomprehensible academic jargon in the world. No normal person can understand us. Ashoka University Scholar: Hold my iced matcha latte. I just put 'homohindunationalist co-option' and 'transformative horizons' in the same sentence, and I'm just getting warmed up.
Sougat Chakraborty tweet media
English
13
26
110
4.1K
Amit Kumar Goyal
Amit Kumar Goyal@akgoyal·
@HMBrough_ This has long been a pet peeve of mine. When reading about Latin American history, I saw constant disclaimers about not taking the work of white historians literally given their biases. However, when the same is applied to Indian history, we are accused of changing it.
English
0
0
4
120
Hugh
Hugh@HMBrough_·
On the contrary, a historian knows that the past is frequently reinterpreted in light of the present (eg Anglos going from seeing their civil war as “The Interregnum” to writing hagiographies of Cromwell, or Americans going from a neutral-positive to vitriolically negative view of Woodrow Wilson). Indians are similarly involved in a reassessment of the Mughal Era today.
Samyak Ghosh 🌈@GhoshSamyak

One of the worst predicaments of being a professional historian today is that you are expected to engage with this mediocrity. The Print has a habit of publishing pieces that no respectable scholar in the field will even read. Not surprised they carried this to create some noise!

English
4
7
71
4.3K
Amit Kumar Goyal retweetledi
Narendra Shenoy
Narendra Shenoy@shenoyn·
One constitutional amendment should be made. Any govt(centre or state)which increases the deficit of that govt for four consecutive quarters should stand automatically dissolved and fresh elections should be held. THEN let's see how much socialism these guys have an appetite for
English
0
2
5
456
Amit Kumar Goyal retweetledi
Shubh
Shubh@kadaipaneeeer·
2 children of Mangilal Biwal • Vikas Biwal- SMS Jaipur • Pragati Biwal- GMC Dausa 2 daughters of Ghanshyam Biwal • Palak Biwal- SMS Jaipur • Saniya Biwal- Mumbai Medical College 2 children of Dinesh Biwal • Gunjan Biwal- BHU Varanasi • His son gave NEET this year Meanwhile when reporters asked their mother about the kids: 1. “They are not my kids, they are distant relatives.” 2. “I am illiterate, I don’t know where they study.” 3. “I don’t talk to them often.” This is exactly how this rotten system survives, lies, denial, fake stories, and entire families quietly benefiting while lakhs of genuine students keep suffering. And this is just one family. There are hundreds, maybe thousands, operating the same way behind the scenes. Also 4 of them are still in their first year, clearly 2025 NEET was leaked as well. And even after having enough proofs, NTA will keep denying that every year paper gets leaked & openly sold to people with connections.
Shubh@kadaipaneeeer

So NEET 2025 paper was also leaked. The BJP leader brothers arrested in Rajasthan allegedly bought the paper because one of their children was appearing for NEET this year. During the investigation, it reportedly surfaced that four students from their family had already secured top government medical colleges last year. And this was despite NEET 2025 being tougher than both 2024 and 2026. This is not just “corruption.” This is the destruction of an entire generation’s trust in the education system. Millions of students study for years, sacrifice their mental health, isolate themselves, and families spend their life savings only for politically connected people to buy access from the backdoor. We are talking about a national examination here, not some school or college test. If papers can be leaked, sold, and manipulated this easily, then merit in this country is becoming a joke. The system is rotten, the people protecting it are worse, and students lives clearly hold no value to any of them. But our dear PM Modi will never talk about these issues in “Pariksha Pe Charcha” instead he’ll ask aspirants to meditate. How many more innocent lives will be compromised to stop this rotten system ?! We are doomed as a nation fr

हिन्दी
38
630
1.8K
87.6K
Amit Kumar Goyal retweetledi
Bob Golen
Bob Golen@BobGolen·
Bob is my nickname. Robert is my nicholasname.
English
152
8K
80.5K
1.1M
Amit Kumar Goyal retweetledi
Liberty Pill Memes
Liberty Pill Memes@LibertyPillMeme·
"Wish servers" 💀
English
100
982
11K
376.3K
Amit Kumar Goyal
Amit Kumar Goyal@akgoyal·
FDA approval doesn't necessitate coverage by payers. There are enough examples of drugs approved by FDA but not covered by payers. PCSK9s are a good example. Approved, work, but had to significantly cut prices to gain coverage.
Amit Kumar Goyal tweet media
Anish Koka, MD@anish_koka

My take is that Makary and prasad approved a wide array of therapeutics that actually worked that didn’t have an RCT and cowrote a number of articles in a little “paywalled journal” called the NEJM 🙄 outlining a framework for lowering the regulatory bar for promising therapies. Their exit from the FDA has more to do with the lord of the flies ecosystem of incompetent middle managers in charge at the FDA and in Congress that exploit rare disease patients to demand the nurturing of zombie companies with therapies that don’t work/could potentially be dangerous. Makary would have had to overturn an FDA on therapies that were potentially dangerous with incredibly weak signals of efficacy. The first decision that lead to Vinay’s firing was keeping a drug on the market that was killing kids (approved with similar dubious data) But I don’t think it would have mattered in the end. Makary and Prasad were outsiders who thought they had a mandate to disrupt a hierarchy and they elicited a fierce antibody response. What the politicians need when gas is $5/gallon and midterms approach are not headlines about FDA in chaos that are sourced from the status quo partisan zipcode the FDA resides in. That requires someone who FDA middle management approves of which is basically someone more well versed in politics than science. More broadly, we should allow for expanded access to whatever people want to try— whether the FDA approves it or not. At the moment FDA approval translates to billion dollar valuations because it comes with the defacto mandate third parties pay. Third party payment is you .. you pay that in the form of taxes/health insurance premiums. A world where you try whatever you want and funding comes from private foundations if blue cross decides not to cover something makes it a lot harder for @AppleHelix @MartinShkreli et al to get a return on their investment. Ignore the noise , that’s really what this is about

English
0
0
1
40