little vincible

13.3K posts

little vincible banner
little vincible

little vincible

@alittlevincible

Tech, futurism and puppies. Never financial advice.

Milky Way Katılım Haziran 2009
853 Takip Edilen868 Takipçiler
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
Red and blue button pushers: who's smarter? In a mostly-subscriber sample who took a brief verbal IQ test, the answer is... Blue pushers! If the whole population has an IQ of 100 with an SD of 15, their mean IQ would be 101.9, versus 97.0 for reds.
Crémieux tweet media
English
668
282
5.7K
1.1M
little vincible retweetledi
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
@BorisJohnson >Boris is a degrowther If even the Conservatives are this daft, so much of Britain's failure now makes sense.
English
39
87
3.5K
51K
little vincible retweetledi
Phil Magness
Phil Magness@PhilWMagness·
Oh, do shut up. Gregg Gonsalves was one of the main villains of public health academia during Covid. He reversed his own lockdowner stance to make an exception for the George Floyd protests, then colluded directly with Fauci to suppress lockdown skeptics a few months later.
Phil Magness tweet media
English
9
19
102
2.6K
OJFL
OJFL@ojfl·
@scottlincicome @NewReaganCaucus Given this graph, it is amazing how little the debt grew during the Bush years with a recession and two wars. Maybe they were not as profligate as it felt?
English
8
2
14
1.5K
little vincible retweetledi
The Rational Animal 🤔
The Rational Animal 🤔@theobjectivist·
Everyone should unequivocally condemn the government-imposed racial discrimination Obama is pushing! Obama makes three errors in one post, all of them philosophical. First, the United States is a constitutional republic, not a democracy. The purpose of the Constitution is to protect individual rights from the majority, not to ensure "equal participation in our democracy." The Founders designed the system specifically to prevent what Obama is demanding: unlimited majority rule. Second, "protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach" sounds correct until you examine the premise. Rights belong to individuals, not groups. The moment you define rights by racial group membership, you have adopted the same collectivist framework that produced the discrimination you claim to oppose. Jim Crow categorized people by race and assigned rights accordingly. Modern voting rights activism does the same thing with different beneficiaries. Both are collectivism. Third, gerrymandering is a problem created entirely by the system Obama wants to preserve: a political structure where the drawing of district lines determines outcomes. His solution is not to fix the structure. It is to ensure his side draws the lines. The government must treat every citizen equally before the law. Everyone should reject Obama's framing entirely. He is not defending individual rights. He is defending group power, while using the language of rights to make collectivism sound like liberty.
Barack Obama@BarackObama

Today’s Supreme Court decision effectively guts a key pillar of the Voting Rights Act, freeing state legislatures to gerrymander legislative districts to systematically dilute and weaken the voting power of racial minorities - so long as they do it under the guise of “partisanship” rather than explicit “racial bias.” And it serves as just one more example of how a majority of the current Court seems intent on abandoning its vital role in ensuring equal participation in our democracy and protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach. The good news is that such setbacks can be overcome. But that will only happen if citizens across the country who cherish our democratic ideals continue to mobilize and vote in record numbers - not just in the upcoming midterms or in high profile races, but in every election and every level.

