Ali

May the blessings of Allah be upon our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ

Prophet Muhammad ﷺ - The trustful and trustworthy الصادق الامين

@Dunedain8456555 Literal statistics shows that Islam has the highest retention rate of any religion.

@al_done3 No. Literal statistics shows that to be true. Islam is growing due to birth rates. Just cope. Lol

The Ex-Muslim movement is dead. It was always a rare online phenomenon (irrelevant in the real world) but it had at least some online momentum in the 2010s, now it’s cringe.

@Dunedain8456555 Might be true on your Youtube or Tiktok algorithm but it’s rare in real life as all data and lived reality shows.

@al_done3 Absolutely true.

@senttXI Again, this is a purely online phenomenon but it’s rare in real life. The reason why these Tiktoks go viral is because they are so rare and people are surprised. Also most of these girls are young (in their early twenties), many will eventually leave Atheism when they grow older.

Nope, ex Muslims (almost all feminists) are trending at an all time high on TikTok. Talking about how they took off the hijab and “liberated themselves from the patriarchy” Either that or they’ve become closet atheists , girls who’ve been oneshotted by radfems on their algorithms + the Aisha age/women in hell Hadiths and decided to reject Sunni Islam altogether. These videos regularly get hundreds of thousands of likes by Gen Z Muslim girls in the west

@Dunedain8456555 Not true

@al_done3 People are literally leaving Islam in droves. What are you talking about?

Israel killed all of them, Never ever forget .

@siaro313 @birdeavor @Chainless_Slave The Prophet ﷺ married Aisha in Mecca, before he ever became a political leader.

@birdeavor @Chainless_Slave All of this is true except Aisha was not the exception, she fell under this umbrella of political marriage

Why was Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) allowed certain things that we aren’t allowed? @Chainless_Slave’s response completely shocked the questioner, making them realize why God allowed the Prophet to have things we don't.

Eventually, many of them end up reverting back to Islam, especially as they mature and grow older since Atheism and secularism only offer nihilism, depression and hyper-individualism whereas Islam offers spiritual comfort and stability, family and community.

As an authority on Islamic law, I can tell you the claims this person are making are utter crap: 1) Islamic law does not require witnesses to prove rape, watch this (youtube.com/watch?v=eCUj1f…) 2) What he is mentioning is British colonial law, which was hostile towards rape victims and generally assumed that any evidence put forth by a female victim was not credible. See next. 3) Pakistani law does not require four witnesses to prove rape. (Section 375 of the Pakistan Penal Code). See the CMI report: (cmi.no/publications/f…) 4) The perpetrators are overwhelmingly British citizens or long-term UK residents, making it fundamentally a domestic failure of law enforcement, social services, and political will to protect vulnerable girls and deliver justice regardless of ethnicity. 5) Lowe's stats are inflated and highly inferential. Home Office 2020 report and Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. Grooming cases in certain locales disproportionately involved South Asian. Broader child sexual abuse data shows most offenders nationally are white due to population demographics. Which is a bit of a no-brainer. Trying to blame Muslims or Immigrants is an attempt to sidestep responsibility. Fomenting hatred and bigotry isn't going to solve the problem. Manning up and actually curbing the vices in your own society and having the political will to change will.

He died after fulfilling the trust given to him from the heavens above, without leaving any inheritance behind, having gathered the divided tribes of Arabia into a nation that ruled the entire world. They went on to control more land in 70 years than the Roman Empire did in 800 years. They established justice & God’s sovereignty between the people and amongst themselves. They brought the nations to know and worship One God, disassociating from their idols and espousing pure monotheism. He is the best of God’s creation, the finality of the prophets and messenger, he who is more beautiful than the moon on a clear night. We miss you O Messenger of Allah. Oh Allah we ask you the companionship of your beloved in your paradise.

