
Dude Looks Like a Lady
7.5K posts

Dude Looks Like a Lady
@allwiscoalltime
Packers, Brewers, Bucks, Badgers, Wisconsin, Movies, Science, Nature, Beer
Wisconsin, USA Katılım Mayıs 2015
915 Takip Edilen153 Takipçiler

@Fugel1010 @G_Webs_Since_93 @WI2AZ_Schmitty You clearly still don’t understand what the word “plural” means.,. You guys don’t have more than one in over a full century.
English

@G_Webs_Since_93 @WI2AZ_Schmitty More than the Brewers that’s for sure! Hahaha
English

@jpoliveras @memeticsisyphus Is the $8 a month you get for being retarded online worth it? Or is it just your hobby?
English

@memeticsisyphus I just think its funny how if we try to take a picture of the moon with the iphone it turns into a potato
But in outerspace theres perfect lighting and its at 10k resolution
English

@chasewithenergy @danishacarterr Then you’ve learned nothing lol
English

@allwiscoalltime @danishacarterr I do not agree with that and that’s okay
English

oh shut the fuck up theo lolll


Theo Von@TheoVon
I meant the elites and politicians that are leading us into these wars might make different choices if it was their children. It was hard for me to be angry and talk at the same time. I am thankful for to our troops who serve and are far braver than me. And also wtf do i know.
English

@chasewithenergy @danishacarterr It might be a “bread and circus thing” but we would not be having these issues if he lost
English

@allwiscoalltime @danishacarterr I am calling myself retarded too lol
I’m not wondering why I’m getting attacked as well
I’m wondering how you could not see that voting is a bread and circus thing
English

@chasewithenergy Are you under the impression I think it can be changed?
English

@allwiscoalltime I was 100% serious in voting when I did.
It is concerning that you still aren’t awake to the fact that voting changes nothing at this point
English

@chasewithenergy @danishacarterr I agree with most of this, but you’re on here calling those of us with the foresight to NOT vote for him retarded. And you wonder why you’re getting attacked?
English

@allwiscoalltime @danishacarterr I'm not sure what you mean or want me to do?
I can't change the past, I'm owning up to my mistake WHILE NOT BEING ANON, and I'm now on your side.
you are literally doing what they want us to do
English

@chasewithenergy @danishacarterr You’re acting like this is equivalent to breaking a dinner plate or something. The TINIEST bit of critical thinking would have shown voting for Trump was wrong, & it turns out this is having massive consequences now. Voting is a pretty big deal, if you can’t handle it don’t do it
English

@allwiscoalltime @danishacarterr Ohhh got it.. you’ve never made a mistake 👍🏻
English

@chasewithenergy @danishacarterr Who tf is “we all”?? Sensible people knew voting for Trump wasn’t “right” 🤡🤡
English

@danishacarterr Retard take. He literally did what we all felt was right AND IS DOING THAT NOW TOO BASED ON RECENT EVENTS
English

@gendernull @HarlanJake2003 @DeeWaynee94 Yes… it comes from nature. Certain species brains evolve further than others. This is a result of… NATURE. Morality changes with evolution which is… you guessed it… a result of nature
English

@allwiscoalltime @HarlanJake2003 @DeeWaynee94 Many species rape, you are the one who brought up an abstract "nature" that morality comes from retard
English

Basic human decency predates Christianity by thousands of years.
Humans had empathy, reciprocity, taboos on murder and care for each other long before the church turned up and tried to claim copyright over morality.
The Wreckers datalogs@WreckersDatas
Is what an illiterate would say. What you today call "basic human decency" was acquired because of Christianity
English

@HarlanJake2003 @gendernull @DeeWaynee94 You made the first claim, I countered. My claim, that god didn’t create everything, is the current best model given the data. Your claim, that god did, is made with zero proof or data.
English

@allwiscoalltime @gendernull @DeeWaynee94 No, you made a claim about reality, not just a claim about not having proof.
English

@HarlanJake2003 @gendernull @DeeWaynee94 Human biology doesn’t work that way though. You can’t use “what if’s” in this situation.
English

@allwiscoalltime @gendernull @DeeWaynee94 And would the same apply to an intelligent species like humans if they ate a child and a woman was able to have a child more quickly when, oh I don’t know, an army conquered a foreign land? Or even if they just enslaved the children in the conquered land…
English

@gendernull @HarlanJake2003 @DeeWaynee94 Attempting to limit our understanding of morality to one individual species is crazy work. If Christianity says some killing is ok, nature has nuances too
English

@allwiscoalltime @HarlanJake2003 @DeeWaynee94 Can you explain how it isn't moral for a lion to kill a newborn if we are to derive our morality from nature
English

@gendernull @HarlanJake2003 @DeeWaynee94 So your threshold is that they occur regularly? How is that different from claiming it comes from Christianity, when humans ALSO practice both regularly
English

@allwiscoalltime @HarlanJake2003 @DeeWaynee94 So how do you interpret morality from nature, what acts that occur in nature are unacceptable for humans to partake in, by your logic I assume acts of rape and killing are universally moral due to occuring within nature, on a natural basis, regularly
English

@HarlanJake2003 @gendernull @DeeWaynee94 My defense of what? Saying there’s no god? Do we have proof? Making a claim without proof is false. I’m simply pointing out you cannot claim God created everything without proof
English

@HarlanJake2003 @gendernull @DeeWaynee94 A lion killing a newborn isn’t unjustified, as the female goes into estrus and oftentimes they eat the cubs. If the claim isn’t exclusive then your “universal” claim is moot too.
English

1. You didn’t even attempt to address what I said about lions.
2. I did not make any argument that it had to be exclusive that was a claim from you I completely reject because it is unnecessary for my argument.
3. I’m not a young earth creationist, so no, it’s not malpractice by your definition.
English

@allwiscoalltime @gendernull @DeeWaynee94 Then you’re just arguing you are right because you are right. It’s not an actual argument.
English

@HarlanJake2003 @gendernull @DeeWaynee94 1) Wolves might be the only species that practice unjustified murder, and even that is highly debatable.
2) primary and exclusive are not the same thing.
3) the fact that you’re a “marine biologist” yet claim God created everything is professional malpractice
English

1. Murder is unjustified killing. Unless you want to say things like lions killing of the offspring of previous males is justified, there are species who regularly practice murder.
2. I have a degree in marine biology, so I have learned about the mating behaviors of MANY species. Rape, commonly referred to as forced copulation, as the primary means of reproduction in a species is not even rare. Furthermore, even more species, such as elephant seals, will automatically resort to forced copulation if the female is not receptive, this often involves pinning the female and even biting her until she submits.
English

LOL not only does that assume God did not create the natural world, but it’s also just a non-sequitur.
Furthermore, if it’s not universal then it can obviously change because evolution proposes a universal common ancestor and an other common ancestors in a tree of life. That means that even in humans that is subject to change.
English

@HarlanJake2003 @gendernull @DeeWaynee94 You’re conflating murder with killing, and as for the rape, there aren’t any species that use it EXCLUSIVELY, as you’re implying, making it a moot point
English

What he said is accurate, because under your definition evolutionary fitness is the standard. Not only has this played out with rape and murder causing a greater proportion of an individual’s genetic information to be in the gene pool, but whole species practice rape and murder on the regular.
English