English
383
3.9K
11.7K
230.1K
Tim R
Tim R@TimRRich·
I have Tesla solar with 3 powerwalls, 2026 Model S Plaid, and a 2025 4x4 Cybertruck. Wife and I both have majority of Tesla stock in our portfolios. I am 67 and still working, and will not take social security until 70. I have held Tesla shares since 2017. We are in no hurry, and have 100% confidence in Elon. IF it don't go up in multiples, we will live with the consequences. I do not ask my friends or kin to invest this way. IT is not sound. I just believe.
English
1
0
4
99
SaralTrader_Pragati
SaralTrader_Pragati@SaralTrader·
Cathie Wood predicts Tesla stock $TSLA to reach $4,000. what do you think?
English
226
16
477
68.8K
little vincible
little vincible@alittlevincible·
I don’t know you, you don’t know me. I can’t say what Tesla will be in 2035, but I’ve been in Tesla since 2011 until January and am sharing my thoughts because I see too much optimism right now. Space X IPO is big negative, and potentially really undervalues Tesla in the event of an acquisition. That is to say that there may be no Tesla at all, and the potential value loss is huge if that happens. Execution has been very slow too. There are so many great companies right now…. I just wanted to say that to you because I’ve been all in on Tesla and know what it’s like.
English
1
0
4
60
Jack
Jack@jackunheard·
I replied to Erika Kirk and said I’m praying for her. I lost a ton of followers for it. Is this really what we’re doing now?
English
2.5K
986
19.2K
211.7K
little vincible retweetledi
jim iuorio
jim iuorio@jimiuorio·
The Sergey Brin story condensed… 1) “my family fled socialism in 1979” 2) “I began fighting hard to bring socialism to my new home” 3) “I succeeded in bringing socialism to California” 4). “I’m moving before I have to give these annoying socialists my money” Accurate????
English
175
716
6.6K
97.5K
little vincible
little vincible@alittlevincible·
@alojoh Slow execution might as well be no execution. Thanks for being honest, AJ
English
0
0
0
303
little vincible retweetledi
Batya Ungar-Sargon
Batya Ungar-Sargon@bungarsargon·
An example of how they cook the books to absolve the Left of violence in the WSJ today: A graph it published that seems to show near parity between Left and Right wing political violence is sourced to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, which by its own admission reclassified pro-Palestinian violence as "ethnonationalist". It classifies all antisemitism as Right-wing, and all pro-Palestinian "attacks on Jewish individuals or institutions" as "ethnonationalist." This is just nakedly partisan propaganda presented as "data" and then mainstreamed in the American press. More in my column below linked.
Batya Ungar-Sargon tweet mediaBatya Ungar-Sargon tweet mediaBatya Ungar-Sargon tweet mediaBatya Ungar-Sargon tweet media
Batya Ungar-Sargon@bungarsargon

Debunking the Data That Claims to Show Most Political Violence Comes From the Right: There's a lot of funky data out there being compiled by nakedly partisan organizations and spread as though it's factual by the liberal media. My column: batya-us.com/p/debunking-th…

English
244
3.9K
12.2K
433K
little vincible retweetledi
Charlie Bilello
Charlie Bilello@charliebilello·
The top 0.1% of income earners in California make 12% of the state's total income and pay 27% of total income taxes. The bottom 50% of income earners make 12% of total income and pay 3% of total income taxes. If the 0.1% leave, the revenue gap must be filled through higher taxes from everyone else or lower public spending.
Charlie Bilello tweet media
English
232
534
2.6K
214.3K
little vincible retweetledi
Arthur MacWaters
Arthur MacWaters@ArthurMacwaters·
Let me get this straight: > the top 1% earners in CA pay a cumulative $40-$50b/yr in income tax > yet CA Medicaid alone loses $50b/yr in fraud So, you can work your whole life to be incredibly successful, and bureaucrats in CA will redistribute it to fraudsters The Bolscheviks working to pass an asset seizure cannot be trusted.
Arthur MacWaters tweet media
Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️@christopherrufo

EXCLUSIVE: Multiple senior HHS officials estimate that, under Gavin Newsom, California's state Medicaid program has lost 25 percent of its budget to fraud. This would mean it is currently losing $50 billion a year to scammers, fraudsters, and organized crime rings.

English
431
3.5K
13.3K
1.5M
little vincible
little vincible@alittlevincible·
@Kern_Harst @alojoh I also trimmed. Not on HC. You are learning a system and you will get a feel for doing this. Note: also you will never trade the exact same trades as AJ, or anyone. Be patient! These are great names and many opportunities exist.
English
0
0
2
61
Kern Harst
Kern Harst@Kern_Harst·
@alojoh I think you explained it as a trim to reduce margin in order to have more opportunity should prices come down... I did not understand it as a sell signal. Did I misunderstand something?
English
2
0
6
1.2K
AJ Investment Research
Yeah, we nailed this one too. That's the signal we shared yesterday. Like clockwork.
AJ Investment Research tweet mediaAJ Investment Research tweet mediaAJ Investment Research tweet media
English
13
5
98
13.8K