A brief personal note before I begin: I am not a Muslim- I want to be clear about that. However, I have studied religious history and religious studies at university level. But if I ever were to convert to Islam, I would follow the Maliki school. No hesitation. Why? Because Maliki jurisprudence roots itself in something rare: the living, continuous traditions of Medina - the city where the Prophet actually lived, governed, taught, and died alongside his companions. Malik ibn Anas made a powerful argument: that this unbroken, generation-to-generation practice carried a weight that written texts alone simply couldn't replicate. The people of Medina were the living Sunnah. I find that deeply compelling. The school also developed something I think is underappreciated - Sadd al-Dharai, or blocking the means. The idea is simple but sharp: if an otherwise neutral act almost certainly leads to harm, you prohibit it at the source. As a tool against religious radicalization, it's remarkably well-suited. More schools could learn from it. Now for the harder part. I don't believe Shia Islam represents authentic Islam as understood from its original sources. That's a personal view, and I hold it carefully. It doesn't mean I want Shia Islam suppressed, and it certainly doesn't mean I look down on Shia Muslims. I don't. But I think the tradition departs from some core Islamic principles in ways that deserve honest discussion rather than polite avoidance. So here's my thinking. The Imamate. The doctrine that divine, infallible leadership passed through a specific bloodline after the Prophet's death simply isn't in the Quran. Islam's whole foundation is Tawhid - the absolute, uncompromising oneness of God. When you start attributing infallibility and divine appointment to human beings, however noble their lineage, you're introducing something that Islamic theology was never designed to accommodate! That's not a footnote. That's a foundational problem. The seal of prophethood. The Quran is clear: Muhammad was Khatam an-Nabiyyin - the final prophet. Revelation ended with his death. But the Shia concept of Ilham - that the Imams received divine inspiration and held exclusive authority over hidden Quranic meanings - effectively extends prophethood under a different label. The theological issue doesn't disappear just because the word changes. The Sahaba. The entire chain of Islamic transmission rests on the companions who memorized, recorded, and passed down the Quran and Hadith. If you argue that most of them became corrupt or went astray after the Prophet died, you've created a serious logical problem: you can't discredit the transmitters while trusting what they transmitted. The chain of custody matters. It always does. Infallibility. God alone is perfect. God alone knows the unseen. That's not a minor theological preference in Islam - it's the whole point. Claiming the Twelve Imams were entirely free from error and possessed knowledge of the unseen assigns divine attributes to human beings. I think that crosses a clear line! Taqiyyah. I understand the historical context - practicing concealment under threat of persecution. But from an evidentiary standpoint, it creates a problem that's hard to get around: if any historical statement that contradicts current doctrine can simply be dismissed as an instance of concealment, how do you verify anything? It becomes an unfalsifiable system! The Occultation. The belief that the Twelfth Imam went into supernatural hiding in the ninth century and is still alive today, waiting to return - there's no Quranic foundation for this! It arose during a moment of acute political crisis, when the Eleventh Imam died without an obvious successor. The imagery - a hidden savior, a messianic return - maps closely onto pre-Islamic mystical traditions of the region. That's not coincidence. That's historical borrowing! So for me shia islam is not real Islam.

Meanwhile, Obama dismissed the Syrian opposition in 2014: “When you get farmers, dentists, and folks who have never fought before going up against a ruthless opposition in Assad…” It’s a shame that Trump is doing a much better job on Syria than the Democrats did.

You people that live in the west have to be careful on what you say/engage on here, there are so many feds and agents cosplaying as Muslims here Thought id warn you

In the Prophet's Mosque, every Monday and Thursday, Iftars are held for those who are fasting.

Some people just have adab so beautiful it makes you understand why the Prophet ﷺ was sent to perfect character. The whole message feels alive in front of you.

I agree with most of this thread. Full solidarity for Iran against Epstein Coalition in 2025-26, but we shouldnt whitewash their extremely mixed (at best) record and repeated bouts of hypocrisy. Esp when ppl use the 2025-26 war to whitewash their earlier record

NOBODY WARNED ME AT 22. SO I'M WARNING YOU. (Write, save, screenshot, bookmark, send, whatever you need to do) 1. Barakah is real.